Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Judiciary Committee | |
HB 1829
Title: An act relating to records of conviction for misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor offenses.
Brief Description: Adjusting provisions relating to records of conviction.
Sponsors: Representatives Appleton, Lantz, Lovick, Hasegawa, Flannigan, Moeller, Darneille, McCoy and Simpson.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/15/05
Staff: Erik Van Hagen (786-5793).
Background:
In 2001, the Legislature permitted misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor offenses to be vacated
by court order once the offender had completed all the terms of his or her sentence. The court is
prohibited from vacating a record if: (1) the applicant has criminal charges pending; (2) the
offense was a violent offense or an attempt to commit a violent offense; (3) the offense was a
violation of driving under the influence (DUI) or other DUI related crimes; (4) the offense
involved obscenity, pornography, or sexual exploitation of a child; (5) the offense involved
domestic violence (unless certain conditions are met); (6) the applicant has been convicted of a
new crime in Washington, another state, or in federal court since the date of conviction; (7) fewer
than three years have passed since the applicant completed the terms of his or her sentence
(except for domestic violence related misdemeanors); and (8) the applicant is currently restrained
or has been restrained in the last five years by a domestic violence protection order, no-contact
order, antiharassment protection order, or other civil restraining order.
A record is vacated by the court by (a) permitting the applicant to change their plea from guilty to
not guilty; (b) setting aside the guilty verdict; or (c) dismissing the information or indictment
against the offender and vacating the judgments and sentences.
Vacated Misdemeanor and Gross Misdemeanor Records
Following the vacation of a criminal record, the applicant may state he or she has never been
convicted of that crime for all purposes, including employment applications. The order vacating
the conviction will be transmitted to the Washington state patrol and local law enforcement to
ensure the records reflect the order to vacate. The conviction record cannot be disclosed to
anyone except criminal justice agencies and may not be used as "criminal history" for purposes of
sentencing for a subsequent offense. However, the prior conviction may be used in a later
prosecution.
Sealed Records
Courts may seal court files or records pursuant to statute or court rule. Washington Court
General Rule 15 (GR 15) authorizes the court to seal records when authorized by statute or when
compelling circumstances are shown. When a record is sealed, it is protected from examination
by the public or nonauthorized court personnel. If the file is a paper or microform document, this
is done by placing a seal on the file that must be broken in order to gain access. If the file is
computerized, it is sealed by limiting access only to authorized court personnel.
Compelling Circumstances as Justification for Sealing Records
In the case of Personal Restraint Petition of Gentry, the Washington Supreme Court stated that
the requirement of compelling circumstances for sealing records is mandated by the Washington
Constitution's requirement for open administration of justice (Article I § 10). Allowing sealing
of records without compelling circumstances may raise constitutional issues. No case law is
directly on point regarding whether less than compelling circumstances can be demonstrated
when sealing records pursuant to state statute. However, case law suggests that at a minimum,
courts will conduct some analysis that would include consideration of the need for sealing the
record weighed against the public's interest in open access to the files.
Summary of Bill:
When a conviction record is vacated by a court, the court may seal the file without a
demonstration of compelling circumstances. The order to seal may provide for the deletion of
the applicant's name in the case index to be substituted with his or her initials.
The prohibition of permitting the vacation of records of applicants who have had the record of
another conviction vacated is removed. A subsequent conviction is only a bar to having a
conviction vacated if fewer than three years have passed since the person completed the terms of
the sentence for the new offense.
The bill makes several technical corrections to the current statute, specifically changing terms
from singular to plural.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 9, 2005.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.