BILL REQ. #: H-2210.2
State of Washington | 59th Legislature | 2005 Regular Session |
READ FIRST TIME 03/04/05.
AN ACT Relating to creating a task force to review health care facilities and services supply issues; and creating new sections.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 The legislature finds that:
(1) Since the enactment of certificate of need legislation in 1979,
the widespread adoption of new health care technologies has resulted in
significant advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of disease, and
has enabled substantial expansion of sites where complex care and
surgery can be performed;
(2) New and existing technologies, as well as supply sensitive
health services, drive substantial health care expenditures. Yet,
evidence related to their effectiveness is not routinely or
systematically considered in decision making regarding widespread
adoption of these technologies and services. The principles of
evidence-based medicine call for comprehensive review of data and
studies related to a particular health care service or device, with
emphasis given to high quality, objective studies. Findings regarding
the effectiveness of these health services or devices should then be
applied to increase the likelihood that they will be used
appropriately;
(3) The standards governing whether a certificate of need should be
granted in RCW 70.38.115 focus largely on broad concepts of access to
and availability of health services, with only limited consideration of
cost-effectiveness. Moreover, the standards do not provide distinct
guidance for decision making or comparing the merits of certificate of
need applications. The standards governing whether bonds should be
issued to finance development and acquisition of health care facilities
and equipment in RCW 70.37.050 are explicitly linked to the certificate
of need process; and
(4) The certificate of need statute should be reexamined and
updated to reflect changes in health care delivery and financing since
its enactment.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2 (1) A task force is created to study and
prepare recommendations to the governor and the legislature related to
improving and updating the certificate of need program in chapter 70.38
RCW. The report must be submitted to the governor and appropriate
committees of the legislature by October 1, 2006. Members of the task
force must be appointed by the governor. The task force members shall
elect a member of the task force to serve as chair. Members of the
task force include:
(a) Four representatives of the legislature, including one member
appointed by each caucus of the house of representatives and the
senate;
(b) Two representatives of private employer-sponsored health
benefits purchasers;
(c) One representative of labor organizations that purchase health
benefits through Taft-Hartley plans;
(d) One representative of health carriers;
(e) Two representatives of health care consumers;
(f) One health care economist;
(g) The secretary of the department of social and health services,
or his or her designee;
(h) The administrator of the health care authority, or his or her
designee; and
(i) The secretary of the department of health.
(2) The task force shall establish one or more technical advisory
committees composed of affected health care providers and other
individuals or entities who can serve as a source of technical
expertise. The task force shall actively consult with, and solicit
recommendations from, the technical advisory committee or committees
regarding issues under consideration by the task force.
(3) In conducting the study and preparing recommendations, the task
force shall be guided by the following principles:
(a) The supply of health services has a substantial impact on
utilization of services, independent of the effectiveness, medical
necessity, or appropriateness of a particular health service for a
particular individual;
(b) Given that health care resources are not unlimited, the impact
of any new health service or facility on overall health expenditures in
the state must be considered; and
(c) Given ongoing advances in evidence-based medicine and our
increasing ability to measure the quality and outcomes of health
services, the likelihood that a requested new health facility, service,
or equipment will improve health care quality and outcomes must be
considered.
(4) The task force shall, at a minimum, examine and develop
recommendations related to the following issues:
(a) The need for a new and periodically updated state health plan;
(b) A review of the purpose and goals of the current certificate of
need program;
(c) The scope of facilities, services, and capital expenditures
that should be subject to certificate of need review, including
consideration of:
(i) Acquisitions of major medical equipment, meaning a single unit
of medical equipment or a single system of components with related
functions used to provide medical and other health services that cost
one million two hundred thousand dollars or more, adjusted annually to
reflect the change in the consumer price index, medical index;
(ii) Capital expenditures, meaning the obligation by or on behalf
of a health care facility of any capital expenditure of two million
dollars or more, adjusted annually to reflect the change in the
consumer price index, medical index;
(iii) The offering or development of any new health care service,
as defined in RCW 48.43.005, that meets any of the following:
(A) The obligation of any capital expenditures by or on behalf of
a health care facility of one hundred ten thousand dollars or more that
is associated with the addition of a health service that was not
offered on a regular basis by or on behalf of the health care facility
within the twelve-month period prior to the time the services would be
offered;
(B) The addition of equipment or services, by transfer of
ownership, acquisition by lease, donation, transfer, or acquisition of
control, through management agreement or otherwise, that was not
offered on a regular basis by or on behalf of the health care facility
or the private office of a licensed health care provider regulated
under Title 18 RCW or chapter 70.127 RCW within the twelve-month period
prior to the time the services would be offered and that for the third
fiscal year of operation, including a partial first year following
acquisition of that equipment or service, is projected to entail
incremental operating costs or annual gross revenue directly
attributable to that health service in excess of five hundred thousand
dollars;
(iv) The scope of health care facilities subject to certificate of
need requirements, to include consideration of hospitals, including
specialty hospitals, psychiatric hospitals, nursing facilities, kidney
disease treatment centers including freestanding hemodialysis
facilities, rehabilitation facilities, ambulatory surgical facilities,
independent radiological service centers, independent cardiac
catheterization centers, or cancer treatment centers. "Health care
facility" includes the office of a private health care practitioner in
which surgical procedures are performed;
(d) The criteria for review of certificate of need applications, as
currently defined in RCW 70.38.115, with the goal of having criteria
that are consistent, clear, technically sound, and reflect state law,
including consideration of:
(i) Public need for the proposed services as demonstrated by
certain factors, including, but not limited to:
(A) Whether, and the extent to which, the project will
substantially address specific health problems as measured by health
needs in the area to be served by the project;
(B) Whether the project will have a positive impact on the health
status indicators of the population to be served;
(C) Whether there is a substantial risk that the project would
result in inappropriate increases in service utilization or the cost of
health services, based upon the principles of evidence-based medicine;
(D) Whether the services affected by the project will be accessible
to all residents of the area proposed to be served; and
(E) Whether the project will provide demonstrable improvements in
quality and outcome measures applicable to the services proposed in the
project, including whether there is data to indicate that the proposed
health services would constitute innovations in high quality health
care delivery;
(ii) Impact of the proposed services on the orderly and economic
development of health facilities and health resources for the state as
demonstrated by:
(A) The impact of the project on total health care expenditures
after taking into account, to the extent practical, both the costs and
benefits of the project and the competing demands in the local service
area and statewide for available resources for health care;
(B) The impact of the project on the ability of existing community
providers and facilities to continue to serve uninsured or underinsured
residents of the community and meet demands for emergency care;
(C) The availability of state funds to cover any increase in state
costs associated with utilization of the project's services; and
(D) The likelihood that more effective, more accessible, or less
costly alternative technologies or methods of service delivery may
become available;
(e) The timeliness and consistency of certificate of need reviews
and decisions, the sufficiency of resources available to the department
of health to conduct timely reviews, the means by which the department
of health projects future need for services, the ability to reflect
differences among communities and approaches to providing services, and
clarification on the use of the concurrent review process; and
(f) Mechanisms to monitor the commitments made by facilities that
have received a certificate of need, including those related to the
provision of charity care and access to health services to medicaid and
medicare beneficiaries as well as underinsured and uninsured members of
the community.