FINAL BILL REPORT
2SHB 1758
C 487 L 05
Synopsis as Enacted
Brief Description: Revising public disclosure law.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Kessler, Nixon, Haigh, Chandler, Clements, Schindler, Hunt, Hunter, Hinkle, Takko, B. Sullivan, Miloscia, Buck and Shabro; by request of Attorney General).
House Committee on State Government Operations & Accountability
House Committee on Appropriations
Senate Committee on Government Operations & Elections
Background:
The Public Disclosure Act (PDA) requires all state and local government agencies to make
all public records available for public inspection and copying unless they fall within certain
statutory exemptions. The provisions requiring public records disclosure must be interpreted
liberally and the exceptions narrowly in order to effectuate a general policy favoring
disclosure.
For example, records that are relevant to a controversy to which a state or local agency is a
party, but would not be available to another party under the superior court rules of pretrial
discovery, are exempt from public disclosure. The Washington Supreme Court has defined
"relevant to a controversy" as "completed, existing, or reasonably anticipated litigation."
Dawson v. Daly, 120 Wn.2d 782, 791 (1993).
I. Requirements for Maintaining Records
Public records must be made available for inspection and copying during normal office hours.
State and local agencies may make reasonable rules and regulations to provide full access to
public records, to protect public records from damage, and to prevent excessive interference
with other essential functions of the agencies.
State and local agencies are required to maintain indexes providing identifying information
regarding certain records. Local agencies do not have to provide an index if doing so would
be unduly burdensome. However, such local agencies must issue and publish a formal order
specifying the reasons maintaining an index would be unduly burdensome and make
available any indexes maintained for agency use.
II. Responding to Requests
An agency must respond to requests for public records promptly. Within five business days
of a request, an agency must:
The Washington Supreme Court recently ruled that a public agency does not have to comply
with an overbroad request. Hangartner v. City of Seattle, 151 Wn.2d 439, 448 (2004).
According to the court, a proper request for public records "must identify with reasonable
clarity those documents that are desired, and a party cannot satisfy this requirement by simply
requesting all of an agency's documents" (emphasis original). Id.
III. Copying Public Records
An agency must allow the public to use its facilities for copying public records unless to do
so would unreasonably disrupt the operation of the agency. An agency may not charge for
locating public documents and making them available for copying. However, an agency may
impose a reasonable charge for providing copies of public records and for the use of agency
equipment. Charges for photocopying may not exceed the actual per page cost published by
the agency. If the agency has not published a per page costs for copying, the costs may not
exceed 15 cents per page.
IV. Judicial Remedies
A person who is denied a public record or who believes an agency's time estimate is
unreasonable may appeal the agency decision in the superior court of the county in which the
record is maintained. In such court actions, the agency has the burden to prove, by a
preponderance of the evidence, that the agency action was valid. If the person prevails in the
action, he or she must be awarded all costs of maintaining the action, including reasonable
attorney fees.
Summary:
I. Requirements for Maintaining Records
By February 1, 2006, the Attorney General must adopt an advisory model rule for state and
local agencies addressing:
II. Responding to Requests
An agency may not reject or ignore requests to inspect or copy public records solely on the
grounds that the request is overly broad. The agency may make records available on a partial
or installment basis as records that are part of a larger set of requested records are assembled
or made ready for inspection or disclosure.
Every state and local agency must appoint and publicly identify an individual whose
responsibility is to serve as a point of contact for members of the public in requesting
disclosure of public records and to oversee the agency's compliance with the public records
disclosure requirements of the PDA. An agency's public records officer may appoint an
employee or official of another agency as its public records officer. State agencies must
publish contact information regarding the public records officer in the state register. Local
agencies must publish the contact information in a manner reasonably calculated to give
notice to the public.
III. Copying Public Records
An agency may require a deposit not to exceed 10 percent of the estimated cost of providing
copies of a request and may charge a person per installment. An agency may cease fulfilling
a request if an installment is not claimed or received.
IV. Judicial Remedies
An action against a county involving a person who is denied a public record or who believes
an agency's time estimate is unreasonable may be brought in the superior court of the county
or in either of the two judicial districts nearest to the county. Any action involving a person
who is denied a public record or believes an agency's time estimate is unreasonable must be
filed within one year of the agency's claim of exemption or the last production of a record on
a partial or installment basis.
Votes on Final Passage:
House 89 6
Senate 42 4 (Senate amended)
House (House refused to concur)
Senate (Senate receded)
Senate 47 0 (Senate amended)
House 97 0 (House concurred)
Effective: July 24, 2005