HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 2706
As Reported by House Committee On:
Education
Title: An act relating to requiring a more rigorous curriculum for high school graduation.
Brief Description: Regarding a more rigorous curriculum for high school graduation.
Sponsors: Representatives Hunter, Sommers, Tom, Anderson, Talcott, Quall, McIntire, Dunn, Green, Kenney and Lantz.
Brief History:
Education: 1/26/06, 2/2/06 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 12 members: Representatives Quall, Chair; P. Sullivan, Vice Chair; Talcott, Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Curtis, Haigh, Hunter, McDermott, Priest, Shabro, Tom, and Wallace.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 1 member: Representative Santos.
Staff: Barbara McLain (786-7383).
Background:
The State Board of Education (SBE) is charged with adopting statewide high school
graduation requirements. The current SBE rules require a student to accumulate 19 credits in
the following course content areas:
Local school districts can adopt additional courses or other requirements.
A number of national organizations, including the American Diploma Project (ADP) and the
National Governor's Association, have recommended that states encourage higher standards
for high school graduation. The ADP recommends that all students be required to take a
college and workplace readiness curriculum that is defined by specific, challenging core
content.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
Beginning with the class of students entering ninth grade in 2008-09, state graduation
requirements adopted by the SBE must include three years of mathematics including at least
Algebra I and Geometry.
Beginning with the class of students entering ninth grade in 2010-11, state graduation
requirements must include four years of mathematics including at least Algebra II, Geometry,
and a higher-level mathematics course designed to prepare students for postsecondary study
without remediation.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The original bill created a recommended high school program including three credits each of
English and mathematics, three credits each of science and social studies, and four credits in
an academic or career and technical concentration. All students would be required to enroll
in the recommended program unless exempted with written parental permission. The
substitute bill phases in an increase in mathematics credits and content required for
graduation, beginning with three credits for the freshman class of 2008-09, and four credits
for the freshman class of 2010-11.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: (In support) We must think about how to prepare children for their future
and our future. To earn an income that increases rather than decreases over time, students
must have educational experience after high school. We cannot wander along with the same
graduation requirements as 100 years ago. There are 22 other states increasing their
graduation requirements. This is very timely in terms of the global marketplace. We have a
two-tiered graduation system now; no one tells high school students that it is in their best
interest to pursue college preparatory coursework from the beginning. Unless students have
parents who push them in this direction, they are left behind. The level of math and science
needed is at the college preparatory level. We need to "send the memo" to the K-12 system
that the world has changed.
(With concerns) High expectations and rigor should be supported. It is wonderful to propose
alignment between college and work expectations and high school graduation, but how will
the eduational system be able to support this proposal? Is there capacity? Are the teachers
ready and do they exist? This has the potential to create a two-tiered diploma and
educational system.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Hunter, prime sponsor; Marc Frazer,
Washington State Roundtable; Michele Anciant Aoki, Washington State Coalition for
International Education; and Lisa MacFarlane, League of Education Voters.
(With concerns) Scott Allen, Washington State Parent Teacher Association.