HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 3046
As Reported by House Committee On:
Economic Development, Agriculture & Trade
Title: An act relating to establishing the Washington beer commission.
Brief Description: Establishing the Washington beer commission.
Sponsors: Representatives P. Sullivan, Newhouse, Grant, Kristiansen, Quall, Armstrong, Blake, Haler, Wallace, Skinner, Clibborn, Chandler, Condotta, Kessler, Morrell, Simpson, Conway, Kirby, Sells, Rodne, Kilmer and Linville.
Brief History:
Economic Development, Agriculture & Trade: 1/31/06 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AGRICULTURE & TRADE
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 22 members: Representatives Linville, Chair; Pettigrew, Vice Chair; Kristiansen, Ranking Minority Member; Appleton, Bailey, Blake, Buri, Chase, Clibborn, Dunn, Grant, Haler, Holmquist, Kilmer, Kretz, McCoy, Morrell, Newhouse, Quall, Strow, P. Sullivan and Wallace.
Staff: Meg Van Schoorl (786-7105).
Background:
Agricultural commodity commissions and boards may be established in Washington law
either under individual chapters or as part of enabling acts covering multiple commodities.
Commodity commissions perform a variety of functions, including advertising, sales
promotion, research, and education, related to a particular commodity.
Currently, 24 commodity commissions are established under Washington law. Six were
created under their own individual chapters: apple; dairy products; fruit; beef; tree fruit
research; and wine. Six were created under the 1955 Commodity Commission Enabling Act
and have their own chapters under the Washington Administrative Code (WAC): potato;
seed potato; bulb; wheat; fryer; and barley. The remaining 12 were created under the 1961
Commodity Commission Enabling Act and have their own chapters under the WAC: hop;
dry pea and lentil; mint; blueberry; alfalfa seed; red raspberry; cranberry; strawberry;
asparagus; Puget Sound salmon; canola and rapeseed; and turfgrass seed.
Depending upon industry priorities, some commissions perform primarily marketing
programs; some perform only research programs; some commissions perform both. The
majority of the commissions' funding derives from mandatory producer assessments. Their
annual budgets range from $12,000 to $6.1 million.
In recent years, there have been numerous court challenges nationwide objecting to
commodity commissions' use of mandatory assessments for advertising and market
promotion programs. The lawsuits have centered on allegations that such programs infringe
upon First Amendment rights to free speech by mandating that producers pay assessments to
fund generic advertising with which they may disagree.
In 2003, a court challenge brought against the Washington Apple Commission resulted in
legislation to restructure commodity commission statutes in terms of governance, speech, and
oversight of commission activities, budget and programs.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
Public Interest
The production and proper promotion of Washington beer is in the public interest and is vital
to the state's economic well-being because it provides jobs, tax revenues and other benefits to
the state and local communities. This chapter is only one part of a comprehensive scheme to
regulate production and marketing of Washington beer. This chapter is enacted in the
exercise of the police powers of the state to protect the health, peace, safety and general
welfare of its citizens.
Speaking on Behalf of the Washington State Government
The Legislature charges the Washington Beer Commission (Commission), with oversight by
the Director of the Department of Agriculture (Department), to speak on behalf of the
Washington government with regard to the marketing and promotion of
Washington-produced beer.
Establishing the Beer Commission
Creation of the Commission requires that a referendum be conducted by the Department and
approved by a specified number of affected producers. A "producer" is any person or other
entity licensed under Title 66 RCW to produce beer within the state and who produces less
than 100,000 barrels of beer annually per location. An "affected producer" is any producer
subject to this chapter. The referendum procedure is initiated when the Director of the
Department is petitioned to implement the chapter and determine producer participation and
the assessment. Procedural requirements for the petition and for the referendum are specified
in section 5 of the bill. If the Director determines that the referendum has been approved, he
or she will appoint Commission members within 60 days and will direct the Commission to
initiate the producers' assessment. If the Director determines that the referendum has not
been approved, he or she will take no further action to implement or enforce the chapter.
Commission Members
The Commission will have seven voting members, including six producers and the Director
of the Department. The Director will appoint the producer members of the Commission,
taking into consideration recommendations made by a statewide craft brewing association or
other affected producers. The Director will seek balanced representation on the Commission
on the basis of beer produced and geographic location. Qualifications for Commission
membership, procedures relating to transacting Commission business, terms, appointments,
and reimbursement of expenses are described in sections 4 and 6 of the bill.
Commissioner Responsibilities
The Commission shall:
The Commission must submit to the Director for approval any plans, programs, and projects
concerning advertising, promotion and education, market research and development. The
Director must review the advertising or promotion program to ensure that no false claims are
made. The Commission must also submit for the Director's approval its proposed research
plan, its commodity-related education and training plan, and budget.
Research, Promotional, Educational Program
The Commission may create and conduct a comprehensive and extensive research,
promotional and education campaign. The campaign must take into account the needs of
producers, market conditions, and public awareness. Research goals may include efforts to:
Donations and Promotional Hosting
The Commission may purchase or receive donations of beer or malt beverages from any
brewery worldwide and use them for promotional purposes. Beer and malt beverages
furnished and used in-state are subject to beer and wine taxes. No liquor license, permit or
bond is required of the Commission for authorized promotional activities. Commission
expenditures for agricultural development, trade promotion and promotional hosting must be
approved by the Commission as specific line items at its annual public budget hearings.
Obligations of the Commission
Obligations incurred by the Commission and other liabilities or claims against the
Commission will be enforced only against the assets of the Commission. No liability for the
debts or actions of the Commission will exist against the state, its subdivisions and
instrumentalities, or individual members, employees or agents of the Commission or the
state.
Assessments
An annual assessment of 10 cents per barrel of beer produced, up to 10,000 barrels per
location, is levied upon beer produced by an affected producer. The assessment is a personal
debt of each producer assessed. The consequences for lack of payment are described in
section 16 of the bill. The Commission must adopt rules for payment and collection of the
assessment. The assessment of an individual affected producer may be reduced based upon
in-kind contributions to the Commission. Moneys collected will be deposited into a separate
account in a state depositary. Expenditures from the account may be made without specific
legislative appropriation.
Disclosure
Certain agricultural business records, Commission records, and Department records relating
to the Commission and producers are exempt from public disclosure. These are further
identified in sections 25 and 26 of the bill. Some records may be shared between the
Department and the Commission, or used in a suit or administrative hearing involving this
chapter.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The emergency clause is removed.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 24, 2006.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed, except section 26 which reinstates prior law related to public disclosure exemptions for agriculture and livestock after a scheduled expiration and takes effect July 1, 2006.
Testimony For: Beer production is a growing industry in Washington, and an agricultural economic development tool that can bring jobs and revenues to rural areas. At one time, there were only a few large breweries on the west side. Now there are 82 craft brew pubs covering many regions of the state. Beer production uses in-state commodities including hops, wheat, and premium barley, which brings higher prices to growers. Breweries, festivals and tastings are tourist attractions. The Washington Wine Commission model is being used for the Beer Commission. When the Wine Commission began, there were only 22 wineries in the area. Now there are over 400. The Beer Commission assessment on producers will be small, so the majority of its funding will be raised through "sweat equity" from specialized tastings, festivals and fundraisers. Ten years ago, similar legislation was proposed, but at that time, the industry was fragmented about forming a commission. All 82 microbreweries are in favor of the Commission now, and since it is self-sustaining, there should be no fiscal impact on the state.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: T.K. Bentler, Arlen Harris, Janelle Pritchard, and Dick Cantwell, Washington Brewers Guild.