HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 2776
As Reported by House Committee On:
Financial Institutions & Insurance
Title: An act relating to home heating fuel service contracts.
Brief Description: Regulating home heating fuel service contracts.
Sponsors: Representatives Dickerson, Kirby, Roach and McDonald.
Brief History:
Financial Institutions & Insurance: 1/24/06, 1/26/06 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS & INSURANCE
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 11 members: Representatives Kirby, Chair; Ericks, Vice Chair; Roach, Ranking Minority Member; Tom, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Newhouse, O'Brien, Santos, Serben, Simpson, Strow and Williams.
Staff: Jon Hedegard (786-7127).
Background:
Insurance and insurance transactions are governed by Title 48 RCW of the Insurance Code.
Among other things, this title requires: (1) that insurers meet certain financial requirements;
and (2) that agents, solicitors, and brokers of insurance comply with specified licensing
standards. Financial and criminal penalties may result from noncompliance.
Certain transactions that fall within the definition of insurance have been addressed by
exemption from Title 48 RCW or the creation of a specific regulatory structure. Entities
regulated under these chapters may not be required to comply with the same capitalization
and reserve requirements, reporting and solvency oversight, and claims handling practices as
are required of an insurer selling a traditional insurance product.
In 1999, Chapter 48.110 RCW was created for the regulation of service contracts. A service
contract provider may choose one of the following options to ensure that all obligations and
liabilities are paid:
Summary of Substitute Bill:
The bill creates a new chapter in Title 48 RCW dedicated to the regulation of home heating
fuel service contracts. Home heating fuel service contracts are otherwise exempt from
Chapter 48.110 RCW and Title 48 RCW.
Definitions are provided for the new chapter.
The chapter includes requirements that are approximately parallel to Chapter 48.110 RCW
for:
The financial guaranty provisions applied to home heating fuel service contracts are slightly
altered from the service contract structure. The provision allowing the option of insuring all
contracts under a reimbursement policy remains intact. The option of allowing the
maintenance of a net worth or stockholder's equity of $100 million is removed. The option of
maintaining a reserve account and giving the Insurance Commissioner a financial security
deposit is modified. The percentage of gross consideration remains the same but the
minimum amount of the financial security deposit is reduced from $25,000 to $10,000.
Additional differences from the provisions of Chapter 48.110 RCW include:
The act applies to home heating fuel service contracts sold or offered for sale after October 1,
2006.
The Insurance Commissioner may adopt rules to implement and administer the new chapter.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The definition of "home heating fuel service contract" is limited to contracts to repair, replace
or maintain customer owned fuel systems. The definition of "home heating fuel service
contract provider" is changed to include the requirement that the provider is not just
contractually obligated to the customer but also provides home heating fuel delivery services
to the customer. A pledged certificate of deposit is added to the list of types of acceptable
security deposits.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: The Legislature passed the Service Contract Act in 1999. No one
considered home heating fuel contracts as part of the subject of the bill. The home heating
oil industry only found out last year that the Insurance Commissioner considers the law to
apply to them. The home heating fuel service contract providers have difficulty in
complying with the current law. The bill is a common sense solution to the problem. It
allows the business to continue serving their customers. Without the bill, there may be
negative impacts on the businesses and consumers. I've been in the business for 40 years and
sold these contracts the entire time. No insurer in the state would be willing to pick up this
business because the amount of money is so low. These contracts have been a part of the
industry for decades. It provides a service to customers. There are no disputes or lawsuits
regarding this service. It is an optional product. A customer can sign up or not. They can
end the service if they choose to do so. If they have the product, we replace their tank if it
has a problem. The product does not cover pollution. It works well with the Pollution
Liability Insurance Agency (PLIA). We cover tank replacement; the PLIA covers pollution.
These are small, family-owned businesses. These businesses support this bill and the PLIA
bill (HB 2678). The two programs work well together. The Insurance Commissioner found
out about these contracts and informed the companies that they had to come into compliance
with the law. Many cannot comply with the existing law. This bill is based on the service
contracts chapter. It differs in some financial provisions. The bill includes standards that can
be met and allows dealers to continue to offer a cost-effective product that provides security
for consumers.
(With concerns) The definition of home heating fuel includes propane dealers. The bill is
addressed to situations where the homeowner owns the tank. We have no issue with how the
bill addresses those situations. Propane dealers own the tanks. If there is an issue with the
tank, the dealer replaces the tank. There is no need for an insurance product. The concerns
propane dealers have with the bill can be fixed with a two word amendment. If "customer
owned" is added to the definition of home heating fuel service contract, we would be fine
with the bill.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: Warren Aakernk, Balland Oil Company; John Croteau, Rossoe Energy;
and Tom Allen, Acme Fuel Company and Northwest Oil Heat Council.
(With concerns) Mel Sorensen, Northwest Propane Gas Association.