HOUSE BILL REPORT
ESB 6152
As Passed House:
March 1, 2006
Title: An act relating to penalties for violation of chapter 42.17 RCW, the public disclosure and fair campaign practices act.
Brief Description: Regarding penalties for violations of the public disclosure act.
Sponsors: By Senators Kastama and Kline; by request of Public Disclosure Commission.
Brief History:
State Government Operations & Accountability: 2/17/06 [DP].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 3/1/06, 97-1.
Brief Summary of Engrossed Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STATE GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS & ACCOUNTABILITY
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 8 members: Representatives Haigh, Chair; Green, Vice Chair; Nixon, Ranking Minority Member; Clements, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Hunt, McDermott, Miloscia and Sump.
Staff: Marsha Reilly (786-7135).
Background:
The Public Disclosure Act (Act) covers campaign financing, maximum campaign
contribution limits, political advertising, lobbying, and the financial affairs of public officials.
Once the Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) is aware of a possible Act violation, it may
pursue administrative remedies or may refer the matter to the Office of the Attorney General
(AG) or other law enforcement agencies.
If the remedy or sanction is imposed by a court, the maximum penalty is $10,000 for each
violation. A party who violates the maximum campaign contribution limits may be subject to
a penalty of either $10,000 or three times the amount of the illegal contribution, whichever is
greater. If a court finds that a violation probably affected the outcome of an election, the
court may declare the election void and a special election must be held within 60 days. If a
lobbyist violates the Act, the court may revoke or suspend the lobbyist's registration and may
prohibit the person from receiving compensation or making expenditures for lobbying. A
court can issue a penalty of $10 a day for each day that a statement or report is not filed
beyond the proper deadline. Failure to report a contribution or expenditure can result in a
penalty equivalent to the amount of contribution or expenditure. A court may use injunctive
relief or may compel any action necessary to enforce compliance with the disclosure
requirements.
If the PDC handles a violation administratively, it must hold a hearing, pursuant to the Act, to
determine if a violation occurred, and any order issued pursuant to the hearing is subject to
judicial review. If the PDC does find a violation, it may order the respondent to cease and
desist from the violating activity and may impose a civil penalty of up to $1,000 for an
individual violation, and an aggregate penalty of up to $2,500 for multiple violations included
in a single complaint or hearing. If the respondent does not comply with the order or petition
for review, the PDC may seek enforcement through a court.
Any person may bring an action in court in the name of the state for an alleged violation of
the Act. First, the person must notify the AG and prosecuting attorney of the reasons the
person believes a violation has occurred. If the AG and prosecuting attorney have not
commenced an action within 45 days after this first notice, the person must give a second
notice that he or she will commence a citizen's action within10 days.
Summary of Bill:
The maximum individual penalty that may be assessed by the PDC is increased from $1,000
to $1,700. The maximum aggregate penalty for multiple violations in a single complaint that
may be assessed by the PDC is increased from $2,500 to $4,200.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: The PDC supports the bill. It increases the PDC's penalty authority by modifying the upper limit based on inflation since 1985. The PDC also supports the bill without the inflationary factor that was included in the original bill as the penalty increase is the important factor.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: Vicki Rippie, Public Disclosure Commission.