HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 2073
As Reported by House Committee On:
Juvenile Justice & Family Law
Title: An act relating to juvenile sentencing alternatives.
Brief Description: Revising juvenile sentencing alternatives.
Sponsors: Representatives Dickerson, Moeller and Chase.
Brief History:
Juvenile Justice & Family Law: 2/28/05, 3/2/05 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUVENILE JUSTICE & FAMILY LAW
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Dickerson, Chair; Moeller, Vice Chair; McDonald, Ranking Minority Member; McCune, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Crouse, Lovick and Roberts.
Staff: Sonja Hallum (786-7092).
Background:
A juvenile offender who is adjudicated of an offense may be given a sentence by the court
based on the statutorily available sentencing options. The majority of the sentences imposed
by the juvenile court are standard range sentences. Standard range sentences are calculated
based on a grid system using the offender's prior criminal history and the seriousness of the
current offense.
If the court finds that a standard range sentence is not appropriate in a specific case the court
may impose a statutorily available alternative sentence. In 2003, ESSB 5903 was enacted
and created several new sentencing options, including the Mental Health Disposition
Alternative (Disposition Alternative).
The Disposition Alternative permits a court to impose a suspended sentence based upon the
offender's compliance with mental health treatment. The eligibility requirements for the
sentencing alternative are as follows:
A juvenile offender is ineligible for the Disposition Alternative if he or she is convicted of a
sex or violent offense.
If the court imposes the Disposition Alternative, the court will impose a sentence including
confinement up to 65 weeks. The court will suspend the sentence, place the juvenile on
community supervision for up to one year, require participation in treatment interventions,
and impose one or more local sanctions. Local sanctions might include requirements such as
up to 30 days of confinement in the detention facility, community service, payment of fines,
or probation requirements such as attending school and curfew.
If the juvenile fails to comply with the terms of the Disposition Alternative the court may
impose sanctions, or may revoke the Disposition Alternative and impose the original
sentence.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
The eligibility requirements for the Disposition Alternative are changed. The requirement
that the juvenile offender be subject to a standard range sentence between 15 and 65 weeks is
eliminated. A juvenile may now be eligible for the disposition alternative if he or she
receives a Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration commitment sentence of any length.
The offenses which are ineligible for the sentencing alternative are changed. An offender
who is adjudicated of any of the following offenses is ineligible for the disposition
alternative:
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The substitute clarifies which offenses are ineligible for the Disposition Alternative by
removing the different age qualifications and the list of offenses that were prohibited. The
substitute replaces the list of offenses with a statement that all B+ and B offenses are
excluded if they involved bodily injury or a deadly weapon in the offense.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: This bill is designed to expand the eligibility for the Disposition Alternative. It expands the eligibility by allowing more offenses to be eligible so long as they don't involve a deadly weapon or the infliction of bodily harm. It is cost effective to have research-based programs in the community. It saves the state money. The drop in crime rates indicate that these programs are doing well. We can do more under this bill. In 2004, we only used it for five kids, but we can quadruple this number and it would be a significant savings to the state.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: Representative Dickerson, prime sponsor; and Bruce Knutson, Washington Association of Juvenile Court Administrators.