Brief Description: Prohibiting offenders who enter Alford pleas from receiving a special sex offender sentencing alternative.

Sponsors: By Representatives O'Brien, Rodne, Santos, Strow, Green, Simpson, McDonald, Morrell, Ericks, Kilmer, Williams and Hasegawa.

House Committee on Criminal Justice & Corrections
Senate Committee on Judiciary

Background:

I. The Special Sex Offender Sentencing Alternative

In 1984, the Legislature created the Special Sex Offender Sentencing Alternative (SSOSA). A SSOSA sentence consists of a suspended standard range sentence, incarceration for up to 12 months, treatment for up to five years, and a term of community custody. An offender is eligible for a SSOSA sentence if: (1) he or she is convicted of a sex offense that is not a serious violent offense or rape in the second degree; (2) he or she has no prior felony sex offenses; (3) he or she has no prior adult violent offenses within five years of the current offense; (4) the current offense did not cause substantial bodily harm to the victim; (5) he or she has an established relationship or connection to the victim; and (6) his or her standard sentence range includes the possibility of incarceration for less than 11 years.

II. Alford Pleas

In North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970), the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution allows an offender to enter a plea of guilty without admitting guilt for the underlying crime. This type of plea has been come to be known as an "Alford plea."

Summary:

In order to be eligible for a SSOSA, an offender who receives the alternative pursuant to a guilty plea must admit he or she committed the underlying offense. A SSOSA is not available to an offender who enters an Alford plea.

Votes on Final Passage:

House   97   0
Senate   41   0

Effective: June 7, 2006