HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1689
As Reported by House Committee On:
Health Care
Title: An act relating to dental health services.
Brief Description: Concerning dental health services.
Sponsors: Representatives Cody, Moeller, Appleton, Morrell, Clibborn, Green, Kenney, Murray, Schual-Berke and Chase.
Brief History:
Health Care: 2/18/05, 2/28/05 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH CARE
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 15 members: Representatives Cody, Chair; Campbell, Vice Chair; Morrell, Vice Chair; Bailey, Ranking Minority Member; Curtis, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Alexander, Appleton, Clibborn, Condotta, Green, Hinkle, Lantz, Moeller, Schual-Berke and Skinner.
Staff: Chris Blake (786-7392).
Background:
Applicants for a license to practice dentistry in Washington must present evidence of
graduation from a dental school approved by the Dental Quality Assurance Commission
(Commission) and pass an examination approved by the Commission. The examination
consists of both written and practical components. The practical component is met through
the Western Regional Examining Board's clinical examination which must be completed
within five years of applying for a license.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
An applicant for a license to practice dentistry may replace the practical examination
requirement for obtaining a license by satisfactorily completing a postdoctoral residency
program in a community health clinic that serves predominantly low-income patients or is
located in a dental care health professional shortage area in Washington. The residency must
last for at least one year and must be approved by the Commission. The Commission must
establish criteria for the sponsoring clinics to use when sponsoring residents, including
guidelines for supervising and evaluating residents.
The act becomes null and void if not funded in the Budget.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The substitute bill requires that the residency program include an outcome assessment of the
resident's competence. The University of Washington's role in developing criteria for the
community clinics is removed. The exemption of dental services from the health care
services contractor tax is restored. The act becomes null and void if not funded in the
Budget.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed. However, the bill is null and void unless funded in the budget.
Testimony For: This bill will allow recent dental school graduates to become much more skilled at their practice and will predispose them to practicing in underserved areas. This bill will result in more patients receiving preventive dental services and reduce the number of emergency room visits for dental care.
Testimony Against: The tax increase in Washington will affect those health carriers who are also licensed in other states. The tax increase will hurt the competitiveness of those health carriers that only provide dental services. This bill has the wrong source of funding.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Linda Hull and Dr. Dan Middang, Washington State Dental
Association; and Dr. Martin Lieberman, Puget Sound Neighborhood Health Centers.
(Opposed) Rick Wickman, Premera Blue Cross; Nancee Wildermuth, Regence Blue Shield,
PacifiCare, and Aetna; and Denny Eliason and Sean P. Pickard, Washington Dental Service.