Washington State House of Representatives Office of Program Research |
BILL ANALYSIS |
Technology, Energy & Communications Committee | |
SSJM 8018
Brief Description: Requesting that the proposal to transition the Bonneville Power Administration from cost-based rates to market-based rates be rejected.
Sponsors: Senate Committee on Water, Energy & Environment (originally sponsored by Senators Fraser, Parlette, Poulsen, Hewitt, Berkey, Zarelli, Prentice, Doumit, Rockefeller, Fairley, Rasmussen, Kohl-Welles, Schoesler, Brandland, Schmidt, Shin, Pridemore, Mulliken, Honeyford, Brown, Kline and Regala).
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
Hearing Date: 3/17/05
Staff: Sarah Dylag (786-7109).
Background:
Created in 1937, the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is a federal agency under the
United States Department of Energy. The BPA provides about half the electricity used in the
Northwest. The BPA owns and operates more than three-fourths of the region's high-voltage
transmission system with over 15,000 miles of line covering 300,000 square miles. The area
includes primarily Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Western Montana and portions of contiguous
states. The BPA markets wholesale electrical power at cost from federal dams, one non-federal
nuclear plant, and other non-federal hydroelectric and wind energy generation facilities.
The BPA is not tax supported. Instead, the BPA recovers all of its costs through the sales of
electricity and transmission and repays the United States Treasury in full with interest for any
money it borrows.
On February 7, 2005, the President of the United States sent his 2006 budget to the United States
Congress. Included in that budget is a proposal that would require the BPA to set rates based on
market prices instead of the actual cost of producing electricity. The proposal also seeks to
increase the types of transactions that would count against the BPA's borrowing authority debt
limit.
Summary of Bill:
The Legislature requests that the proposal to transition the BPA from cost-based rates to
market-based rates be rejected. The Legislature also requests that the proposal to add additional
transactions for inclusion into the BPA's authorized debt limit be rejected.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.