Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Local Government Committee | |
HB 1417
Brief Description: Requiring a vote of the people in specified circumstances before a city may assume jurisdiction over a water-sewer district.
Sponsors: Representatives Takko, Schindler, Chase, Miloscia, Ahern, B. Sullivan and Woods.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/7/05
Staff: Thamas Osborn (786-7129).
Background:
Current law sets forth legislative and electoral mechanisms, based upon geographic location and
property valuation, for the assumption of jurisdiction of water-sewer districts (districts) by cities
or towns.
Whenever all of the territory of a district is located within the corporate boundaries of a city, the
city legislative body may adopt a resolution or ordinance to assume jurisdiction over the entire
district.
Whenever a portion of a district equal to at least 60 percent of its area, or 60 percent of the
assessed valuation of the real property lying within the district, is included within the corporate
boundaries of a city, the city may assume by ordinance the full and complete management and
control of that portion of the entire district not included within another city. Related statutes
specify that under certain circumstances the district may, upon a favorable vote of a majority of
all voters within the district, require a city to assume responsibility for the operation and
maintenance of the district's property, facilities and equipment throughout the entire district.
Whenever the portion of a district included within the corporate boundaries of a city is less than
60 percent of the area of the district and less than 60 percent of the assessed valuation of the real
property within the district, the city may assume, by ordinance, jurisdiction of the district's
responsibilities, property, facilities and equipment within the corporate limits of the city. The
city may also assume responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the district's property,
facilities and equipment throughout the entire district upon a favorable vote of a majority of all
voters within the district.
Whenever more than one city, in whole or in part, is included within a district, the city which has
within its boundaries 60 percent or more of the area of the assessed valuation of the district may,
with the approval of any other city containing part of such district, assume responsibility for
operation and maintenance of the district's property, facilities and equipment within such other
city.
Summary of Bill:
Voter approval of the asssumption of jurisdiction of a water-sewer district by a city.
A city may not assume the jurisdiction over a water-sewer district serving a population greater
than 1,000 residents and containing, within its boundaries, the territory of two or more cities, or
one city and unincorporated territory, unless voters of the entire water-sewer district approve a
ballot proposition authorizing the assumption. The cost of the election must be borne by the city
seeking to assume such jurisdiction. The approval of the voters in a water-sewer district is not
required if the board of commissioners of the water-sewer district consents to the assumption of
jurisdiction by the city or town;
Feasibility study requirement.
A feasibility study is required regarding a proposed assumption of jurisdiction prior to the matter
being subject to a decision by the voters in the water-sewer district. This feasibility study must
comply with specified criteria and procedural conditions, including:
A feasibility study is not necessary if the board of commissioners of the water-sewer district
consents to the assumption of jurisdiction by the city or town.
Limitations on the jurisdiction of Boundary Review Boards.
A Boundary Review Board is denied jurisdiction to review an attempted or completed
assumption that has been subject to a vote by the voters in the water-sewer district and which
involves not more than one city.
Applicability of the act.
The provisions of the act are applicable to assumptions of jurisdiction that are pending as of the
effective date of the act, or which are initiated on or after such date.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 4, 2005.
Effective Date: The bill contains an emergency clause and takes effect immediately.