SENATE BILL REPORT
SB 5368
As Reported By Senate Committee On:
Health & Long-Term Care, February 24, 2005
Title: An act relating to revising the mandatory overtime prohibition applicable to nurses, but only with respect to increasing the types of health care facilities that are subject to the prohibition from requiring nurses to perform overtime work and limiting the exceptions from the prohibition related to prescheduled on-call time and completion of patient care procedures.
Brief Description: Modifying the nurse mandatory overtime prohibition.
Sponsors: Senators Keiser, Benton, Kastama, Thibaudeau, Franklin, McAuliffe and Rasmussen.
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Health & Long-Term Care: 2/7/05, 2/24/05 [DPS-WM, DNP, w/oRec].
SENATE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH & LONG-TERM CARE
Majority Report: That Substitute Senate Bill No. 5368 be substituted therefor, and the substitute bill do pass and be referred to Committee on Ways & Means.Signed by Senators Keiser, Chair; Thibaudeau, Vice Chair; Franklin, Kastama, Kline and Poulsen.
Minority Report: Do not pass.Signed by Senators Benson and Brandland.
Minority Report: That it be referred without recommendation.Signed by Senators Johnson and Parlette.
Staff: Jonathan Seib (786-7427)
Background: Both federal and Washington minimum wage laws establish requirements related
to overtime work. These laws require covered employees to receive overtime pay for hours
worked over 40 hours per week. Another state law requires overtime compensation for certain
full-time employees, including nursing staff, of state institutions under the control of the
Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) or the Department of Corrections (DOC) after
eight hours of work in a work day or 40 hours of work in a work week. With some exceptions,
these wage laws do not prohibit an employer from requiring employees to work overtime.
One exception enacted in 2002 prohibits covered health care facilities from requiring overtime,
except in limited circumstances, for registered nurses and licensed practical nurses who are
involved in direct patient care and paid an hourly wage. For this overtime prohibition law,
overtime means work in excess of an agreed upon, regularly scheduled shift of not more than 12
hours in a 24 hour period or 80 hours in a 14 day period. A health care facility means a facility
that is licensed under specified laws as a hospital, a hospice, a rural health care facility, or a
psychiatric hospital. A nursing home or a home health agency is considered part of a health care
facility if the nursing home or home health agency is operating under the license of the health care
facility.
The state psychiatric hospitals and other institutions operated by DSHS or DOC are not licensed
under the statutes specified in the overtime prohibition law. Home health agencies are not
authorized to operate under a license of a health care facility.
Summary of Substitute Bill: The following entities are added to the list of health care facilities covered by the overtime prohibition law for certain registered and licensed practical nurses:
Overtime requirements for certain employees of DSHS or DOC who are entitled to overtime
compensation are subject to the overtime prohibition law if they are covered employees of a
health care facility under that law.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill: The substitute bill removes the section which narrowed the existing "on-call" exceptions to the prohibition on mandatory overtime for nurses.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Effective Date: Ninety days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Testimony For: The same standards should apply to the state facilities as apply to private
facilities. The current law hinders recruitment at public facilities. Some facilities have
implemented mandatory on-call rather than overtime. This bill would not prohibit voluntary
overtime. Increased demands on nurses are making the field less desirable and are contributing
to a nursing shortage. Higher medical errors occur as a result of having to work longer hours; this
is a patient safety issue.
Testimony Against: The narrowing of the exceptions is concerning, and continuing to limit the
exceptions will lead to problems in access to patient care. Having the opportunity to quickly
respond to unexpected surges in demand is critical. Pre-scheduled on call is sometimes
necessary for rural hospitals to manage patient census fluctuation and surgical procedure
scheduling. This issue should be negotiated on local levels between hospitals and unions.
Who Testified: PRO: Sharon Ness, UFCW; Mike Dyer, SEIU 1199 NW; Kim Armstrong,
Washington State Nurses Association.
CON: Lisa Thatcher, Taya Briley, Washington State Hospital Association; Craig Wilson, Kittitas
Valley Community Hospital.