FINAL BILL REPORT
SHB 2817
C 180 L 06
Synopsis as Enacted
Brief Description: Establishing a technology emphasis for institutions of higher education.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Higher Education & Workforce Education (originally sponsored by Representatives Sells, McCoy, Strow, Dunshee, Lovick, Jarrett, Morris, Ormsby, Morrell, Haler, O'Brien, Fromhold, Ericks, Kilmer and B. Sullivan).
House Committee on Higher Education & Workforce Education
Senate Committee on Early Learning, K-12 & Higher Education
Background:
State Trends in Undergraduate Enrollment and Degree Production
The Office of Financial Management (OFM) collects data on undergraduate enrollments and
degrees produced in specific fields. The OFM data show that of the 90,074 full-time
equivalents (FTEs) who were enrolled at the undergraduate level in 2002-2003 at public four-year institutions:
A total of 20,456 bachelor degrees were awarded in all fields, and the data show that:
Relationship Between Specific Fields of Study and Employer Demand
A recent joint study conducted by the Higher Education Coordinating Board (HECB), the
Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board, and the State Board for Community
and Technical Colleges states that demand for workers trained at the baccalaureate level and
higher in certain occupations is not met by current supply. Current degree production meets
only 67 percent of the need in engineering and 56 percent of the need in computer science.
The study finds that demand would best be met through increased enrollment in related
programs.
Summary:
The Legislature recognizes that placing a priority on enrolling students and conferring
degrees in the fields of engineering, technology, biotechnology, science, computer science,
and mathematics is vital to the state's economic prosperity. Therefore, it is the Legislature's
intent to promote increased access, delivery models, enrollment slots, and degree
opportunities in these fields.
Institutions of higher education are required to determine local student demand in these fields
and submit findings and proposed alternatives to meet demand to the HECB and the
Legislature by November 1, 2008. The HECB must track and report progress in at least the
following ways:
biennial basis;
The institutions of higher education have discretion and flexibility in achieving the objectives
of increasing enrollments and degrees conferred in these fields. Types of institutional
programs include, but are not limited to, establishment of institutes of technology, new
polytechnic-based institutions, and new divisions of existing institutions. Examples of
delivery models include face-to-face learning, interactive courses, internet-based offerings,
and instruction on main campuses, branch campuses, and other educational centers.
Votes on Final Passage:
House 98 0
Senate 48 0 (Senate amended)
House 95 0 (House concurred)
Effective: June 7, 2006