SENATE BILL REPORT
HB 1668
As Reported By Senate Committee On:
Judiciary, March 30, 2005
Title: An act relating to the administrative office of the courts.
Brief Description: Changing provisions relating to the administrative office of the courts.
Sponsors: Representatives Lantz and Priest; by request of Board For Judicial Administration.
Brief History: Passed House: 2/28/05, 90-0.
Committee Activity: Judiciary: 3/23/05, 3/30/05 [DP, DNP].
SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
Majority Report: Do pass.Signed by Senators Kline, Chair; Weinstein, Vice Chair; Johnson, Ranking Minority Member; Esser, Hargrove, McCaslin, Rasmussen and Thibaudeau.
Minority Report: Do not pass.Signed by Senator Carrell.
Staff: Aldo Melchiori (786-7439)
Background: The Administrator for the Courts (administrator) is appointed by the Washington
Supreme Court from a list of five persons submitted by the Governor. The administrator manages
various aspects of the state court system, such as fostering court efficiency, training personnel,
designing forms, developing standards, and controlling costs. The administrator may not be over
the age of 60 when appointed to office. Neither the administrator nor assistants may practice law
during their tenure.
The administrator studies the need for new judicial positions using a weighted caseload analysis.
In 2002, the Legislature changed the method for determining the need for new district court
judges from the weighted caseload analysis to an "objective workload analysis," but did not enact
this change with respect to superior court judge positions.
In 2000, the Board for Judicial Administration formed the Project 2001 Committee to study and
make recommendations on ways to improve the operation of the courts. The final report of the
committee called on the Board for Judicial Administration to promote the establishment of court
coordination councils in each jurisdiction. The councils work to promote the maximum utilization
of judicial and other court resources by developing and implementing comprehensive trial court
coordination plans.
Summary of Bill: The name of the Office of the Administrator for the Courts (OAC) is changed
to the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC). References throughout the code are changed
to reflect the name change.
The requirement that the Administrator of the Courts is appointed from a list of five persons
submitted by the Governor is removed. The administrator is appointed by the Supreme Court.
The requirement that the administrator not be over 60 years old at the time of appointment is
removed. The duties of the administrator are amended to include using state funds to improve
the operation of the courts and providing support for court coordinating councils. The
administrator and his or her assistants are authorized to practice law to provide pro bono legal
services and legal services to family members, as long as the legal services do not interfere with
official duties.
The weighted caseload analysis that is currently used to examine the need for new superior court
judicial positions is replaced with the "objective workload analysis" currently used to determine
the need for new district court judges.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: The name change more accurately reflects the nature of the office. It is not the administrator's office, it is an administrative office. The Governor agrees that the Supreme Court should have authority to appoint the administrator without the Governor's nomination.
Testimony Against: None.
Who Testified: PRO: Janet McLane, Administrator for the Courts.