Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Commerce & Labor Committee | |
HB 1875
Brief Description: Using the retrospective rating program to improve worker safety.
Sponsors: Representatives Fromhold, Conway, Campbell, Wood, McCoy, Hunt, Simpson, Ormsby, Williams, Kenney, Chase, Moeller, Hasegawa and Cody.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/15/05
Staff: Jill Reinmuth (786-7134).
Background:
In the late 1970s and the early 1980s, the Department of Labor and Industries (Department)
developed and implemented a retrospective rating plan for groups of employers. This plan
allowed groups of employers to assume a portion of industrial insurance risk. A group could
agree that, following a policy period, premiums would be adjusted based on the group's actual
losses during the policy period. The group would receive a refund if injury costs decreased, or an
assessment if injury costs increased.
In 1980, as part of the development of the retrospective rating plan, the Legislature enacted
Senate Bill 3169 (Laws of 1980, Chapter 129). This legislation authorized the Department to
insure employers as a group under certain conditions, including the following:
This legislation also authorized the Department to consider an employer group as a single entity
for purposes of dividends or premium discounts.
In 1999 the Department requested and the Legislature enacted Senate Bill 6048 (Laws of 1999,
Chapter 7). This legislation required the Department to offer a retrospective rating plan for
groups of employers. This legislation also required the following:
Summary of Bill:
With regard to the Department of Labor and Industries' (Department's) retrospective rating
program, provisions on how groups may use certain funds are added, and provisions on who may
be added to or continue to be part of certain retrospective rating groups are modified.
Funds
The following funds must be used to administer a retrospective rating group's program or be
retained as reserves to meet any future assessments:
The funds used to administer the retrospective rating group's programs may be used only to pay
for expenses directly related to substantially improving worker safety, accident prevention, and
worker outcomes. These expenses may include safety education, risk management, claims
monitoring, and return-to-work program-related assistance, as well as legal and
investment-related expenses. Any funds not used for these purposes must be returned to the
group's members.
If a retrospective rating group is disqualified from or does not reenroll in the plan, reserves
maintained by the group's sponsor must be used to administer the group's program or pay the
group's final obligations. Any reserves not used for these purposes must be returned to the
group's members.
Each group's sponsor must report annually to the Department on funds used to administer the
group's programs and retained as reserves to meet future assessments, and on expenses directly
related to substantially improving worker safety, accident prevention, and worker outcomes. The
Department must periodically inspect and review records of sponsors.
The Department may consider a group as a single employing entity for purposes of incentive
payments to recognize substantial improvements in worker safety, accident prevention, and
worker outcomes (instead of dividends or premium discounts).
Membership
Before allowing a group to participate in the retrospective rating program, the Department must
ensure that certain criteria are met. The criteria include that the group be composed of
employers, a majority of whom are classified in the same two-digit North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) classification.
An employer that is a member of an existing group may continue in that group even if the
employer is not classified in the same two-digit NAICS classification as a majority of employers
in the group. However, the employer may not continue in the group if, during any future
enrollment period, they are classified in the same two-digit NAICS classification as a majority of
employers in a different group.
An employer that is proposed for addition to a group must be classified in the same two-digit
NAICS classification as a majority of employers in the group. However, the employer may be
added to the group composed of the most similar employers if the employer is not classified in
the same two-digit NAICS classification as a majority of employers in any group.
Rule-Making Authority: The bill does not contain provisions addressing the rule-making
powers of an agency.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 10, 2005.
Effective Date: The bill declares an emergency, and provides for an immediate effective date.