HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1933



         As Reported by House Committee On:       
Financial Institutions & Insurance

Title: An act relating to reporting and analysis of medical malpractice related information.

Brief Description: Requiring the reporting and analysis of medical malpractice related information.

Sponsors: Representatives Schual-Berke, Morrell and Lantz.

Brief History:

Financial Institutions & Insurance: 2/17/05, 3/1/05 [DPS].

Brief Summary of Substitute Bill
  • Requires insuring entities and self-insurers to report certain data regarding medical malpractice claims. Health care providers and health care facilities must report the data if the information is not reported by an insuring entity or self-insurer.
  • Requires a claimant or their attorney to report certain data regarding medical malpractice claims.
  • Requires the Insurance Commissioner to aggregate information and make the information available by March 31 of each year.
  • Requires the Insurance Commissioner to develop an annual report analyzing the medical malpractice information and the medical malpractice market by June 30 of each year.
  • Provides rule-making authority to implement the chapter and protect identifiable information.
  • Creates a new section in Chapter 42.17 RCW to exempt any information that may result in the identification of a claimant, provider, health care facility, or self-insurer from public disclosure.


HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS & INSURANCE

Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Kirby, Chair; Ericks, Vice Chair; Tom, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Santos, Schual-Berke, Simpson and Williams.

Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 4 members: Representatives Roach, Ranking Minority Member; Newhouse, Serben and Strow.

Staff: Jon Hedegard (786-7127).

Background:

The Insurance Commissioner (Commissioner) is responsible for the licensing and regulation of insurance companies doing business in this state. This includes insurers offering coverage for medical malpractice. Current law does not require insurers, including medical malpractice insurers, to file underwriting standards. In addition, the Commissioner does not receive information about medical malpractice claims, judgments, or settlements.

Under current law, rates and forms are subject to public disclosure when the filing becomes effective. Actuarial formulas, statistics, and assumptions submitted in support of a filing are not subject to public disclosure.


Summary of Substitute Bill:

"Insuring entity" includes:

Beginning on April 1, 2006, self-insurers and insuring entities that write medical malpractice insurance must report any closed claim resulting in judgments, settlements, or no payment to the Insurance Commissioner within 60 days after the claim is closed. If an insurer does not report to the Commissioner because of a policy limitation, the provider or facility must report a claim to the Commissioner. The Commissioner may impose a fine against insuring entities who fail to report of up to $250 per day up to a total of $10,000. The Department of Health may impose a fine against a facility or provider that fails to report of up to $250 per day up to a total of $10,000.

Reports by insuring entities and self-insurers.
The reports must contain data, including:

Aggregate summary of data.
The Commissioner must prepare aggregate statistical summaries of closed claims. The summaries must be available by March 31 of each year. Information in an individual closed claim is confidential and not subject to public disclosure.

Annual report.
The Commissioner must prepare an annual report of closed claims based on calendar year data and the annual financial reports of insurers by June 30 of each year. The Commissioner must post a report to the internet within 30 days after it is due. The report must include:   

Rule-making.

Claimants and their attorneys.
A claimant or their attorney must report to the Commissioner the amount of any court costs, attorneys' fees, or costs of expert witnesses.

Public disclosure exemption.
A new section is added to Chapter 42.17 RCW to exempt any information that may result in the identification of a claimant, provider, health care facility, or self-insurer from public disclosure.

Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:

The substitute bill allows the Commissioner to prescribe the "coding" of data. The Commissioner is required to analyze any National Association of Insurance Commissioner model standards on medical malpractice. The analysis must be reported to the relevant legislative committees along with any proposed legislative changes. A new section is added to Chapter 42.17 RCW to exempt any information that may result in the identification of a claimant, provider, health care facility, or self-insurer from public disclosure.


Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Not requested.

Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.

Testimony For: This is about transparency. The information will allow for a better understanding of what is happening in the marketplace. A bill was proposed last session. In the interim, stakeholders participated in a collaborative process to refine the bill. All parties may not agree with all of the bill. Rate-making is less of a science of actuaries than a negotiation between attorneys. This bill captures important data but does not ask for information that is not available. Everyone has different information that supports contradictory positions. This will help provide better information. Last year's bill was not workable. The sponsor and other interested parties worked on these issues. This bill can be administratively implemented and protects confidential information. There is not enough impartial information on the subject. This bill will help answer questions.

(With concerns) Surplus line brokers are included in the reporting provisions. Surplus line brokers do not have access to all of this information. There are possible fines for noncompliance and surplus line brokers may not be able to comply. The bill provides a disincentive for a broker to sell medical malpractice coverage.

Testimony Against: None.

Persons Testifying: (In support) Kerry Watrin, MD; and Ken Bertrand, Group Health.

(With concerns) Tom Parker, Surplus Lines Association of Washington.

Persons Signed In To Testify But Not Testifying: None.