Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
State Government Operations & Accountability Committee | |
HB 1389
Brief Description: Expanding grounds for recall.
Sponsors: Representatives Upthegrove and Schual-Berke.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 2/8/05
Staff: Marsha Reilly (786-7135).
Background:
The State Constitution provides that every elective public officer of the state, except judges of
courts of record, is subject to recall and discharge by the legal voters of the state. Any legal voter
of the state, or political subdivision, may petition the recall and discharge of an elected public
officer for acts of "malfeasance" or "misfeasance" while in office, or for violation of the oath of
office.
The Complaint and Ballot Synopsis:
A complaint must be filed with the same elections officer who received the declaration of
candidacy: either the Secretary of State or the county auditor. The complaint must allege that the
elected official violated his or her oath of office, or committed an act of "malfeasance" or
"misfeasance" while in office, and must include a detailed description of the act alleged,
including the date, location and nature of the act. The complaint must be signed under oath that
the facts alleged are true.
Violation of the oath of office means the failure or wilful neglect by an elected official to
faithfully perform a duty. Malfeasance or misfeasance in office means any wrongful conduct
(whether legal or illegal) that affects, interrupts or interferes with the performance of an official
duty. Additionally, misfeasance in office can mean the performance of a duty in an improper
manner, and malfeasance in office can mean the commission of an unlawful act. When an
official is charged with violating the law, the person filing the complaint must demonstrate not
only that the official intended to commit the act, but also that he or she intended to violate the
law. Officials may not be recalled for discretionary acts unless there is a manifest abuse of
discretion.
The elections officer who receives the recall complaint provides copies to the elected official and
the office that will prepare the ballot synopsis. The Attorney General prepares the ballot
synopsis if the recall complaint is against an elected official whose jurisdiction encompasses
more than one county, and the county prosecuting attorney prepares the ballot synopsis if the
complaint is against an official whose jurisdiction lies within only one county. The ballot
synopsis must be provided to the person who filed the complaint, to the elected official, and to
superior court.
Superior Court:
Within 15 days, a superior court judge must hold a hearing and decide whether the complaint
meets the criteria for recall petitions, and whether the ballot synopsis is adequate. The court does
not consider whether the charges are actually true, but only their sufficiency (whether there is a
factual basis for them and whether, if true, they constitute a violation of the oath of office or an
act of malfeasance or misfeasance while in office). An appeal of a sufficiency decision must be
filed in the Supreme Court and must be heard and decided within 30 days. The court then
certifies the ballot synopsis to the appropriate elections officer: either the Secretary of State or
the county auditor.
Signature Gathering:
The party initiating the recall complaint has 270 days to gather signatures against a statewide
elected official, and 180 days to gather signatures against any other elected official. If the recall
petition is against a state officer, an officer of a first class city, a member of a school board in a
first class city, or a county officer in a county with over 40,000 people, enough signatures must
be gathered to equal 25 percent of the total votes cast for that office at the last election. For all
other recall petitions, including those for state senator or representative, the signature
requirement is 35 percent of the total votes cast for that office at the last election.
The Election:
Once the county auditor or Secretary of State verifies and canvasses the signatures, he or she
certifies the petition and fixes a date for a special election. The special election must be held
between 45 and 60 days after the certification, preferably on an established special election date,
but not anytime between the primary and the general election. If a recall election is scheduled,
the elected official may file a 250-word response to the ballot synopsis, which appears on the
ballot along with the ballot synopsis. If a majority of the votes cast at the recall election are forthe recall of the elected official, he or she shall be recalled and discharged from office. The
office then becomes vacant.
Summary of Bill:
A recall election may be conducted against an elected official who has violated campaign finance
laws in a manner that probably affected the outcome of the election. The existing criteria that
may form the basis for a recall complaint, violation of the oath of office or malfeasance or
misfeasance while in office, are expanded to include violation of campaign finance laws in a
manner that probably affected the outcome of the election.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect on January 1, 2006, if HJR 4203 is approved by voters in the November 2005 general election.