Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Local Government Committee | |
HB 1639
Brief Description: Requiring consideration of water quality during growth management planning.
Sponsors: Representatives Upthegrove, Dickerson, Moeller, Dunshee, Sells, B. Sullivan, Simpson, Lantz, Williams, O'Brien, Hunt and Chase.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/15/05
Staff: Ethan Moreno (786-7386).
Background:
Growth Management Act
Enacted in 1990 and 1991, the Growth Management Act (GMA) establishes a comprehensive
land use planning framework for county and city governments in Washington. The GMA
specifies numerous provisions for jurisdictions fully planning under the Act (GMA jurisdictions)
and establishes a reduced number of compliance requirements for all local governments.
The GMA requires all local governments to designate and protect critical areas. Critical areas are
defined by statute to include wetlands, aquifer recharge areas, fish and wildlife habitat
conservation areas, frequently flooded areas, and geologically hazardous areas.
GMA jurisdictions must adopt internally consistent comprehensive land use plans
(comprehensive plans), which are generalized, coordinated land use policy statements of the
governing body. Comprehensive plans must satisfy requirements for specified "elements," each
of which is a planning subset of a comprehensive plan. The land use and rural elements include
requirements for the protection of certain ground and surface waters. GMA jurisdictions also
must adopt development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive
plan.
The adopted comprehensive plans and the corresponding development regulations must be
consistent with 14 planning goals established in the GMA. The planning goals, which are listed
in a non-prioritized order, must be used for the purpose of guiding the development of
comprehensive plans and development regulations. The goals include provisions for protecting
the environment, including water quality and the availability of water.
Comprehensive plans and development regulations are subject to continuing review and
evaluation by the adopting county or city. GMA jurisdictions must review and, if needed, revise
their comprehensive plans and development regulations according to a cyclical seven-year
statutory schedule. Jurisdictions that are not fully planning under the GMA must satisfy
requirements pertaining to critical areas and natural resource lands according to this same
schedule.
In addition to other planning requirements, counties that comply with the major requirements of
the GMA must designate urban growth areas (UGAs) or areas within which urban growth must
be encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature. "Urban
growth," as described in the GMA, refers, in part, to growth that makes intensive use of land for
the location of buildings, structures, and impermeable surfaces to such a degree as to be
incompatible with the primary use of land for certain agricultural, mineral, and resources uses.
Summary of Bill:
Counties whose territory includes Hood Canal, Puget Sound, the Strait of Juan de Fuca, or the
Pacific Ocean and the cities and towns in those counties (qualifying saltwater jurisdictions) must
satisfy new water related planning requirements. Qualifying saltwater jurisdictions must
consider the following when preparing comprehensive plans and development regulations
according to the Growth Management Act (GMA) and when reviewing such plans and
regulations as provided by law:
When designating and protecting critical areas according to the GMA, qualifying saltwater
jurisdictions must consider measures to maintain water quality at a level allowing water bodies to
support desirable and feasible existing and futures uses.
Qualifying saltwater jurisdictions may not designate urban growth areas on marine shorelines not
already occupied by urban growth unless the designation is necessary for water-dependent or
water-related uses.
Qualifying saltwater jurisdictions must implement the new water related planning requirements
according to the seven-year review and revision schedule of the GMA.
Nothing in the provisions specifying the new water related requirements are intended to affect the
requirements or provisions of specified state and federal water laws.
Legislative intent language is included.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 15, 2005.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.