Brief Description: Placing limitations on employee noncompetition agreements in the broadcasting industry.

Sponsors: Senate Committee on Labor, Commerce, Research & Development (originally sponsored by Senators Keiser, Franklin and McAuliffe).

Hearing Date: 3/24/05

Staff: Jill Reinmuth (786-7134).

Background:

Noncompetition clauses are provisions within an employment contract that restrict an employee from competing with his or her employer. These clauses typically restrict an employee from engaging in business activities in which the employee competes with the employer, or accepting employment with another business that competes with the employer. They also restrict an employee's activities for a specific period of time and in a specific geographic area.

Washington courts enforce "reasonable" noncompetition clauses. Courts consider three factors when deciding if a clause is reasonable:

• Whether restraining the employee from performing services is necessary for the protection of the business or goodwill of the employer.
• Whether the clause harms the employee more than is reasonably necessary to secure the employer's business or goodwill.
• Whether the loss of the employee's services and skills injures the public to a degree warranting nonenforcement of the clause.

Courts also look at the relative bargaining power of the employee and employer upon entering the employment relationship, and the motives of both when terminating the relationship.

Summary of Bill:

An employee noncompetion agreement is void and unenforceable if the broadcasting industry employer terminates without just cause or lays off the employee subject to the agreement.

Broadcasting industry employers maintain their rights to protect trade secrets or other proprietary information by lawful means.

Broadcasting industry employers and employees also maintain any rights or liabilities resulting from employee noncompetition agreements entered into before December 31, 2005.

Various terms, including "employee," "employer," "broadcasting industry", and "employee noncompetition agreement," are defined.

Rules Authority: The bill does not contain provisions addressing the rule-making powers of an agency.

Appropriation: None.

Fiscal Note: Not requested.

Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.