Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Economic Development, Agriculture & Trade Committee | |
SSB 5602
Brief Description: Managing livestock nutrients.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Agriculture & Rural Economic Development (originally sponsored by Senators Rasmussen and Schoesler; by request of Department of Agriculture).
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
|
|
Hearing Date: 3/30/05
Staff: Meg Van Schoorl (786-7105).
Background:
In 1998, the Legislature enacted the Dairy Nutrient Management Act requiring dairies to develop
by July 1, 2002, farm plans to protect water quality. The Department of Ecology (DOE) was
given responsibility to regularly inspect dairies, and to develop and issue a Dairy General
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The Conservation
Commission through conservation districts was charged with providing technical assistance and
cost share to dairy farms to develop and implement their nutrient management plans by
December 31, 2003.
In February 2003, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) adopted a final rule
regulating animal feeding operations (AFOs) and concentrated animal feeding operations
(CAFOs) for the purpose of controlling water pollution. The rules expanded the type and
number of CAFOs required to obtain NPDES permits by December 2006.
In 2003, the Legislature transferred to the Department of Agriculture (WSDA) the Dairy Nutrient
Management Program that had been administered since 1998 by the DOE. The Legislature
intended that there be a fully functioning state program for concentrated animal feeding
operations by 2006 and a single program that would apply to all livestock sectors. Broadened
beyond dairies, the Livestock Nutrient Management Program (LNMP) was to provide regulatory
oversight and guidance to all livestock farms regarding their state and federal responsibilities to
protect water quality while maintaining a healthy business climate for the farms. The program
was expected to develop resources for financial and technical assistance, conduct periodic
inspections and take enforcement action to ensure compliance with state and federal water
quality laws.
The LNMP Development and Oversight Committee (DOC) was created to help the WSDA
evaluate the new federal rules and develop a program that would meet EPA's requirements and
time frames. Chaired by the WSDA, the DOC included representatives from the DOE, the EPA,
a tribal government, an environmental interest organization, a commercial shellfish grower, an
egg laying facility, a conservation district association, three dairy producers, two beef cattle
producers, a poultry producer, a commercial cattle feed lot, and Washington State University.
Since 2003, the WSDA, the DOE, and the DOC have worked to develop the comprehensive
LNMP and the draft legislation to implement it. The WSDA and DOE developed a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to clarify their respective and shared responsibilities
during this transition period for site inspections, nutrient management plans, dairy and CAFO
permit enforcement, and permit administration. Because the DOE has the delegated authority
from the EPA to carry out the Clean Water Act in Washington, including the NPDES program
for CAFOs, the DOE has retained responsibility for issuing water quality permits and coordinates
with the WSDA in taking action on water quality issues for AFOs and CAFOs. Until the
delegated authority is granted to the WSDA, the DOE will continue in that role. Other
organizations such as the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), the state
Conservation Commission and conservation districts, and Washington State University (WSU)
Extension, are recognized as providing producer education and technical assistance.
The 2003 legislation required the DOC to develop draft legislation including:
In 2004, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (New York, Vermont,
Connecticut) heard a consolidated case involving petitions against the EPA brought by both
environmental and agricultural organizations. The petitioners challenged a number of the
permitting requirements and effluent limitation guidelines contained in the February 2003 Final
Rule for concentrated animal feeding operations.
On February 28, 2005, the Second Circuit vacated provisions of the CAFO Rule that (1) allow
permitting authorities to issue permits without reviewing the terms of the nutrient management
plans; (2) allow permitting authorities to issue permits that do not include the terms of the
nutrient management plans; and (3) required CAFOs to apply for NPDES permits or otherwise
demonstrate that they have no potential to discharge. The Second Circuit also determined the
CAFO Rule violated the Clean Water Act's public participation requirements by failing to
provide public access to nutrient management plans. The Second Circuit remanded other aspects
of the CAFO Rule to the EPA for further clarification and analysis.
Summary of Bill:
Sections 1 and 2 - Applicability of Chapter and Findings
The Livestock Nutrient Management Program (Program) applies to all segments of the livestock
industry. The goals of the Program are to provide guidance to animal feeding operations about
their responsibilities under state and federal water quality laws and to implement requirements in
a consistent manner that will maintain a healthy and productive livestock industry in
Washington. Specific permit requirements created in the chapter are consistent with federal
CAFO rules. All dairies must implement nutrient management plans and submit certain reports.
The AFOs that are not CAFOs or dairies are not required to have permits or produce farm plans,
but they cannot pollute the state's waters and may be inspected by the WSDA.
Sections 3 - 13 - Amendments to the Dairy Nutrient Management Act - RCW 90.64
Definitions
Definitions are added, deleted or changed to reflect: the transfer of authority from the DOE and
conservation districts to the WSDA; expanded program applicability to all livestock operations,
not only dairies; key terms such as "animal feeding operations," small, medium and large
"concentrated animal feeding operations," "livestock nutrients," "nutrient management plans,"
"person," "permit," "pollution," and "waters of the state."
Designation as a CAFO through pollutant discharge
Consistent with federal CAFO rules, an AFO cannot be designated as a CAFO unless the WSDA
Director (Director) has conducted an on-site inspection and determined that the operation should
be regulated under the permit program. AFOs with numbers of animals below those designated
for a medium CAFO cannot be designated as a CAFO unless pollutants are discharged into
waters of the state through a man-made ditch, flushing system, or other man-made device or
originate outside of the facility or in some way come into direct contact with the animals
confined within and are determined to be a significant contributor of pollutants. When
considering designating an AFO as a CAFO due to discharge of pollution to the waters of the
state, the Director shall consider several factors including the effort by the AFO to stop the
discharge.
Inspections
The WSDA is authorized to conduct inspections to: determine if an AFO is a CAFO; ensure
compliance with state and federal water quality laws and rules; and determine if a CAFO is
complying with its permit. The WSDA is required to inspect all CAFOs and dairies at least once
every two years. Additional prioritization criteria for inspections include: proximity to shellfish
beds, permit status, compliance history, and other relevant factors to be determined by the
WSDA. During inspections, all CAFOs must make available those records required by permit.
Those AFOs and dairies that are not covered by permit must make available records such as
animal inventories to determine regulatory status, compliance, or qualification for special state
programs. The WSDA may conduct follow-up inspections to ensure that corrective actions are
being carried out.
Livestock Nutrient Management Plan
All CAFOs and dairies are required to develop a livestock nutrient management plan, have it
approved by the WSDA and certified by the WSDA and the livestock producer. This eliminates
the current role of the Conservation Commission and conservation districts in establishing
elements of the plans, approving and certifying them. Livestock producers must develop plans
using NRCS practice standards, although equivalent practices and standards may be used if the
WSDA determines through a technical review process that they provide the same or better
performance protection as NRCS standards.
Minimum elements and time frames for the plans are set out as specified in the federal rule for
CAFOs. Requirements and time lines for dairy plans are continued. Any appeals by producers
of the WSDA's decisions regarding nutrient management plans, including denial of the use of
alternative standards and practices, must be made to the Pollution Control Hearings Board rather
than the conservation districts. Producers may no longer request extensions of plan approval and
certification timelines due to financial hardships or local permitting delays, but can use existing
appeal processes.
Written complaints against livestock producers
Written complaints against livestock producers must be investigated within three working days.
A report of findings will be provided to the livestock producer and, on request, to the
complainant within 20 days after receiving the written complaint. The report of findings after
inspections of either oral or written complaints will be placed in the WSDA's administrative
records.
Authority for WSDA to implement LNMP
The WSDA is authorized to implement and administer a Livestock Nutrient Management
Program including enforcement, compliance, inspection, technical assistance, approval and
certification of livestock nutrient management plans, data management, communication and
outreach, and coordination with agencies that provide education and technical or financial
assistance.
Rulemaking and Funds
The WSDA may adopt rules to implement the chapter, including rules on the administration of
permit programs. In addition, the WSDA is given authority to adopt in rule provisions in
specified federal regulations, as well as rules that accommodate subsequent changes to EPA
regulations.
The existing Livestock Nutrient Management Grant Account and its residual fund balance is
moved to the Agricultural Local Fund.
Sections 14-36
Records and Disclosure
CAFOs must maintain certain records and reports as mandated by federal rule. Dairies that are
not CAFOs must maintain certain records and reports as specified by the WSDA. Information
from CAFOs and dairies is subject to public disclosure only to the extent required by specified
federal rules.
Education, Technical and Financial Assistance
The WSDA may coordinate with WSU, the Conservation Commission and conservation districts,
the DOE, or other agencies and organizations to implement an education program for nutrient
management improvement, and may refer producers to these groups for technical or financial
assistance.
At the request of a livestock producer, conservation districts may provide technical or financial
assistance in developing, revising, or implementing the producer's livestock nutrient management
plan, and may verify that the plan elements meet required standards. To the extent practical and
that funding allows, the Conservation Commission and conservation districts shall provide
technical and financial assistance to producers.
Advisory Committee
A Livestock Nutrient Management Program Advisory Committee is established including
representatives of the livestock industry, environmental community, local, state and federal
agencies, and others as determined by the WSDA.
NPDES Permitting and Fees
When EPA delegates authority under the federal Clean Water Act to the WSDA, and the DOE
relinquishes its authority to administer CAFO NPDES permits and other related duties, the
WSDA will be the state authority for the NPDES, AFO, and CAFO program. Until that time, the
DOE will remain responsible for NPDES permit administration as described in the MOU
between the WSDA and the DOE.
The requirements and processes for producers to obtain the NPDES permit once authority has
been delegated to the WSDA are described. The permit will be a combined state waste disposal
permit and federal NPDES permit, and will meet the requirements of both. A livestock operation
which meets the definition of a large CAFO may seek a determination from the WSDA that they
have no potential to discharge to the waters of the state. The Director will use a process and
criteria from federal rule to make the determination within 60 days. If affirmative, the CAFO
will not have to apply for permit coverage but is not relieved from liability should an actual
discharge occur.
After receiving the delegation of authority from EPA, the WSDA must establish by rule annual
NPDES permit administration fees to be used for costs the WSDA incurs for processing permit
applications and modifications, monitoring and evaluating compliance, conducting inspections,
securing laboratory analysis of samples, reviewing plans and documents, and supporting directly
related overhead expenses. The WSDA's initial annual NPDES permit fee schedule will be the
same as the existing DOE schedule, except that the fees may rise with the fiscal growth factor.
Until the initial fee schedule is adopted, the fees established by DOE are in effect.
Pollutant Discharge, Violations
It is illegal for those regulated under the LNMP to discharge into the waters of the state organic
or inorganic matter including livestock nutrients that shall cause or tend to cause pollution of the
waters. Duties of CAFOs and dairies in the event of a discharge to waters of the state are
specified.
The WSDA has the authority at any reasonable time to enter and conduct inspections of records
and facilities at AFOs, CAFOs, and dairies. The WSDA may seek a search warrant if denied
access and may bring legal action to carry out the purposes of the chapter.
Procedures are described for notification of violations and for the issuance of directives or orders
by the WSDA. Penalties consistent with the Clean Water Act are prescribed for those found
guilty of violating the chapter. Any enforcement action by the WSDA related to discharges must
attempt to minimize the possibility of converting agricultural land to nonagricultural uses.
Sections 37-45
The authority of the Pollution Control Hearings Board is expanded to hear and decide appeals of
decisions by the WSDA.
Section 17, establishing the Livestock Nutrient Management Advisory Committee, will take
effect July 1, 2006, upon the expiration of an existing committee.
Amendments are made to various statutes updating definitions and references and repealing
outdated sections.
Throughout the Bill
To execute the transfer of authority from the DOE to the WSDA, many references throughout the
bill are changed from the DOE to the WSDA.
To execute the broadening of program applicability beyond dairies, many references throughout
the bill are changed from "dairy" or "dairy farm" to "livestock," "AFO," or
" CAFO."
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed, except for section 17, relating to establishment of a livestock nutrient management program advisory committee, which takes effect July 1, 2006.