HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1661
As Reported by House Committee On:
Juvenile Justice & Family Law
Title: An act relating to transfer of juvenile proceedings.
Brief Description: Specifying procedures for transfer of juvenile proceedings.
Sponsors: Representatives Moeller, Hasegawa, Appleton, Hunt, Ericks, Chase, Curtis, Lovick, McCune and Cody.
Brief History:
Juvenile Justice & Family Law: 2/15/05, 2/23/05 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUVENILE JUSTICE & FAMILY LAW
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Dickerson, Chair; Moeller, Vice Chair; McDonald, Ranking Minority Member; McCune, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Crouse, Lovick and Roberts.
Staff: Sonja Hallum (786-7092).
Background:
Venue refers to the particular county, or geographical area, in which a court with jurisdiction
may hear and determine a case. It relates only to the question in which geographical location
of a case may be heard. Venue does not refer to jurisdiction, which is the inherent power to
hear a case.
In juvenile court, the venue of a juvenile offender matter is in any county in which any
element of the offense was committed. A juvenile court has the authority to transfer a case to
a different county for supervision and enforcement of the disposition order if the offender is
residing in that county. The receiving county has the authority to modify and enforce the
disposition order.
The juvenile court may also order a transfer of venue if the court has reason to believe that an
impartial proceeding cannot be held in the county in which the proceeding began.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
If a court orders a case to be transferred to a different county for disposition in a juvenile
offender proceeding, the case and copies of legal and social documents pertaining to the case
must be transferred to the county in which the juvenile resides, regardless of whether or not
the juvenile's custodial parent resides in that county. Once transferred, the receiving county
will monitor and enforce the disposition in the case.
If restitution has not been determined in the case, the case may be transferred to the receiving
county; however, the restitution must be established by the originating county. Once the
restitution order is entered, the originating county will send the restitution order to the
receiving county for enforcement.
The juvenile must make payments for the restitution, and other legal financial obligations, to
the originating county who will maintain the account receivable in the judicial information
system. The probation officer in the receiving county will manage collection of the payments
while the offender is on probation. Once probation ends, the probation department must
notify the clerk of the originating county who will then be responsible for managing the
payments.
The receiving county has the authority to modify the disposition and restitution orders.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The substitute bill clarifies that the provisions pertaining to the transfer of the case and copies
of the court files relate only to cases that are transferred for disposition.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: (In support on original bill) Currently, if a youth lives in a different county supervision can be transferred, but there is no authority to sanction the youth for violations. There are problems with the current system. A case can't be transferred until restitution is determined and this can take months. During this time there is no supervision of a youth. This bill bifurcates the case and allows the case to be transferred separately from the restitution. There is also a difference in how the counties in Washington are interpreting this statute. The bill clarifies the process and makes it consistent. There shouldn't be a fiscal impact to any counties.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: (In support on original bill) Phil Jans, Washington Association of Juvenile Court Administrators.