Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
State Government Operations & Accountability Committee | |
HB 2479
Brief Description: Ensuring equipment accessibility for voters with visual impairments.
Sponsors: Representatives Haigh, Nixon, Green, Hunt, Haler, Morrell and Upthegrove; by request of Secretary of State.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
Hearing Date: 1/13/06
Staff: Marsha Reilly (786-7135).
Background:
Washington Voting System Certification Requirements
The Secretary of State (Secretary) is responsible for the inspection, evaluation, and testing of
voting systems in the state (RCW 29A.12.020). Voting systems, voting devices, and vote
tallying systems must be certified and approved by the Secretary before they can be used or sold
in the state.
To be certified in Washington, a voting device must:
Any system certified for use in Washington also must meet the Federal standards (WAC
435.335.010).
National Voting System Standards
The Help America Vote Act (HAVA) required the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC)
to issue Voluntary Voting System Guidelines that would update and augment the 2002 Voting
System Standards (Standards) to reflect advances in voting technology, to incorporate
requirements of the HAVA, and to address the proliferation of electronic voting systems. The
proposed guidelines were released for comment in June 2005, and the final guidelines were
adopted in December 2005. The HAVA also required the EAC to develop a national program for
accrediting voting system testing laboratories and to oversee the certification of voting systems.
This has been done in the past by the National Association of State Election Directors.
The Standards for vote accuracy require that all systems must:
In addition, DRE systems must be able to record and retain redundant copies of the original
ballot image.
Voting equipment vendors must submit hardware, firmware, and software to an Independent Test
Authority (ITA) for evaluation against the Standards.
Data accuracy is defined in terms of ballot position error rate. Each location on a paper ballot
card or electronic ballot image where a vote may be entered represents a ballot position.
This rate applies to the voting functions and supporting equipment that capture, record, store,
consolidate and report the specific selections, and absence of selections, made by the voter for
each ballot position.
For each processing function, the system must achieve a target error rate of no more than one in
10,000,000 ballot positions, with a maximum acceptable error rate in the test process of one in
500,000 ballot positions. This error rate includes errors from any source while testing a specific
processing function and its related equipment.
If the system makes one error before counting 26,997 consecutive ballot positions correctly, it
will be rejected. The vendor is then required to improve the system.
If the system reads at least 1,549,703 consecutive ballot positions correctly, it will be accepted.
If the system correctly reads more than 26,997 ballot positions but less than 1,549,703 when the
first error occurs, the testing will have to be continued until another 1,576,701 consecutive ballot
positions are counted without error (a total of 3,126,404 with one error).
Disability Access Voting
The HAVE requires that disability access voting must be offered using disability access voting
devices that meet access requirements. Specifically, the HAVA requires that a voting system "be
accessible for individuals with disabilities, including nonvisual accessibility for the blind and
visually impaired, in a manner that provides the same opportunity for access and participation
(including privacy and independence) as for other voters.
County auditors are responsible for the designation of disability access voting locations in the
county. At the discretion of the county auditor, the period for disability access voting may begin
20 days before an election and end one day before the election; however, he or she may set the
end of the disability access voting period to satisfy requirements for printing and distributing poll
books to the polls in order to prevent multiple voting. The auditor is required to maintain a
system to prevent multiple voting.
Summary of Bill:
The requirement that a voting device be used in another state before it may be certified in
Washington is removed. Instead, it is required that the device be tested and certified by an ITA
designated by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. The requirement that voting equipment
allow the voter to vote for candidates of multiple political parties also is removed.
Dates for disability access voting are changed from permissive to mandatory. The ending date
for disability access voting is changed from one day before the election to the day of the election.
County auditors are required to provide voting access to individuals who are blind or visually
impaired at disability access voting locations.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 9, 2006.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.