Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Natural Resources, Ecology & Parks Committee | |
HB 1731
Brief Description: Requiring the removal of mercury components from end-of-life motor vehicles.
Sponsors: Representatives Hunt, Campbell, Wood, Nixon, Clibborn, Jarrett, McDermott, Blake, Williams, Pettigrew, Dickerson, Dunshee, Lovick, Upthegrove, Moeller, Darneille, Kenney, McCoy, Chase, Ormsby, Simpson, Miloscia and Schual-Berke.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/15/05
Staff: Jason Callahan (786-7117).
Background:
Certain products with mercury-added components are now, or will be soon, prohibited from sale
within the state. These include florescent lamps, novelties, thermostats, and certain types of
medical equipment. New motor vehicles with an automotive mercury switch will be prohibited
from sale in Washington on January 1, 2006.
Summary of Bill:
Prohibitions
It is unlawful for a vehicle to be shredded or crushed if all mercury-added components that can
be removed have not been removed. Automobile crushers and shredders may rely on reasonable
evidence provided by motor vehicle recyclers that all mercury-added products have been
removed. Vehicles imported from out of state may only be shredded if the recycler can ensure
that the out-of-state supplier has removed all mercury-added components.
It is also unlawful for a person to falsely represent that mercury-added components have been
removed from a vehicle.
Role of manufacturers in the recovery of mercury-added components
Every vehicle manufacturer is responsible for ensuring the recovery of at least 90% of the
mercury-added components from cars that are at the end of their useful life. To accomplish this,
each manufacturer is required to develop and implement a plan for the removal, collection, and
recovery of mercury-added components from vehicles within 90 days of the legislation's effective
date.
There are certain minimum elements that are required in the recovery plan. These include:
In addition to the plan, the manufacturer must submit annual reports to the Department. These
reports must contain documentation of the capture rate for the mercury-added components, how
the mercury was managed, and how the capture rate will be approved.
Manufacturers are responsible for the costs of recovering mercury-added components, including
labor, shipping, training, and costs to the state for administration. In addition, manufacturers
must hold harmless the recyclers for any liability that arises from the release of mercury from
components that have been returned for recovery.
Role of the state in the recovery of mercury-added components
The Director of the Department is required to review and approve all plans submitted from motor
vehicle manufacturers. Upon the receipt of a plan, the Director has 60 days to review the plan for
compliance with all requirements. If the plan meets these requirements, then its implementation
must begin within 90 days of the Director's approval. If the plan is rejected by the Director, then
the manufacturer must submit a new plan within 30 days of notification.
If a manufacturer is not able to submit an approved plan with 240 days of the effective date of the
legislation, then the Director must consider the manufacturer to be in violation of the law. This
violation would trigger the enforcement provisions established in the legislation.
All approved plans must be reviewed every three years.
Enforcement
Violations of this legislation are punishable by a civil penalty up to $1,000 per violation per day.
Money collected is directed towards the state toxics control account.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on 2/8/05.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.