HOUSE BILL REPORT
SSB 6365
As Passed House - Amended:
March 1, 2006
Title: An act relating to fees for the weights and measures program.
Brief Description: Changing fees in the weights and measures program.
Sponsors: By Senate Committee on Agriculture & Rural Economic Development (originally sponsored by Senators Rasmussen, Schoesler, Jacobsen, Fraser and Shin; by request of Department of Agriculture).
Brief History:
Economic Development, Agriculture & Trade: 2/17/06, 2/22/06 [DPA].
Floor Activity:
Passed House - Amended: 3/1/06, 97-1.
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill (As Amended by House) |
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AGRICULTURE & TRADE
Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 12 members: Representatives Linville, Chair; Pettigrew, Vice Chair; Appleton, Blake, Chase, Clibborn, Grant, McCoy, Morrell, Quall, P. Sullivan and Wallace.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 11 members: Representatives Kristiansen, Ranking Minority Member; Skinner, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Bailey, Buri, Dunn, Haler, Holmquist, Kilmer, Kretz, Newhouse and Strow.
Staff: Meg Van Schoorl (786-7105).
Background:
The State Department of Agriculture (Department) regulates all commercial weighing,
measuring and counting devices used in the state, except those used in the cities of Spokane
and Seattle which operate their own regulatory programs. Examples of regulated devices
include gasoline pumps, railroad track scales, home heating oil truck meters, grocery store
scales, taxi meters, and truck scales.
The Department's Weights and Measures program inspectors test devices for accuracy and
suitability for service. They also inspect price scanner systems for accuracy; inspect
packaged commodities for correct content, labeling and pricing; and investigate consumer
complaints.
The Weights and Measures program was historically supported by the State General Fund
until 1990 when a system based primarily on inspection fees began. In 1995, the Legislature
established the current funding structure. Businesses are required to pay an annual device
registration fee, according to a statutory fee schedule, ranging from $5 to $800, depending
upon the category of the device. In 2005, 67,600 devices were registered. Ninety-two
percent of these devices cost $5 to register. Revenues from device registration fees in Fiscal
Year 2005 totaled $499,773.
The Department's frequency of inspection and device failure rate each differ significantly
from national averages. For inspection intervals, the national average is 1 - 1.5 years. The
state's average varies depending upon device. The most frequent inspections are of railroad
track scales (2 years), gas pumps (2.5 years), and small scales (once every 3.7 years). Other
devices are rarely, if ever, inspected. For failure rates, the national average is 6.9 percent for
small scales and 6.6 percent for gas pumps, while the failure rates in the last two years for
those same state-inspected devices averaged 9.5 percent and 8.9 percent respectively.
Cities with weights and measures programs may establish their own annual fees as long as
they do not exceed the statutory fee schedule.
Summary of Amended Bill:
Annual registration fees for commercial weighing and measuring devices are increased on a
phased-in basis. Fifty percent of the increase is effective July 1, 2006 and fifty percent is
effective July 1, 2007. Annual application fees for weighmaster/weigher licenses and for
service agent registration certificates/renewals are increased effective July 1, 2006. The
Department must convene its weights and measures advisory committee on a quarterly basis
to monitor implementation of this legislation and together they must report to appropriate
legislative committees on December 1, 2006 if there are any recommended changes. The
Department must also make a status report to the legislature by December 15, 2007.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed, except sections 1 and 3 through 7 which take effect July 1, 2006, and section 2 which takes effect July 1, 2007.
Testimony For: (In support) We support this bill because we are concerned about the nearly
9 percent failure rate for gasoline pumps in the last two years. The states of Oregon and
Idaho have inspection frequencies averaging once a year. Oregon's program is supported 100
percent by fees; Idaho's program is a mixture of fees and general fund. Our cities' weights
and measures programs are tied to the statutory fee schedule, and we support this bill as a
good compromise. We like the budget proviso paying for equipment from the State General
Fund. Because the failure rate is often against the retailer, we have no problem with some
increase in fees. The Department's current average inspection frequency is 49 months. Our
request bill would have reduced it to 24 months. This bill, assuming a supplemental budget
appropriation for equipment, will reduce it to 28 months; without the supplemental budget
appropriation, this bill will reduce it to 30 months. Inspections take a certain amount of time
per device, so inspecting multiple devices at one site does not save time. The Department's
goal is a fair marketplace and fair competition.
(With concerns) We support most of the elements in the bill, but would favor smaller
increases. Some device categories may require inspection less often than others. We
recommend a 25 percent discount for multiple scales at a single establishment, and believe
that businesses with device problems that necessitate re-inspections should have to pay for
them. Trying to be a small business operator is difficult with the cumulative impact of
separate fees that are enacted by the Legislature. A discount for multiple scales will likely
favor larger retailers. Will the cost be shifted to small business? We would like to revisit the
phased-in approach taken earlier in the House companion bill so that fees are not doubled
overnight.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Senator Rasmussen, prime sponsor; Dave Overstreet, AAA
of Washington; David Foster, City of Seattle; and Mary Beth Lang and Jerry Buendell,
Washington Department of Agriculture.
(With concerns) Bob Gee, Washington Food Industry Association; T.K. Bentler, Washington
Association of Neighborhood Stores; and Charlie Brown, Washington Oil Marketers
Association.