Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Select Committee on Hood Canal Committee | |
HB 1896
Brief Description: Limiting geoduck harvest in parts of Hood Canal.
Sponsors: Representatives Appleton, Eickmeyer, Chase and Haigh.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 2/17/05
Staff: Caroleen Dineen (786-7156).
Background:
Harvest Management Plans
Geoduck resources and the commercial geoduck fishery are generally managed jointly by the
Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and the Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The MOU gives the WDFW primary
responsibility for conducting resource assessments and setting the total amount of geoduck that
can be harvested annually. The DNR has primary responsibility according to the MOU for
managing the state harvest and sale of geoducks, including planning and location of state sales.
Pursuant to a federal district court decision, Washington shares management authority over the
geoduck fishery with tribal co-managers. US v. Washington, 873 F. Supp 1422 (1994) [often
referred to as the "Rafeedie decision" after the judge who decided the case]. The Rafeedie
decision and a later decision [US v. Washington, 898 F. Supp 1453 (1995)], describe how the
court expects the state and the tribes to share equal portions of the sustainable harvest biomass of
any shellfish species, including geoduck. The state and tribal co-managers are directed by the
court to enter into management plans to implement the decision and to comply with the terms of
all management plans.
WDFW and DNR agreed in the MOU to jointly represent the state delegation in conversations
with area tribes concerning the state-tribal management of the subtidal geoduck fishery. Both
state agencies agreed to work together in adopting a unified state position on geoduck
management prior to presenting the state position to the tribal co-managers. The signatures of
both state agency directors appear on management plans entered into by the state and tribes.
Hood Canal Low Dissolved Oxygen
Hood Canal is a glacier-carved fjord approximately 60 miles in length with approximately 180
miles of shoreline. Portions of Hood Canal have had low dissolved oxygen concentrations for
many years. The University of Washington (UW) recorded low dissolved oxygen concentrations
in the 1950s. In recent years, low dissolved oxygen concentration conditions and significant fish
death events have been recorded on Hood Canal. The 2004 dissolved oxygen concentrations in
southern Hood Canal were the lowest recorded concentrations for the water body.
Research and monitoring related to Hood Canal's low dissolved oxygen concentrations is being
conducted. In May 2004 the Puget Sound Action Team and the Hood Canal Coordinating
Council published a report - the Preliminary Assessment and Corrective Plan (PACA) - assessing
sources of nitrogen introduced into Hood Canal. Federal, state, regional, and local agencies and
organizations are conducting Hood Canal monitoring and research. In addition, a group of 20
federal, state, local, and tribal agencies and nonprofit organizations have established the Hood
Canal Dissolved Oxygen Program (HCDOP), a three-year effort to coordinate Hood Canal
monitoring, analysis, and modeling.
Summary of Bill:
Prohibitions and restrictions on management plans for harvest of naturally occurring geoducks
below the mean low tide line are specified. The WDFW and the DNR may not enter or reenter
into a management plan with a state or nonstate entity authorizing this type of harvest in the
Hood Canal south of a line projected from South Point in Jefferson County and Lofall in Kitsap
County. In the Hood Canal north of the South Point - Lofall line and south of a line projected
from Tala Point in Jefferson County and Foulweather Bluff in Kitsap County, these state
agencies may not enter or reenter into a management plan with a state or nonstate entity allowing
for such a harvest in an amount greater than 90% of the 2000-2004 average harvest level for that
area.
The Fish and Wildlife Commission (Commission) may adopt a rule authorizing a harvest that
would be otherwise prohibited or restricted under certain conditions. A majority of the
Commission must affirm that:a mapping inventory of the naturally occurring geoducks in the Hood Canal south of the Tala
Point - Foulweather Bluff line has been completed;
If a majority of the Commission affirms the required findings, a summary of the research considered must be submitted to the appropriate committees of the Legislature. The Commission rule may not take effect until 30 days after adjournment of the legislative session in which the research summary is submitted.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 16, 2005.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.