Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Criminal Justice & Corrections Committee | |
SSB 6320
Brief Description: Revising the model policy for disclosure of sex offender information.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Human Services & Corrections (originally sponsored by Senators Regala, Brandland, Franklin, Doumit, Rasmussen, Carrell, Haugen, Pridemore, Kline, Stevens, Keiser, Berkey, Thibaudeau, Jacobsen, Pflug, Sheldon, Kohl-Welles, McAuliffe, Roach and Benton).
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 2/17/06
Staff: Jim Morishima (786-7191).
Background:
In 1990, the Legislature enacted the Community Protection Act, which created one of the first
sex offender registration laws in the country. A person convicted of a sex or kidnapping offense
must register with the county sheriff of the county in which he or she resides. An offender must
provide a variety of information when registering including his or her name, address, date and
place of birth, place of employment, crime of conviction, date and place of conviction, aliases,
social security number, photograph, and fingerprints. The offender must also notify the county
sheriff if he or she is enrolled in a public or private school or in an institution of higher
education. Failure to meet the registration requirements is an unranked class C felony.
Law enforcement agencies are authorized to release information regarding registered sex
offenders based on the offenders' risk level, which is initially assigned by the Department of
Corrections' End of Sentence Review Committee and may subsequently be re-assigned by law
enforcement. For example, for risk level I offenders (evaluated as the lowest level of risk within
the larger community), a law enforcement agency may only disclose information about the
offenders to specified persons and entities; e.g., schools, victims, witnesses. In contrast, for risk
level III offenders (evaluated as the most risky to the community), a law enforcement agency may
disclose information about the offenders to the public at large.
In 1997, the Legislature directed the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs
(WASPC) to develop a model policy for law enforcement agencies to follow when disclosing sex
offender information to the public. The model policy has not been significantly revised since its
creation in 1997.
Summary of Bill:
When funded, the WASPC must convene a sex offender model policy work group to develop a
model policy for law enforcement agencies and other criminal justice personnel. When
convened, the work group must conduct community meetings around the state to assess the
practices and needs of communities and identify best practices on sex offender registration,
community notification, and strategies on sex offender management.
The model policy must contain recommendations on the following issues:
When developing the policy, the WASPC must consult with the following groups: the
Department of Corrections, the Department of Social and Health Services, the Indeterminate
Sentence Review Board, the Washington State Council of Police Officers, local correctional
agencies, the Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, the Washington Public Defender
Association, the Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the Washington
Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, victim advocates, the Office of the
Superintendent of Public Instruction, the Association of Washington Cities, the Criminal Justice
Training Commission, and the Washington Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs.
Once input from stakeholders has been received the work group must present a model policy to
the WASPC for adoption or rejection. If the policy is adopted, the work group must conduct
meetings around the state with law enforcement and other criminal justice personnel to review
the model policy and conduct training. The task force will then be dissolved and the WASPC
will take over the promotion of the model policy.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available on companion HB 2747.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed. However, the bill is null and void unless funded in the budget.