SENATE BILL REPORT
SHB 3059
As Reported By Senate Committee On:
Ways & Means, February 21, 2006
Title: An act relating to clarifying the application of taxes to the financial activities of professional employer organizations.
Brief Description: Clarifying the application of taxes to the financial activities of professional employer organizations.
Sponsors: House Committee on Finance (originally sponsored by Representatives Grant, Condotta, Cody and Kessler).
Brief History: Passed House: 2/11/06, 91-3.
Committee Activity: Ways & Means: 2/21/06 [DP, DNP].
SENATE COMMITTEE ON WAYS & MEANS
Majority Report: Do pass.Signed by Senators Prentice, Chair; Fraser, Vice Chair, Capital Budget Chair; Doumit, Vice Chair, Operating Budget; Zarelli, Ranking Minority Member; Brandland, Fairley, Kohl-Welles, Parlette, Pridemore, Rasmussen, Roach, Rockefeller and Schoesler.
Minority Report: Do not pass.Signed by Senator Regala.
Staff: Dean Carlson (786-7305)
Background: The business and occupation (B&O) tax is imposed on the gross receipts of
business activities without any deduction for the costs of doing business. However, a business
that acts as an agent for another business is not liable for B&O tax on amounts that merely "pass
through" the agent as reimbursement for expenses incurred by the agent on behalf of the agent's
client. For example, an attorney might pay court costs on behalf of a client. When the attorney
is reimbursed for those costs by the client, the attorney is not liable for B&O tax on the
reimbursements. The attorney is only liable for B&O tax on amounts charged as fees for the
attorney's services.
Some businesses utilize the services of other firms to provide employee related services, such as
human resource management, payroll and employee tax compliance, and employee fringe benefit
packages. The firms providing these services charge their clients amounts which include both
payments to the employees and fees charged for the employee related services. These firms have
been paying B&O tax on the amounts received as fees for the employee services but not on the
amounts received for payment to the employees as wages and benefits.
In December 2002, the Washington Supreme Court decided a case that clarified when payments
can be treated as a "pass through" and when tax is applied to the entire amount. The decision
involved taxes imposed by the City of Tacoma, but the logic of the court's opinion applies equally
to state B&O taxes.
Summary of Bill: A professional employer organization is a firm providing employee related
services to clients where the client's employer rights, duties, and obligations have been allocated
between the client and the professional employer organization.
Professional employer organizations pay B&O tax at the 1.5 percent service rate. A deduction
is provided from gross income for amounts representing the actual cost of wages and salaries,
benefits, workers compensation, payroll taxes, withholding, and other assessments paid on behalf
of the client. Cities must provide professional employer organizations the same tax treatment
under their B&O taxes.
Professional employer organizations are not liable for sales and use taxes not properly collected
on selling activities by their clients.
Clients, and not the professional employer organization, are eligible for various credits,
exemptions, and other tax incentives. The client, and not the professional employer organization,
is responsible for filing surveys related to tax incentives.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect on July 1, 2006.
Testimony For: None.
Testimony Against: None.
Who Testified: No one.