HOUSE BILL REPORT
2SSB 6172
As Reported by House Committee On:
Criminal Justice & Corrections
Title: An act relating to increasing penalties for the crimes of possession of depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
Brief Description: Increasing penalties for specified sex offenses.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators McAuliffe, Hargrove, Thibaudeau, Shin, Weinstein, Rockefeller, Keiser, Regala, Eide, Rasmussen and Benton).
Brief History:
Criminal Justice & Corrections: 2/17/06, 2/23/06 [DPA].
Brief Summary of Second Substitute Bill (As Amended by House Committee) |
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE & CORRECTIONS
Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 7 members: Representatives O'Brien, Chair; Darneille, Vice Chair; Pearson, Ranking Minority Member; Ahern, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Kirby, Strow and Williams.
Staff: Jim Morishima (786-7191).
Background:
I. Voyeurism
A person is guilty of Voyeurism if, for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire
of any person, he or she knowingly views, photographs, or films:
Voyeurism is an unranked class C felony.
II. Communicating with a Minor for Immoral Purposes
A person is guilty of Communicating with a Minor for Immoral Purposes if he or she
communicates with a minor, or someone the person believes is a minor, for immoral
purposes. Communicating with a Minor for Immoral Purposes is a gross misdemeanor,
unless the person has a previous conviction for a sex offense, in which case the crime is a
class C felony with a seriousness level of III.
III. Possession of Depictions of a Minor Engaged in Sexually Explicit Conduct
A person is guilty of Possession of Depictions of a Minor Engaged in Sexually Explicit
Conduct if he or she knowingly possesses visual or printed matter depicting a minor engaged
in sexually explicit conduct. The crime is an unranked class C felony.
IV. Sex Offenses
Several offenses are currently designated "sex offenses" for purposes of criminal sentencing.
There are several consequences of an offense being a sex offense including:
Summary of Amended Bill:
I. Voyeurism
The penalty for Voyeurism is increased by ranking the offense at seriousness level II.
II. Communicating with a Minor for Immoral Purposes
It is felony Communicating with a Minor for Immoral Purposes (as opposed to a gross
misdemeanor) if the perpetrator makes the communication through the sending of an
electronic communication.
III. Possession of Depictions of a Minor Engaged in Sexually Explicit Conduct
The penalty for Possession of Depictions of a Minor Engaged in Sexually Explicit Conduct is
increased by making the offense a class B felony and ranking the offense at seriousness level
VI.
IV. Sex Offenses
Possession of Depictions of Minor Engaged in Sexually Explicit Conduct is designated a sex
offense.
Amended Bill Compared to Second Substitute Bill:
The amended bill makes a technical correction by removing duplicative language regarding
eligibility for the Special Sex Offender Sentencing Alternative.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill has passed, except for section 6, which, because of prior double amendments, takes effect on July 1, 2006. However, section 2 relating to increasing the penalties for Voyeurism and Possession of Depictions of a Minor Engaged in Sexually Explicit Conduct, is null and void unless funded in the budget.
Testimony For: This bill is preventative. Voyeurism, Possession of Depictions of a Minor Engaged in Sexually Explicit Conduct, and Communicating with a Minor for Immoral Purposes, are precursors to more serious sex offenses. These are therefore serious crimes that must be treated seriously.
Testimony Against: People who commit these crimes are not all the same. Some go on to commit more serious offenses and some do not. People possess child pornography for reasons that have nothing to do with a propensity to commit subsequent sex offenses. The current law allows flexibility in how these offenders are sentenced. This bill removes that flexibility. This bill will also lead to disproportionate sentences.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Senator McAuliffe, prime sponsor; and Todd Bowers,
Office of the Attorney General.
(Opposed) David Marshall, Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and
Washington Defenders Association.