Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Commerce & Labor Committee | |
HB 2734
Brief Description: Providing for disqualification from unemployment compensation due to intoxication.
Sponsors: Representatives Clements, Chandler and Condotta.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 1/26/06
Staff: Elisabeth Frost (786-5793) and Jill Reinmuth (786-7134).
Background:
To receive unemployment compensation, an individual must separate from employment through
no fault of his or her own or quit work for good cause. A person who is discharged or suspended
for misconduct connected with his or her work is disqualified from unemployment compensation
for ten weeks and until he or she earns wages equal to ten times his or her weekly benefit
amount.
Washington Unemployment Compensation Statutes on Misconduct: From 1993 to 2004, the
unemployment compensation law defined "misconduct" as: "an employee's act or failure to act in
willful disregard of his or her employer's interest where the effect of the employee's act or failure
to act is to harm the employer's business." Beginning with claims that have an effective date on
or after January 4, 2004, the unemployment compensation law identifies eleven non-exclusive
examples of misconduct, including deliberate violations or disregard of standards of behavior
which the employer has the right to expect of an employee. None of the listed examples of
misconduct directly mention drug or alcohol use. Under both laws an employee is barred from
raising alcoholism as a defense to disqualification from benefits due to misconduct.
Case Law: No published decisions of either the Washington Court of Appeals or the Washington
Supreme Court address disqualification due to misconduct related to drug or alcohol use since
the implementation of the 2003 misconduct statute, which applies to claims with an effective
date on or after January 4, 2004.
In 2000, in an unpublished opinion, the Washington Court of Appeals found that a grocery store
deli clerk who was discharged because she reported to work under the influence of alcohol in
violation of her employer's work rules was justifiably denied benefits for misconduct.
Summary of Bill:
For claims with an effective date on or after the bill's effective date, the following conduct is
listed as constituting "misconduct" for unemployment compensation purposes:
Listing this conduct as "misconduct" does not limit the application of the misconduct law to
other kinds of behavior involving intoxicating liquor or controlled substances.
"Controlled substance" is defined as in the Controlled Substances Act, meaning a drug,
substance, or precursor included in Schedules I through V as set forth in federal or state laws, or
federal or board rules.
"Under the influence" is defined as the standard established by the employer in a written policy in
effect when the conduct occurred and of which the employee received actual notice. In the event
that no such policy was established, the standard for "under the influence" shall be the same as
the law requires for a person to be guilty of driving under the influence.
A "motor vehicle" means every vehicle that is self-propelled, propelled by electric power
obtained from overhead trolley wires, and vehicles classified as "neighborhood electric vehicles."
It does not include vehicles operated upon rails, electric personal assistive mobility devices, or
power wheelchairs.
Technical changes are made to make references to "employee" consistent throughout these
provisions.
Rules Authority: The Commissioner of the Employment Security Department is granted rule
making authority as necessary to implement the bill.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.