Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Judiciary Committee | |
HB 2391
Title: An act relating to blood or breath tests of persons involved in fatal motor vehicle accidents.
Brief Description: Authorizing blood or breath tests of persons involved in fatal motor vehicle accidents.
Sponsors: Representatives Campbell, Flannigan, McCune, Williams, Nixon, McDonald, Morrell, Moeller, Rodne, Springer, Tom, Green and Ericks.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
Hearing Date: 1/11/06
Staff: Trudes Tango (786-7384).
Background:
I. Breath or blood alcohol concentration (BAC) testing
Under the implied consent laws, a driver is presumed to have given consent to a blood or breath
alcohol test if the driver is arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs (DUI). If
the driver refuses the BAC test, he or she is subject to sanctions such as administrative loss of his
or her driver's license.
Under certain circumstances, a driver's consent is not required. A BAC test may be administered
without the driver's consent if he or she is unconscious or arrested for vehicular homicide or
vehicular assault or if he or she is arrested for DUI in which there was an accident resulting in
serious bodily injury to another person.
II. Special needs exception to the Fourth Amendment
The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. A search or seizure is
reasonable only if it is done pursuant to a warrant based on probable cause or if it falls into one
of the well-established exceptions to the warrant requirement. The U.S. Supreme Court has
recognized one such exception when "special needs, beyond the normal need for law
enforcement, make the warrant and probable cause requirement impracticable." Skinner v.
Railway Labor Executives' Assoc., 109 S.Ct. 1402 (1989).
The "special need" asserted by the state must serve a purpose other than to collect evidence for
criminal prosecution. When evaluating the constitutionality of a "special needs" search, courts
will balance the interests of the state against the individual's privacy interest.
III. Accident investigations
When an officer investigates a motor vehicle accident in which there has been an injury or
property damage, the officer must submit an accident report to the Washington State Patrol
(WSP). The WSP must collect data and analyze all accident reports. The WSP publishes
statistical information showing the number of accidents, the location, the frequency, whether any
driver was distracted at the time, and other information to help determine the cause of accidents.
The accident reports and WSP analysis are available to various agencies, such as the department
of transportation, the traffic safety commission, and other entities.
Summary of Bill:
The legislature declares that the state has a compelling interest in understanding the causes of and
preventing fatal car accidents. The state's compelling interest creates a special need beyond
normal law enforcement to collect breath or blood alcohol content from drivers involved in fatal
car accidents.
All drivers involved in car accidents in which there is a death or reasonable likelihood of death
must submit to a breath or blood alcohol concentration (BAC) test. The driver's consent is not
required. The officer must order the test regardless of whether the person was driving as part of
his or her official or employment duties or as a private citizen.
Law enforcement must forward the BAC results to the Washington State Patrol (WSP). The
WSP must collect the BAC tests as part of its analysis of accident reports.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 4, 2006.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.