HOUSE BILL REPORT
SB 6568



As Passed House - Amended:
March 2, 2006

Title: An act relating to animal fighting.

Brief Description: Modifying animal fighting provisions.

Sponsors: By Senators Regala, Carrell and Oke.

Brief History:

Judiciary: 2/22/06 [DPA].

Floor Activity:

Passed House - Amended: 3/2/06, 98-0.

Brief Summary of Bill
(As Amended by House)
  • Amends the crime of animal fighting to include being a spectator of or preparing an animal fight and to add as an element of the crime that certain proscribed conduct be done knowingly.


HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY

Majority Report: Do pass as amended. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Lantz, Chair; Flannigan, Vice Chair; Williams, Vice Chair; Priest, Ranking Minority Member; Rodne, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Kirby, Serben, Springer and Wood.

Staff: Edie Adams (786-7180).

Background:

Animal fighting is an unranked class C felony offense under the state's animal cruelty laws. A person commits the crime of animal fighting if the person does any of the following:

Last session the crime of animal fighting was substantially revised. The crime was increased from a gross misdemeanor to a class C felony and the types of activities that constitute animal fighting were expanded. However, the provision making it a crime to be a spectator at an animal fight was removed.


Summary of Amended Bill:

The crime of animal fighting is amended to require that the person act knowingly with respect to promoting, organizing, conducting, participating in, advertising, performing a service for, transporting spectators to, or serving as a stakeholder for, an animal fight. In addition, the crime is amended to include a person who knowingly is a spectator of or prepares an animal fight. The element of serving as a stakeholder for money wagering is amended to provide that it applies to wagering at any place or building.


Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Not requested.

Effective Date of Amended Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Testimony For: When the law was amended last session, being a spectator of an animal fight was left out because it was thought that "participating" in an animal fight would cover being a spectator. However, from conversations with prosecutors, it appears that needs to be specifically included in the language. Also, it is important to include a "knowingly" requirement so that someone who inadvertently ends up at an animal fight can't be prosecuted.

Testimony Against: None.

Persons Testifying: Carey Morris, Humane Society of the United States.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.