Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Technology, Energy & Communications Committee | |
HB 1800
Brief Description: Requiring the utilities and transportation commission's adjudicative proceedings be open.
Sponsors: Representatives Kilmer, Crouse and Chase.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/17/05
Staff: Kara Durbin (786-7133).
Background:
The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC) is a three-member board
who, along with a staff of over 150 people, regulate the rates, services, and practices of privately
owned utilities and transportation companies. These companies include electric, telephone,
natural gas distribution, private water, solid waste collection, commercial ferries, and low-level
radioactive waste disposal.
Commissioners are appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate for six-year terms.
Commission staff includes accountants, auditors, economists, engineers, consumer complaint
specialists, enforcement officers, and investigators. The staff is organized into three main
divisions: regulatory, advisory, and administrative services. The WUTC is primarily an
economic regulator with some public safety responsibility for in-state pipelines and railroads.
In a rate case proceeding before the WUTC, the WUTC acts as a quasi-judicial fact finding
tribunal to hear and decide cases. These hearings are formal legal proceedings. The main parties
in most rate cases are Commission staff, the company, and ratepayers, who are represented by the
Public Counsel Section of the Attorney General's Office. Other groups may intervene if they can
demonstrate an interest in the case.
The WUTC supports parties' informal efforts to resolve disputes through alternative dispute
resolution (ADR), so long as doing so is lawful and consistent with the public interest. The
WUTC may invite or direct the parties to confer among themselves, or with a designated person.
Settlement conferences must be informal and without prejudice to the rights of the parties. Any
resulting settlement or stipulation must be submitted to the WUTC in writing and is subject to
approval by the Commission.
In conducting a settlement negotiation, the parties determine the ground rules governing the
negotiation. Commission staff is authorized to participate fully in any settlement negotiations.
No statement, admission, or offer of settlement made during negotiations is admissible in
evidence in any formal hearing before the WUTC without the consent of the participants. Parties
may agree that information exchanged exclusively within the context of settlement negotiations
will be treated as confidential. In addition, participants in a commission-sanctioned ADR
process must periodically advise any nonparticipating parties and the WUTC of any substantial
progress made towards settlement.
Summary of Bill:
Notice
Commission staff of the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC) must
notify the administrative law judge (ALJ) and all parties on the master service list of a proposed
settlement conference 10 days prior to holding a settlement conference. Commission staff must
also file notice of the impending negotiation with the secretary. If a pre-hearing conference has
not yet been held in the case, Commission staff must send notice to all persons who regularly
appear before the WUTC in similar adjudicative proceedings. The notice shall contain a general
description of the issues and certification that all appropriate persons and parties are being
notified.
The ALJ must review the notice to ensure that all the appropriate persons have been notified.
The ALJ may also take any action necessary to protect the rights of persons participating or
desiring to participate. In addition, the ALJ must report the results of the procedural review to
the commission.
Any party who has received notice under this section may attend a settlement conference.
Additional notice of continuing settlement conferences involving the same issue need only be
provided to the parties attending the initial conference, or to those who have requested continuing
notice.
Nonunanimous Settlements
If a nonunanimous settlement or stipulation is presented to the WUTC, the WUTC may not
dismiss the nonsettling parties as parties to the case or otherwise restrict their participation in the
case. The WUTC also may not deny the nonsettling parties the right to conduct discovery,
present evidence, hold a hearing, cross-examine witnesses, and present arguments on all disputed
material issues of fact and law.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.