HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 3165
As Reported by House Committee On:
Housing
Capital Budget
Title: An act relating to using surplus property to develop affordable housing.
Brief Description: Using surplus property to develop affordable housing.
Sponsors: Representatives Miloscia, Chase and Hasegawa.
Brief History:
Housing: 1/31/06 [DPS];
Capital Budget: 2/6/06, 2/7/06 [DP2S(w/o sub HOUS)].
Brief Summary of Second Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HOUSING
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 5 members: Representatives Miloscia, Chair; Springer, Vice Chair; Ormsby, Pettigrew and Sells.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 4 members: Representatives Holmquist, Ranking Minority Member; Dunn, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; McCune and Schindler.
Staff: Robyn Dupuis (786-7166).
Background:
Under current statute, local governments, the Department of Social and Health Services
(DSHS), the Department of Transportation (DOT), the Department of Corrections (DOC),
and the General Administration (GA) are required to identify and catalog real property that is
suitable for the development of affordable housing for very low-income, low-income, and
moderate-income households. The local governments and state agencies must provide a copy
of this inventory, updated annually to the Department of Community, Trade and Economic
Development (DCTED).
DOT
The DOT has a statutory policy which states that priority for surplus land disbursement is to
be given to abutting property owners. The DOT, however, may also sell the property to a
number of governmental entities or persons including nonprofit organizations dedicated to
providing affordable housing.
Parks and Recreation Commission
When deeding land to a local government or other entity for outdoor recreation, the Parks and
Recreation Commission (Commission) includes a clause requiring that the land be remitted
to the Commission if not to be used for that purpose. If the Commission has no use of the
land, however, the holder of the land must reimburse the Commission for the release of the
reversionary interest in the land in the amount of the fair market value. Funds from this
reimbursement are deposited into the Parkland Acquisition Account for the purchase of
property to be used as state park property.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
The DCTED, the DNR, the DSHS, the DOC, the DOT, the GA, the Commission, as well as
all cities, towns and counties are required to inventory all surplus property which is suitable
for affordable housing and provide this list, with monthly updates, to the DCTED (beginning
June 2006). The DCTED will advertise these properties on its website.
All surplus properties suitable for affordable housing, except for properties owned by the
DOT, will be available exclusively to non-profit housing organizations for the first 90 days.
Non-profits may purchase the property at 90 percent of appraised value with a written
commitment that they will develop affordable housing (serving 80 percent or below the area
median income) that will be maintained as affordable housing for a minimum of 30 years. If
the non-profit does not comply with this commitment it must remit the remaining 10 percent
of the appraised value plus interest to the local government or state agency from which it
purchased the property. Interest will be based on the prevailing interest rate for superior
court civil judgments.
All local governments, the DNR, the DSHS, the DOC, the DOT, the GA, and the
Commission must submit an annual report to the DCTED and the DCTED will produce an
annual report to the Legislature that includes information on all properties purchased for
affordable housing and details on the housing produced (or to be produced).
The Parks and Recreation Commission
The Commission shall comply with the surplus property for affordable housing program in
cases in which surplus land is not being used, or will not be used for outdoor recreation
purposes, and when lands are not subject to restrictive conveyances, and are not school or
other grant lands.
Land acquired by the federal government as state forest lands is exempt.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The substitute bill adds additional state agencies subject to the surplus property sale
restrictions for affordable housing including the DNR, the GA, and the Commission. The
substitute specifies that both non-profit housing organizations and housing authorities are
eligible to purchase surplus properties, however, purchase offers must include a commitment
to develop affordable housing serving households making at, or below, 80 percent of the area
median income and to maintain that housing as affordable for a minimum of 30 years. If the
non-profit housing organization or housing authority does not comply with its commitment, it
must remit the remaining 10 percent of the assessed property value plus interest to the selling
party. The bill includes statutes requiring the DOT to submit monthly and annual
information to the DCTED but not requiring the DOT to comply with the sales restrictions
for surplus property. Statutes regarding the Commission specify that the Commission will
comply with the sales restrictions in cases in which the land is not to be used for outdoor
recreation purposes and there are no other restrictive conveyances on the land.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 26, 2006 for the substitute bill.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: This bill will help everyone understand what surplus property is available around the state. For non-profits and housing authorities, having the opportunity to purchase such property at 90 percent of appraised value is a boon. The commitment requirements of providing housing to households making 80 percent or below the area median income and maintaining that affordability level for 30 years is reasonable. Anything that enhances the supply of housing is good for everyone. Washington ranks 43 in the nation in terms of homeownership and anything to increase the affordability and accessibility of housing is a good thing.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Kim Herman, Washington State Housing Finance Commission; and Bob Mitchell, Washington State Realtors.
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON CAPITAL BUDGET
Majority Report: The second substitute bill be substituted therefor and the second substitute bill do pass and do not pass the substitute bill by Committee on Housing. Signed by 16 members: Representatives Dunshee, Chair; Ormsby, Vice Chair; Blake, Chase, Eickmeyer, Ericks, Flannigan, Green, Hasegawa, Lantz, Moeller, Morrell, O'Brien, Schual-Berke, Springer and Upthegrove.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 12 members: Representatives Jarrett, Ranking Minority Member; Hankins, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Clements, Cox, Ericksen, Kretz, Kristiansen, McCune, Newhouse, Roach, Serben and Strow.
Staff: Nona Snell (786-7153).
Summary of Recommendation of Committee On Capital Budget Compared to
Recommendation of Committee On Housing:
Nonprofit housing providers and housing authorities may purchase surplus property at fair
market value. Subject to the offer including information about the affordable housing to be
developed.
The Department of Transportation is required to inventory surplus property and report
annually regarding properties purchased by nonprofit housing providers and housing
authorities.
The requirement that annual housing costs may not exceed 30 percent of gross annual income
is eliminated, and DCTED is directed to establish policies that specify the percentage of
household income that may be spent on housing costs.
State forest lands, federally granted school lands and other trust lands, and lands acquired
under restrictive conveyances are exempt from the requirements included in the bill.
The DCTED is required to include federal surplus property in the surplus lands inventory on
its website.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on February 6, 2006.
Effective Date of Second Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: Washington has the fifth highest cost of single family housing in the nation.
In December 2005, the median price of homes was $269,000, which is 17 percent higher then
the previous year. Home prices in Washington have increased by 81 percent over the past 11
years. Thirty-five percent of the state's households are renters.
A study by the National Low-Income Housing Coalition found that, based on the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development's fair market rent standard, a single person
earning minimum wage could not afford a one-room apartment anywhere in the state.
Washington has one of the most rapidly aging populations in the nation.
Finding land to develop affordable housing on is difficult.
Testimony Against: None.
Persons Testifying: Kim Herman, Washington State Housing Finance Commission.