HOUSE BILL REPORT
ESSB 6501
As Reported by House Committee On:
Technology, Energy & Communications
Title: An act relating to the creation of the Washington bioenergy assistance program.
Brief Description: Creating the Washington bioenergy assistance program.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Water, Energy & Environment (originally sponsored by Senators Rockefeller, Poulsen, Morton, Honeyford, Fraser, Regala, Kohl-Welles, Rasmussen, Kline and Keiser; by request of Governor Gregoire).
Brief History:
Technology, Energy & Communications: 2/21/06 [DPA].
Brief Summary of Engrossed Substitute Bill (As Amended by House Committee) |
|
|
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON TECHNOLOGY, ENERGY & COMMUNICATIONS
Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 10 members: Representatives Morris, Chair; Kilmer, Vice Chair; Haler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Ericks, Hankins, Hudgins, Nixon, P. Sullivan, Takko and Wallace.
Staff: Kara Durbin (786-7133).
Background:
State Loan Programs
According to a 2002 study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, there are at least
21 active loan programs in 18 states that provide low-cost financing for renewable energy.
Some programs are funded by revolving loan funds that were established with petroleum
overcharge settlements, while others are funded through annual appropriations, the sale of
bonds, or air-quality noncompliance penalty fees. Total funding for state loan programs
ranges from $200,000 to $200 million per year.
Public Utility Tax
Public and privately-owned utilities are subject to the state public utility tax (PUT). The PUT
is applied to the gross receipts of the business. The tax rate depends on the utility
classification. Utility classifications include: (1) distribution of water; (2) generation/
distribution of electrical power; (3) telegraph companies, distribution of natural gas, and
collection of sewerage; (4) urban transportation and watercraft vessels under 65 feet in
length; and (5) railroads, railroad car companies, motor transportation, and all other public
service businesses. Most of the PUT is deposited in the State General Fund. Certain receipts
are earmarked for the Public Works Assistance Account.
Summary of Amended Bill:
The Energy Freedom Program is established. The stated legislative purpose of the Energy
Freedom Program is to stimulate strategic investment in facilities, infrastructure,
technologies, and research and development that will advance Washington's move towards
energy independence.
Energy Freedom Board
The Energy Freedom Board (Board) is created. Membership of the Board consists of 13
individuals: the director of the Department of Agriculture or the director's designee; the
director of the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (DCTED) or
the director's designee from the DCTED's energy policy division; four members of the
Legislature who serve on committees with jurisdiction over energy issues; and seven
members appointed by the Governor, including one recognized expert in renewable energy,
one representative from Washington State University, one Washington State grower, one
producer of alternative fuels, one public fleet manager, one public buildings manager, and
one sustainable society advocate. Staff support for the Board must be provided by DCTED.
Powers and Duties of the Board
The Board is authorized to accept gifts, grants, or loan of funds or property from any source,
provided that accepting the funds is not a conflict of interest. The Board will develop a
competitive process to solicit proposals for potential funding. Financial assistance may be
awarded by the Board for any of the following types of projects and activities:
biomass, solar, and wind power;
The Board will establish a peer review committee to review all competitive grant proposals
submitted by Washington public research institutions.
Applicants for loans and grants must specify deliverables, including evidence that a proposed
project will result in a positive net energy output, if applicable. Applications must be
prioritized based on the following criteria:
production capacity in Washington;
petroleum fuels and imported energy;
indirectly supporting the commercialization of bioenergy intellectual property into a
commercialized project, or by directly assisting in moving a commercially viable project
into the marketplace for use by Washington citizens; and
The Board may approve loans in an amount of up to $5 million, provided that each loan does
not constitute more than 50 percent of the total project funding. The Board may award grants
to political subdivisions to the extent that a loan is not feasible, provided that no more than
10 percent of all financial assistance awarded by the Board to political subdivisions are in the
form of grants. The Board may also award grants to Washington public research institutions.
Upon receiving financial assistance from the Board, political subdivisions must enter into
appropriate contracts with industry partners involved in the use of the facilities,
infrastructure, or equipment.
The Board may suspend or cancel its loans or grants if a recipient fails to make reasonable
progress towards completing a project, or the recipient has made misrepresentations in any
information furnished to the Board in connection with the project.
Consistent with Article VIII, sections 5 and 7 of the Washington Constitution, the credit of
the state, as well as the credit of counties, cities, towns, and other municipal subdivisions
may not be given or loaned to an individual or company in the administration of grants and
loans under this Act.
Energy Freedom Account
The Energy Freedom Account (Account) is created in the State Treasury. Funds from the
Account may only be spent after appropriation. Expenditures may be used only for loans and
grants to political subdivisions for renewable energy and biofuel development projects and
activities.
The Legislature may authorize a transfer of up to $25 million from the Public Utility Tax for
Fiscal Year 2006 into the Account.
The bill is null and void unless funded in the budget by June 30, 2006. The entire Act
expires on June 30, 2016.
Amended Bill Compared to Engrossed Substitute Bill:
The amended bill strikes all of the provisions of the Senate bill and replaces them with the
provisions of Engrossed Third Substitute House Bill 2939, the Energy Freedom Program.
Under the amended bill, the 13-member Energy Freedom Board, rather than the Department
of Agriculture, will make loan and grant decisions. Eligibility for grant or loan funds is
extended to include research and development of new and renewable energy and biofuel
sources, renewable energy and biofuel development facilities and infrastructure; research and
development to develop markets for alternative fuel byproducts; and loans for commercial
energy audits and retrofits. The amended bill contains fewer criteria that must be met before
a loan or grant may be awarded. Criteria under the amended bill include contribution to
viable bioenergy production; benefits to Washington agriculture; conservation of energy and
reduction of dependence on foreign fuel; assistance in commercialization of bioenergy
projects; environmental benefits; and job creation. The Board is authorized to award loans of
up to $5 million per application. Grants to political subdivisions are limited to 10 percent of
all financial assistance awarded by the Board. Loans are limited to 50 percent of the total
project funding.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available on substitute bill. Fiscal note requested on engrossed substitute on February 21, 2006.
Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill takes effect on July 1, 2006. However, the bill is null and void unless funded in the budget.
Testimony For: This is one of two interlocking requests by Governor Gregoire. This bill is
intended to promote the supply side of the equation to ensure we have adequate in-state
facilities for crushing, storing and distribution of biofuel crops. This is an effort to diversify
our sources of fuel, to have alternatives to petroleum fuel, and to stimulate Washington
agriculture. This bill departs from the House version in that it is strictly limited to assistance
and loans. Another difference is that the Department of Agriculture will be administering it,
which makes sense since it will be the agricultural community that will be the primary
participants.
We prefer the Senate bill; it is an effective and efficient method. However, we also like the
flexibility of House Bill 2939 because it allows for loans and grants. Grants for projects,
such as the feasibility of a mobile crusher, would be very helpful. These bills depend on the
farmers growing the crops. The conversation on these various bioenergy assistance programs
is ongoing. We prefer the Senate bill because it is more tightly focused on the biofuels
industry; it is more targeted.
(With concerns) We have concerns over this money going to political subdivisions rather
than directly to farmers and farming communities. We have other programs in existence that
fund projects that are run on private property. These seemingly violate the State Constitution
with no problems. Farmers can't afford to lose the summer construction season; this money
needs to be available right away
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Senator Rockefeller, prime sponsor; Jay Gordon,
Washington State Dairy Federation; and Matt Steuerwalt, Governor's Office.
(With concerns) Chris Cheney, Washington Fryer Commission and Hop Growers of
Washington.