Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Technology, Energy & Communications Committee | |
HB 2400
Brief Description: Creating a sustainable energy trust.
Sponsors: Representatives Morris, Morrell, Hasegawa, Murray, Hudgins, Dickerson, B. Sullivan, Ericks, Sells, O'Brien and Green.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 1/13/06
Staff: Scott Richards (786-7156).
Background:
System Benefit Charge
System Benefit Charges, also known as public benefit funds, public purpose charges, or public
good charges, are state-controlled funds generated by levying a small surcharge on consumer
electricity usage. Typically, state programs have been developed through the electric utility
restructuring process as a measure to ensure continued support for renewable energy resources,
energy efficiency initiatives, and low-income support programs. However, Vermont and
Wisconsin have passed system benefits legislation without restructuring.
According to the Database of State Incentives for Renewable Energy (DSIRE), as of September
2005 there were 15 state funds, making available approximately $4 billion by 2017 to promote
renewable and clean energy.
Funding Mechanisms
State-level funds are most commonly supported through a charge to all customers on electricity
consumption. However, funds can receive money in lump sums either as a result of a settlement
of a utility merger or sale of generation assets.
The most common approach used by states is a system benefits charge consisting of a small
non-by-passable per kWh charge on the electric distribution service. This charge is considered to
be competitively neutral because customers pay the charge no matter who their generation
supplier is. Twelve states have adopted this type of approach. In the alternative, some states have
used approaches where either the funding is embedded in rates or provided through a flat
monthly fee, rather than a per kilowatt-hour charge.
Most states require that all customers pay into the fund. Oregon is a notable exception, allowing
large customers (greater than 1 MW) to take a "credit" against the public benefit charge for
documented self-spending on energy efficiency projects. Plus, Oregon allows for a special
discounted per kWh charge for aluminum smelters.
Fund Administration
About half of the states with system benefit charges rely principally upon the individual utilities
to administer the programs, while the other half feature some type of non-utility administration,
relying on either public or quasi-public agencies or independent non-profit organizations. Over
time, there has been a migration towards independent, non-utility administration of public
benefits programs.
Summary of Bill:
Sustainable Energy Trust
The Sustainable Energy Trust is established to fund distributive generation projects below one
megawatt connected to the distribution transmission of an electric utility. Revenue to the fund
consists of system benefit charge money received as part of this act.
System Benefit Charge
All electric and natural gas companies must collect a system benefit charge monthly from all
retail electricity customers within its service area for ten years. The monthly charge is as follows:
All system benefit charges collected must be deposited in the Sustainable Energy Trust Fund.
The state treasurer will be the custodian of the Sustainable Energy Trust Fund and the Energy
Policy Office of the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED) will
be solely responsible to authorize expenditures from the fund.
Sustainable Energy Grant Program
The CTED is authorized to establish and manage a competitive, sustainable energy projects grant
program. The purpose of the program is to foster the growth, development and
commercialization of distributive generation projects and to stimulate demand for distributive
generation. The CTED must establish program performance benchmarks, review the grant
program periodically and report the results to the legislature annually. The CTED must form a
peer review committee with recognized expertise to assist the department in the development of a
comprehensive plan, expenditures of funds and independent review of grant program proposals.
In administering the grant program, the CTED shall develop criteria for the awarding of grants
and make grant awards. The CTED shall seek to provide a balance between research grant
awards and grants that support the manufacture, commercialization, deployment and installation
of distributive generation technologies.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on 1/04/06.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.