SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 5239
As of February 21, 2005
Title: An act relating to limiting lien authority against a residential homeowner.
Brief Description: Limiting lien authority against a residential homeowner.
Sponsors: Senators Kohl-Welles, Fraser, Keiser, Franklin, Prentice and Rockefeller; by request of Department of Labor & Industries.
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Labor, Commerce, Research & Development: 2/3/05.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON LABOR, COMMERCE, RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
Staff: John Dziedzic (786-7784)
Background: When equipment providers, material suppliers, or subcontractors (potential lien
claimants) or workers do not receive payment for the goods and services supplied to a
construction project, including a homeowner's single-family residence construction or remodel
project, those suppliers of goods and services can file a lien against the homeowner's property.
When a potential lien claimant works through "prime" or "general" contractor, the potential lien
claimant must first notify the homeowner, in writing, that the potential lien claimant has the right
to claim a lien. This notice establishes the potential lien claimant's rights with respect to goods
or services that were supplied to a remodel project up to 60 days prior to the notice; or up to ten
days prior to the notice on a project for the construction of a new single-family residence.
To pursue a lien claim, a claimant providing a "notice of right to claim a lien" must: (1) record
the lien with the county recording office not later than 90 days after the claimant last provided
services, materials or equipment to the homeowner's project; (2) commence an action to enforce
the lien within eight months of the date the lien is recorded; and (3) complete the action to enforce
the lien within two years after the action was commenced.
Summary of Bill: A potential lien claimant providing proper "notice of right to claim a lien"
may claim a lien for goods or services supplied to the new construction, repair, alteration or
remodel of a single-family residence or appurtenant garage after notice was given.
The maximum lien that may be claimed for services, materials, or equipment supplied to the new
construction, repair, alteration or remodel of a single-family residence or appurtenant garage is
the lesser of: (1) the actual amount designated in the contract for such goods or services that is
not yet paid to the prime contractor by the owner at the time the owner receives the notice of the
right to claim the lien; or (2) 10 percent of the actual amounts designated in the contract for such
goods or services. The notice of right to claim a lien form is modified accordingly.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: This proposal represents two provisions of the comprehensive lien law update that were removed from the bill that passed four years ago. It will help prevent consumers from having to pay twice for the same work on a residential remodel or construction project.
Testimony Against: The proposal unfairly shifts the blame to suppliers and subcontractors for contractor financial mismanagement. It is bad public policy executed poorly.
Who Testified: PRO: Patrick Woods, Dept. of Labor & Industries; Sandy Swarthout, WA
Homeowners Coalition; Elizabeth Morse, homeowner; Brian Minnich, Building Industry Assoc.
of WA; Bob Blayden, Blayden Design Build; John Bratten, JW Bratten Construction.
CON: Bob Gee, Western Building Materials Assoc.; Jeff Swan, Evergreen Lumber; Debbie
deBoer, Janet Cole, National Assoc. of Credit Managers; Kerry Lawrence, Attorney.