Washington State
House of Representatives
Office of Program Research
BILL
ANALYSIS

Local Government Committee

SB 5268

Brief Description: Allowing assumptions of water-sewer districts by code cities.

Sponsors: Senators Esser and Kastama.

Brief Summary of Bill
  • Permits the assumption of a water-sewer district with fewer than 250 customers by a code city with more than 100,000 persons, even though no part of the district is within the corporate boundaries of the city.

Hearing Date: 3/17/05

Staff: CeCe Clynch (786-7168).

Background:

Current law sets forth legislative and electoral mechanisms, based upon geographic location and property valuation, for the assumption of jurisdiction of water-sewer districts (districts) by cities or towns:

Summary of Bill:

A water-sewer district with a population less than 250 on the effective date of this bill may provide, through its board of commissioners, for assumption of the water-sewer district by a code city with a population more than 100,000 on the effective date of this bill. The city council must also so provide and the assumption must be accomplished pursuant to contractual terms and conditions set forth in RCW 35.13A.070. No part of the territory of the district need be within the boundaries of the city. Both the contract and the assumption must be approved by resolution of the district board and by ordinance adopted by the city council.

If the water-sewer district has no indebtedness or monetary obligations on the date of the assumption, the city may only use any surplus funds of the district for water services delivered to the district or water facilities built within the district, unless the contract between the district and the city specifically provides otherwise.

Either the water-sewer district, or the city, or both, may provide for dissolution of the district pursuant to RCW 35.13A.080. That statute provides that dissolution proceedings may be initiated by either the city, or the district, or both. In the case of an agreed upon dissolution with an agreed upon distribution of assets and liabilities, a court hearing is not required and the court may enter an order of dissolution according to the terms agreed to by the district and the city. If the dissolution is commenced by only the city or the district, or if the two do not agree with respect to distribution of the assets and liabilities, provision is made for notice and a hearing before the superior court. The court may enter an order of dissolution and decide upon the distribution of assets and liabilities or the court may decline to dissolve the district, in which case the court must state its reasons.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Not requested.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.