Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Education Committee | |
HB 2998
Brief Description: Revising the high school assessment system.
Sponsors: Representatives P. Sullivan, Simpson, Santos, McCoy, Chase, Morrell, B. Sullivan, Hasegawa, Kenney and Green.
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 1/23/06
Staff: Barbara McLain (786-7383).
Background:
Beginning with the graduating class of 2008, most students will be required to obtain a
Certificate of Academic Achievement (CAA) in order to graduate from a public high school in
the state. Students must meet the state standards in reading, writing, and mathematics on the
high school Washington Assessment of Student Learning (WASL) to earn a CAA. Science will
be added in 2010.
Starting in 2006, students will have four opportunities to retake the WASL in the content areas
where they did not meet the state standard. A student who achieves the standard but wishes to
improve his or her score must pay for the retake.
In 2004, the Legislature also authorized the Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) to develop
one or more objective alternative assessments for high school students to demonstrate they meet
the state academic standards instead of relying on the WASL for this purpose. To use an
alternative, a student must take the WASL at least twice. The Legislature must formally approve
implementation of any alternative assessment.
Beginning with the class of 2006, a student's transcript must display the highest WASL score and
proficiency level for each content area. Beginning with the class of 2008, if a student achieves
the highest proficiency level on the first try, the transcript includes a scholar's designation.
Summary of Bill:
Beginning in the 2007-08 school year, the high school assessment system must provide certified
assessment options for the purpose of demonstrating a student has met state learning standards.
Certification Process
Before the beginning of the 2007-08 school year, the State Board of Education (SBE) must
establish a procedure for certifying assessment options that lead to a CAA. Certification is based
on demonstrated alignment with the state learning standards, including school-to-work goals.
The level of student performance necessary to meet the standards shall be comparable across all
assessments. The options will include portfolios, industry certification tests, other assessments
used to determine readiness for workforce entry or higher education, and college entrance exams.
The SBE establishes an advisory committee to develop the certification process, including
educators, parents, and representatives of cultural, linguistic, and racial minority groups, and the
community of persons with disabilities. In developing the process, the SBE shall also:
1. Review national tests to determine whether students who perform at specified levels have
demonstrated they meet state learning standards;
2. Evaluate research on existing assessment systems in other states, including states that have
added multiple measures to state-developed tests and have moved to other assessment
methods. The analysis includes the effects of the assessments on improvement of student
performance; disaggregation of results for subgroups of the student population; cost; and the
ability of the assessments to provide diagnostic information. The analysis will done with
assistance from a nationally recognized center at a public or nonprofit university that has
conducted similar research;
3. Identify and adopt or develop culturally relevant assessments for students from demographic
groups that have had difficulty with the WASL and are over-represented as not meeting the
state standard on the WASL;
4. Review electronic portfolios to determine whether this method of collecting and presenting
student work can be adapted for use as a certified assessment option; and
5. Review internship, service learning, and apprenticeship models to determine whether they
can be used as an assessment option.
The requirement that SPI develop objective alternative assessments for legislative approval is
eliminated. Instead, the Legislature formally approves the process established by the SBE for
certifying and adopting assessment options.
Implementation
If the Legislature has approved the certification process, students in the graduating classes of
2008 and 2009 have the opportunity to use a certified assessment option instead of retaking the
WASL to demonstrate they meet the state's standards to earn a CAA. The requirement that a
student take the WASL twice before using an alternative is eliminated.
Beginning in the 2007-08 school year, students must have the option to select a certified
assessment option instead of the WASL to demonstrate they meet the state standards and earn a
CAA. School districts must make the certified assessment options available to all high school
students in the district.
The CAA becomes a graduation requirement when the Legislature has approved the certification
process; the SBE has certified at least three assessment options; and students have been given at
least one academic year to complete one of the assessment options.
The requirement that student transcripts display the highest WASL scores or a scholar's
designation is repealed. The requirement that students must pay to retake the WASL to improve
their scores is also repealed.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.