SENATE BILL REPORT
SJM 8028
As Reported By Senate Committee On:
Health & Long-Term Care, January 18, 2006
Brief Description: Requesting Congress to allow states to decide whether marijuana should be used legally for medicinal purposes.
Sponsors: Senators Kohl-Welles, Keiser, Thibaudeau, McCaslin and Kline.
Brief History:
Committee Activity: Health & Long-Term Care: 1/16/06, 1/18/06 [DP].
SENATE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH & LONG-TERM CARE
Majority Report: Do pass.Signed by Senators Keiser, Chair; Thibaudeau, Vice Chair; Deccio, Ranking Minority Member; Benson, Franklin, Kline, Parlette and Poulsen.
Staff: Edith Rice (786-7444)
Background: Under Initiative Measure No. 692, approved November 3, 1998, the citizens of
the state of Washington intended to allow for the limited medical use of marijuana by patients
with terminal or debilitating illnesses. Such patients and their primary caregivers will not be
found guilty of a crime for possession and limited use of marijuana under state law. Physicians
who authorize marijuana use to qualifying patients are excepted from liability and prosecution
for doing so.
Nine states have approved, through the initiative process, the protection of patients who possess
or grow medical marijuana with their doctor's approval. Those who support its therapeutic use
claim that it reduces pain, relieves nausea and muscle spasms, and can increase the appetite of
patients suffering from wasting disease.
Marijuana is listed as a Schedule I drug according to the Federal Controlled Substances Act of
1970. Schedule I drugs are described as having the highest potential for abuse and no current
accepted medical use. As recently as June, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on the issue
of medical use of marijuana. The court ruled in Gonzales v. Raich that Congress's constitutional
authority to regulate the interstate market in drugs, licit or illicit, extends to small, homegrown
quantities of marijuana, even in states that have eliminated sanctions for its medicinal use. In
other words, the federal government can still ban its possession even if a state does not. The result
of this ruling is that those who use marijuana for medicinal purposes in compliance with state
law, still run the risk of legal action by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration or other
federal agencies. The state law provides no defense.
Summary of Bill: The Washington State Legislature requests that Congress adopt federal legislation to allow states to decide individually whether to allow marijuana to be used for medical purposes. Such use is limited to personal, medicinal use only and is not to be bought, sold, or transferred for interstate commerce.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Committee/Commission/Task Force Created: No.
Testimony For: Raids by federal law enforcement officials are intimidating to those using marijuana for medicinal purposes; states should have the right to determine what is best for our state's citizens.
Testimony Against: None.
Who Testified: PRO: Greg Carter, M..D., Douglas Hiatt, Jennifer Shaw, American Civil
Liberties Union, Martin Martinez, Medical Marijuana Patient Representative, Larry Little.
CON: None.