BILL REQ. #:  H-3221.5 



_____________________________________________ 

HOUSE BILL 2491
_____________________________________________
State of Washington59th Legislature2006 Regular Session

By Representatives Jarrett and Woods

Prefiled 1/6/2006. Read first time 01/09/2006.   Referred to Committee on Transportation.



     AN ACT Relating to regional transportation governance; amending RCW 47.56.076, 36.120.050, 36.120.130, 36.120.020, 36.120.030, 36.120.040, 36.120.070, 36.120.190, 81.112.030, 35.58.2795, 35.95A.030, 35.95A.070, 35.95A.080, 35.95A.090, 35.95A.100, 36.120.090, 36.120.110, 36.120.140, 47.26.080, 47.26.086, 47.80.020, 47.80.030, 47.80.040, 47.80.060, and 81.112.040; adding a new section to chapter 82.80 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 47.56 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 82.14 RCW; adding a new chapter to Title 36 RCW; creating new sections; providing a contingent effective date; and providing for submission of this act to a vote of the people.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

PART I
BASIC ORGANIZATION

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 101   LEGISLATIVE INTENT. The legislature finds that increased demands on transportation resources require increased integration of decision making within urbanized regions. The number of agencies involved in transportation planning and delivery of services has significantly added to the complexity of transportation programs.
     The legislature further finds that coordinated planning, investment in, and operation of transportation systems by the state and by local governments, can help ensure an efficient, effective transportation system that ensures mobility and addresses community needs. Improved planning, investment, and operation can also enhance local and state objectives for effective regional transportation strategies and effective coordination between land use and transportation.
     The legislature further finds that addressing this need for better accountability and coordinated action regarding transportation and comprehensive planning necessitates an innovative approach. Improved integration among transportation programs, particularly in the state's largest metropolitan area is imperative, and will have significant benefit to the citizens of Washington. This integrated approach to regional transportation planning and finance is required in both the near term and the long term.
     The legislature further finds that it is the will of the citizens of Washington to have a single regional government council to assume responsibility for the metropolitan planning function and be the designated regional transportation planning organization for its area.
     It is therefore the policy of the state of Washington to provide the authority for the citizens of the central Puget Sound counties to create a single regional government council, more directly accountable to the public, with adequate resources to develop and encourage implementation of a comprehensive transportation plan within the state's largest urbanized region.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 102   DEFINITIONS. Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter.
     (1) "Authority" means the Puget Sound regional transportation system authority created under section 103 of this act.
     (2) "Council" means the Puget Sound regional transportation system authority council created under section 105 of this act, and the governing body of the district.
     (3) "Policy advisory committee" or "committee" means the policy advisory committee authorized in section 202 of this act.
     (4) "Public transportation providers" means those agencies providing transit services to the public including public agencies that operate ferries, regional transit authorities, public transit agencies, and city transportation authorities.
     (5) "Puget Sound regional council" means the Puget Sound regional council, which, as of January 1, 2006, is the organization designated by units of general purpose local governments within the region as the metropolitan planning organization under federal requirements and as the regional transportation organization under chapter 47.80 RCW, or any successor organization.
     (6) "Project of regional significance" means those projects identified by the characteristics set forth in section 201 (3) and (4) of this act.
     (7) "Region" means that area within the jurisdiction of the council.
     (8) "Regional transportation investment plan" or "plan" means a regional transportation investment plan as defined in RCW 36.120.020, until the later of (a) January 1, 2008, or (b) approval by the voters of formation of the regional transportation system authority under section 507 of this act, upon either of which event "regional transportation investment plan" or "plan" means the plan prepared by the council under section 201 of this act.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 103   SYSTEM AUTHORITY CREATED. A political subdivision known as the Puget Sound regional transportation system authority is created, subject to section 507 of this act, to consist of the counties that are included within the regional transportation planning organization having the largest population on January 1, 2005, known as "central Puget Sound counties."

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 104   COUNCILOR DISTRICTS. By May 1, 2007, the legislative authorities of the central Puget Sound counties shall jointly assemble and determine eight councilor districts, based on equal populations.
     The counties shall provide for the nomination and election of nonpartisan authority councilors at the state's September primary and November general elections.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 105   AUTHORITY COUNCIL. (1) Creation and powers. The authority council is created as the governing body of the Puget Sound regional transportation system authority. Except as provided for in this chapter, all authority powers are vested in the council.
     (2) Composition. Beginning January 1, 2008, the council consists of nine nonpartisan councilors, one elected at large and designated as president of the council, and eight nominated and elected from individual districts within the region.
     (3) Initial terms of office. The terms of office of the four councilors receiving the highest number of votes among the eight councilors elected in 2007 end on the first Monday of 2012. The terms of office of the other four councilors end on the first Monday of 2009. Thereafter the term of office of councilor is four years. The first term of the president ends the first Monday of 2012.
     (4) Presiding officer, council president. The council president presides over the council. The council president sets the council agenda subject to general rules established by a council-adopted ordinance. Except as provided otherwise in this chapter, the council president appoints all members of the committees, commissions, and boards created by the rules of the council and ordinances of the authority.
     (5) Annual organizing resolution. At the first council meeting each January the council shall adopt an annual organizing resolution naming a deputy and establishing such committees as the council deems necessary for the orderly conduct of council business.
     (6) Council meetings. The council shall meet regularly in the area at times and places it designates. The council shall prescribe by ordinance the rules to govern conduct of its meetings. Except as this chapter provides otherwise, the agreement of a majority of councilors present and constituting a quorum is necessary to decide affirmatively a question before the council.
     (7) Quorum. A majority of councilors in office is a quorum for council business, but fewer councilors may compel absent councilors to attend.
     (8) Record of proceedings. The council shall keep and authenticate a record of council proceedings.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 106   AUTHORITY AUDITOR. (1) Creation. The office of authority auditor is created. The auditor is elected at large for a term of four years. The auditor serves full time and may not be employed by any other person or entity while serving as auditor.
     (2) First election; disqualification for councilor. The auditor is first nominated and elected in the first statewide primary and general election in 2007. During the term for which elected, and for four years thereafter, the auditor is ineligible to hold the office of authority councilor.
     (3) Duties. The auditor shall: (a) Make continuous investigations of the operations of the authority, including financial and performance auditing, review of agency performance measures, and review of financial transactions, personnel, equipment, facilities, and all other aspects of those operations; and (b) make reports to the council of the results of any investigation with any recommendations for remedial action. Except as provided in this section, the auditor may not be given responsibility to perform any executive function.

PART II
POWERS AND DUTIES

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 201   COUNCIL'S DUTIES. The council shall:
     (1) Be the designated regional transportation planning organization for its area and have, except where provided otherwise, the same duties and obligations of those organizations as prescribed in chapter 47.80 RCW;
     (2) Assume the responsibility for the metropolitan planning function within the region, and act as the governing body for that activity, to the fullest extent permitted by 23 U.S.C. Sec. 134. The jurisdiction and power of any existing metropolitan planning organization, and its plans or programs necessary to obtain federal transportation funds or to maintain compliance with federal clean air laws, remain in full force and effect until the council is recognized by applicable federal government units as the metropolitan planning organization for each county represented by the council;
     (3) Identify those transportation facilities and services within the region provided by the department of transportation, cities, counties, public transportation providers, and other publicly financed transportation providers that serve regionally significant corridors or are otherwise regionally significant;
     (4) Prepare and adopt a plan setting forth the priorities for investment and the allocation of resources for operating and investment for those regionally significant transportation facilities and services for each of those agencies enumerated in subsection (3) of this section. The goal is an integrated and systematic approach for investment resulting in a coordinated transportation network. To achieve this goal:
     (a) The council may enter into interlocal contracts and memoranda of understanding for the affected agencies to reimburse the council for the costs of these planning functions; and
     (b) The plan shall use tax revenues and related debt for investments that generally provide network benefits to a subarea or county of the district authority in proportion to the general level of tax revenues generated within that subarea or county. This geographic equity principle applies to the overall investment plan and not within investments in specific modes of transportation in the plan. This geographic equity principle applies to all modifications to the plan, appropriation of contingency funds not identified within the project estimate, and future phases of the plan. During implementation of the plan, the council shall retain the flexibility to manage distribution of revenues, debt, and project schedules so that the authority may effectively implement the plan. Nothing in this section should be interpreted to prevent the authority from pledging authority-wide tax revenues for payment of any contract or debt.
     (5) Plan, develop, and enforce standards for the coordination of public transportation services in the region as set forth in section 204 of this act;
     (6) Plan, develop, and enforce standards for the coordination of regional traffic operations in the region as set forth in section 205 of this act;
     (7) Approve in total, or disapprove all or certain elements of the regional transportation investment plan submitted to it by the policy advisory committee;
     (8) Effective January 1, 2008, assume the role as governing authority for any regional transportation investment district under chapter 36.120 RCW located within the boundaries of the region;
     (9) Effective January 1, 2008, assume the role as governing authority for any regional transit authority under chapter 81.112 RCW located within the boundaries of the region;
     (10) Effective January 1, 2008, assume the role as governing authority for the city transportation authorities in the Puget Sound;
     (11) Appoint any other advisory committees it deems necessary to carry out the intent of this chapter.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 202   AUTHORITY POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE. (1) The council shall appoint an authority policy advisory committee, to be made up of local elected officials, officials of agencies that administer or operate major modes or systems of transportation, appropriate state officials, and other persons as determined by the council.
     (2) After appointment a vote of both a majority of the policy advisory committee and a majority of all councilors may change the composition of the committee at any time.
     (3) The policy advisory committee shall perform the duties assigned to it in this chapter and any other duties the council prescribes.
     (4) The policy advisory committee shall adopt bylaws governing the conduct and recording of its meetings and the terms of its members.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 203   ADVISORY COMMITTEE DUTIES. The policy advisory committee shall:
     (1) Provide a forum for representatives from local and state units of government to assess transportation policies and programs throughout the region, evaluate transportation needs, and to make recommendations to the council;
     (2) Develop a recommended regional plan and a regional transportation investment plan, to be forwarded to the council for approval or rejection;
     (3) Develop and recommend to the council the allocation of federal funds available to the region;
     (4) Review public agencies' plans for consistency under sections 204 and 205 of this act and make recommendations to the council.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 204   PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION COORDINATION. (1) The council shall develop standards for (a) the coordination of capital investment, (b) service, (c) service coordination of public transportation providers in the region, and (d) performance. The goal of these standards is to maximize coordination within and among systems, use resources more effectively, and enhance services to the public. In developing these standards, the council shall consult with regional transit authorities, city transportation authorities, other transit and transportation agencies, and ferry providers operating within the region. The standards must also address vanpool coordination, fare policies, and transportation demand management programs.
     (2) In addition to the duties under section 201 of this act, the council shall approve each plan prepared under RCW 35.58.2795 by public transportation providers operating in the region, if it finds that those plans meet the standards developed under subsection (1) of this section. If the council finds that those plans do not meet the standards set forth in subsection (1) of this section, it shall immediately notify the agency that prepared the plan of the reasons for noncompliance. The plan may be amended and resubmitted to the council.
     (3) If the council does not approve the plan of a public transportation provider operating in its area of jurisdiction, that agency's plan may not be included in the regional transportation investment plan.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 205   REGIONAL TRAFFIC OPERATIONS COORDINATION. (1) The council shall develop standards for the coordination of the traffic operations of state and local roads of regional significance. The objective of these standards is to maximize coordination across jurisdictional boundaries, to invest capital and operational resources more effectively, and to improve transportation system efficiency for the benefit of the traveling public and the movement of goods and services. In developing these standards the council shall consult with the state department of transportation and local traffic operations agencies.
     (2) The council shall ensure that elements of the regional transportation investment plan include a regional traffic operations coordination element that meets the standards under subsection (1) of this section. This plan must include the appropriate application of intelligent transportation systems technologies to the freeways and regional arterials, coordination of signal timing on regional arterials, and the coordination of operating policies on freeways and regional arterials to ensure that the system of freeways and regional arterials operates as an integrated network.

PART III
TECHNICAL MATTERS

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 301   TERM OF OFFICE. The term of office of an officer elected at a general election begins the first Monday of the year after election and continues until a successor assumes the office.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 302   QUALIFICATIONS AND SALARIES OF ELECTED OFFICERS. (1) Councilor. A councilor must be a qualified elector under the Constitution of this state when his or her term of office begins and must have resided during the preceding twelve months in the district from which elected or appointed. When the boundaries of that district have been apportioned or reapportioned during that period, residency in that district for purposes of this subsection includes residency in any former district with area in the district from which the councilor is elected or appointed if residency is established in the apportioned or reapportioned district within sixty days after the apportionment or reapportionment is effective.
     (2) Council president and auditor. The council president and auditor must each be a qualified elector under the Constitution of this state when his or her term of office begins and each must have resided during the preceding twelve months within the boundaries of the authority as they existed when the term of office began. At the time of election or appointment, the auditor must also hold the designation of certified public accountant or certified internal auditor.
     (3) Multiple elected offices. An authority elected officer may not be an elected officer of the state or a city, county, or special district during his or her term of office. As used in this chapter, special district does not include school districts.
     (4) Judging elections and qualifications. The council is the judge of the election and qualification of its members.
     (5) Oath. Before assuming office an elected officer shall take an oath or affirm that he or she will faithfully perform the duties of the office and support the constitutions and laws of the United States and this state and the charter and laws of the authority.
     (6) The salary of the council president will be equal to the salary of members of the county legislative authority of the largest county within the authority. The salary of each other councilor will be two-thirds of the salary of the president. The salary of the auditor will be eighty percent of the salary of the president.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 303   VACANCIES IN OFFICE. (1) Councilor. The office of councilor becomes vacant upon the incumbent's: (a) Death; (b) adjudicated incompetency; (c) recall from office; (d) failure after election or appointment to qualify for the office within ten days after the time for his or her term of office to begin; (e) absence from all meetings of the council within a sixty-day period without the council's consent; (f) ceasing to reside in the district from which elected or appointed, except when district boundaries are reapportioned and a councilor is assigned to a district where the councilor does not reside and the councilor becomes a resident of the reapportioned district within sixty days after the reapportionment is effective; (g) ceasing to be a qualified elector under state law; (h) conviction of a felony or conviction of a federal or state offense punishable by loss of liberty and pertaining to his or her office; (i) resignation from office; or (j) becoming an elected officer of the state or a city, county, or special district.
     (2) Council president and auditor. The offices of council president or auditor become vacant in the circumstances described in subsection (1)(a) through (d) and (g) through (j) of this section, or if the council president or auditor ceases to reside in the area. The office of auditor also becomes vacant if the incumbent ceases to hold the designation of certified public accountant or certified internal auditor.
     (3) Determination of vacancy. The council is the final judge of the existence of a vacancy.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 304   FILLING VACANCIES. A majority of councilors holding office shall fill a vacancy by appointment within ninety days after it occurs. The term of office of the appointee runs from the time he or she qualifies for the office after appointment until a successor is duly elected and qualifies for the office. If the vacancy occurs more than twenty days before the first general election after the beginning of the term for that office, the term of office of the appointee runs only until the first council meeting in the year immediately after that election. A person will be nominated and elected for the remainder of the term at the first primary and general election after the beginning of the term.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 305   LIMITATIONS OF TERMS OF OFFICE. No person may be elected councilor for more than three consecutive full terms, not including any term or terms as council president. No person may be elected council president for more than two consecutive full terms.

PART IV
SYSTEMWIDE PRICING

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 401   A new section is added to chapter 36.-- RCW (sections 101 through 305 of this act) to read as follows:
     SYSTEMWIDE PRICING. A regional transportation system authority may adopt systemwide pricing policies and an implementation plan for the regional transportation system within its boundaries. "Systemwide pricing" includes the tolling authority provided in RCW 36.120.050, network value-pricing authority provided in section 402 of this act, the authority to set regional transit fares as provided in RCW 81.112.080(4), and other system pricing tools as determined by the authority. Systemwide pricing charges authorized by this act may be imposed to improve performance of the regional transportation system, improve integration of transportation modes, finance transportation improvements, and measure needed investments. Pricing charges may vary for type of vehicle, time of day, traffic conditions, and other factors.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 402   A new section is added to chapter 82.80 RCW to read as follows:
     NETWORK VALUE PRICING SYSTEM. (1) A regional transportation investment district or a regional transportation system authority council may impose a network value-pricing charge based upon vehicle travel. This charge may be, but is not limited to, a charge upon the vehicle miles traveled within the district or authority by a vehicle, or upon vehicle miles traveled within certain corridors in the district or authority, or upon total vehicle miles traveled by a vehicle registered to a person whose legal residence is within the district or authority. Network value pricing charges imposed may vary for type of vehicle, time of day, traffic conditions, and other factors.
     (2) Charges imposed may be collected either periodically in a manner prescribed by the district governing board or authority council or annually by the department of licensing upon renewal of the vehicle license. The district governing board or authority council may identify categories of miles driven that are subject to or exempt from the charge, including but not limited to, travel outside the district or authority, travel in specified corridors, time of travel, or exempt or maximum mileage charges.
     (3) The mileage charge under this section is subject to the approval of the transportation commission or its statutory successor.
     (4) A district governing board or an authority council imposing a mileage charge collected annually by the department of licensing upon renewal of the vehicle license shall enter into a contract with the department of licensing. The contract must contain provisions that fully recover the costs to the department of licensing for collection and administration of the charge. The district governing board or authority council imposing this charge or initiating an exemption process shall provide at least six months' notice to the department of licensing before the implementation of any changes in registration amounts or exemptions.

Sec. 403   RCW 47.56.076 and 2005 c 335 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:
     COMMISSION--TOLLING. ((Upon approval of a majority of the voters within its boundaries voting on the ballot proposition, and only for the purposes authorized in RCW 36.120.050(1)(g))) With the approval of the transportation commission, or its successor, a regional transportation investment district or regional transportation system authority may authorize and set vehicle tolls on a state ((routes where improvements financed in whole or in part by a regional transportation investment district add additional lanes to, or reconstruct lanes on, a highway of statewide significance)) or federal highway within the boundaries of the district or authority. The department shall administer the collection of vehicle tolls authorized on designated facilities unless otherwise specified in law or by contract, and the state transportation commission, or its successor, shall ((be the tolling authority)) set and impose the tolls in amounts sufficient to implement the regional transportation investment plan under section 201 of this act.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 404   A new section is added to chapter 47.56 RCW to read as follows:
     I-90/SR 520 TOLLING. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this chapter, a regional transportation investment district or a regional transportation system authority may impose vehicle tolls on either Lake Washington bridge within its boundaries and to implement a regional transportation investment plan as authorized in chapter 36.--RCW (sections 101 through 305 of this act) and RCW 47.56.076.

Sec. 405   RCW 36.120.050 and 2003 c 350 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) A regional transportation investment district planning committee may, as part of a regional transportation investment plan, recommend the imposition of some or all of the following revenue sources, which a regional transportation investment district may impose upon approval of the voters as provided in this chapter:
     (a) A regional sales and use tax, as specified in RCW 82.14.430, of up to 0.5 percent of the selling price, in the case of a sales tax, or value of the article used, in the case of a use tax, upon the occurrence of any taxable event in the regional transportation investment district. This tax is intended to be temporary in nature to supplement district revenues until implementation of some or all of the systemwide pricing plan required by this act. This tax may not be authorized for a period in excess of ten years and may be extended for a period up to ten years with an affirmative vote of the voters in the district;
     (b) A local option vehicle license fee, as specified under RCW 82.80.100, of up to one hundred dollars per vehicle registered in the district. As used in this subsection, "vehicle" means motor vehicle as defined in RCW 46.04.320. Certain classes of vehicles, as defined under chapter 46.04 RCW, may be exempted from this fee;
     (c) A parking tax under RCW 82.80.030;
     (d) A local motor vehicle excise tax under RCW 81.100.060 and chapter 81.104 RCW;
     (e) A local option fuel tax under RCW 82.80.120;
     (f) An employer excise tax under RCW 81.100.030; ((and))
     (g) Vehicle tolls on new or reconstructed ((facilities.)) local or regional arterials or state or federal highways within the boundaries of the district, if the following conditions are met:
     (i) Any such toll must be approved by the transportation commission, or its successor;
     (ii) The regional transportation investment plan must identify the facilities that may be tolled; and
     (iii)
Unless otherwise specified by law or contract, the department shall administer the collection of vehicle tolls on designated facilities, and the state transportation commission, or its successor, shall be the tolling authority;
     (h) A network value pricing charge based on vehicle travel for users of transportation facilities in the district as set forth in section 402 of this act as approved by the transportation commission or its successor entity; and
     (i) A sales and use tax as set forth in section 407 of this act
.
     (2) Taxes, fees, ((and)) tolls, and charges may not be imposed without an affirmative vote of the majority of the voters within the boundaries of the district voting on a ballot proposition as set forth in RCW 36.120.070. Revenues from these taxes and fees may be used only to implement the plan as set forth in this chapter. A district may contract with the state department of revenue or other appropriate entities for administration and collection of any of the taxes ((or)), fees, tolls, or charges authorized in this section.
     (3) Existing statewide motor vehicle fuel and special fuel taxes, at the distribution rates in effect on January 1, 2001, are not intended to be altered by this chapter.

Sec. 406   RCW 36.120.130 and 2003 c 372 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1)(a) Notwithstanding RCW 39.36.020(1), the district may at any time contract indebtedness or borrow money for district purposes and may issue general obligation bonds or other evidences of indebtedness, secured by the pledge of one or more of the taxes, tolls, charges, or fees authorized to be imposed by the district, in an amount not exceeding, together with any existing indebtedness of the district not authorized by the voters, one and one-half percent of the value of the taxable property within the boundaries of the district.
     (b) With the assent of three-fifths of the voters voting at an election, a district may contract indebtedness or borrow money for district purposes and may issue general obligation bonds or other evidences of indebtedness as long as the total indebtedness of the district does not exceed five percent of the value of the taxable property within the district, including indebtedness authorized under (a) of this subsection. The bonds shall be issued and sold in accordance with chapter 39.46 RCW.
     (2) The district may at any time issue revenue bonds or other evidences of indebtedness, secured by the pledge of one or more of the revenues authorized to be collected by the district, to provide funds to carry out its authorized functions without submitting the matter to the voters of the district. These obligations shall be issued and sold in accordance with chapter 39.46 RCW.
     (3) The district may enter into agreements with the lead agencies or the state of Washington, when authorized by the plan, to pledge taxes or other revenues of the district for the purpose of paying in part or whole principal and interest on bonds issued by the lead agency or the state of Washington. The agreements pledging revenues and taxes shall be binding for their terms, but not to exceed thirty years, and no tax pledged by an agreement may be eliminated or modified if it would impair the pledge made in any agreement.
     (4) It is the intent of the legislature that the regional transportation investment plan developed by the district minimize its reliance on bonds and that the district rely to the extent possible on revenues and charges generated by the systemwide pricing system. The issuance of bonds is authorized to address critical transportation expenditures and to better manage the revenues and expenditure commitments of the district.
     (5)
Once construction of projects in the plan has been completed, revenues collected by the district may only be used for the following purposes: (a) Payment of principal and interest on outstanding indebtedness of the district; (b) to make payments required under a pledging agreement; and (c) to make payments for maintenance and operations of toll facilities as may be required by toll bond covenants.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 407   A new section is added to chapter 82.14 RCW to read as follows:
     If approved by the majority of the voters within its boundaries voting on the ballot proposition, a regional transportation investment district may impose a sales and use tax. The tax authorized in this section shall be in addition to any other taxes authorized by law and shall be collected from those persons who are taxable by the state under chapters 82.08 and 82.12 RCW. The rate of the tax shall be the percentage difference between the sales and use tax imposed for public transportation systems, under RCW 82.14.045, in the affected area and the maximum authorized sales and use tax. The tax authorized in this section shall not be imposed for more than ten years.

PART V
2006 JOINT PLAN--RTID AND RTA

Sec. 501   RCW 36.120.020 and 2002 c 56 s 102 are each amended to read as follows:
     The definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
     (1) "Board" means the governing body of a regional transportation investment district.
     (2) "Department" means the Washington state department of transportation.
     (3) "Highway of statewide significance" means an existing or proposed state route or federal interstate designated as a highway of statewide significance by the transportation commission, its successor entity, or the legislature.
     (4) "Lead agency" means a public agency that by law can plan, design, and build a transportation project and has been so designated by the district.
     (5) "Regional transportation investment district" or "district" means a municipal corporation whose boundaries are coextensive with two or more contiguous counties and that has been created by county legislative authorities and a vote of the people under this chapter to implement a regional transportation investment plan.
     (6) "Regional transportation investment district planning committee" or "planning committee" means the advisory committee created under RCW 36.120.030 to create and propose to county legislative authorities a regional transportation investment plan to develop, finance, and construct transportation projects.
     (7) "Regional transportation investment plan" or "plan" means a plan ((to develop, construct, and finance a)), developed jointly with the regional transit authority, to improve transportation system performance through the development, construction, and financing of transportation ((project or)) projects.
     (8) "Transportation project" means:
     (a) A capital improvement or improvements to a highway that has been designated, in whole or in part, as a highway of statewide significance, including an extension, that:
     (i) Adds a lane or new lanes to an existing state or federal highway; or
     (ii) Repairs or replaces a lane or lanes damaged by an event declared an emergency by the governor before January 1, 2002.
     (b) A capital improvement or improvements to all or a portion of a highway of statewide significance, including an extension, and may include the following associated multimodal capital improvements:
     (i) Approaches to highways of statewide significance;
     (ii) High-occupancy vehicle lanes;
     (iii) Flyover ramps;
     (iv) Park and ride lots;
     (v) Bus pullouts;
     (vi) Vans for vanpools;
     (vii) Buses; and
     (viii) Signalization, ramp metering, and other transportation system management improvements.
     (c) A capital improvement or improvements to all or a portion of a city street, county road, or existing highway or the creation of a new highway that intersects with a highway of statewide significance, if all of the following conditions are met:
     (i) The project is included in a plan that makes highway improvement projects that add capacity to a highway or highways of statewide significance;
     (ii) The secretary of transportation determines that the project would better relieve traffic congestion than investing that same money in adding capacity to a highway of statewide significance;
     (iii) Matching money equal to one-third of the total cost of the project is provided by local entities, including but not limited to a metropolitan planning organization, county, city, port, or private entity in which a county participating in a plan is located. Local entities may use federal grants to meet this matching requirement;
     (iv) In no case may the cumulative regional transportation investment district contribution to all projects constructed under this subsection (8)(c) exceed ten percent of the revenues generated by the district;
     (v) In no case may the cumulative regional transportation investment district contribution to all projects constructed under this subsection (8)(c) exceed one billion dollars; and
     (vi) The specific projects are included within the plan and submitted as part of the plan to a vote of the people.
     (d) Operations, preservation, and maintenance are excluded from this definition and may not be included in a regional transportation investment plan. However, operations, preservation, and maintenance of toll-related facilities where toll revenues have been pledged for the payment of contracts is expressly authorized and may be included in a regional transportation investment plan.
     (9) "Weighted vote" means a vote that reflects the population each board or planning committee member represents relative to the population represented by the total membership of the board or planning committee. Population will be determined using the federal 2000 census or subsequent federal census data.

Sec. 502   RCW 36.120.030 and 2002 c 56 s 103 are each amended to read as follows:
     Regional transportation investment district planning committees are advisory entities that are created, convened, and empowered as follows:
     (1) A county with a population over one million five hundred thousand persons and any adjoining counties with a population over five hundred thousand persons may create a regional transportation investment district and shall convene a regional transportation investment district planning committee.
     (a) The boundaries of the district should include at least the contiguous areas within the regional transit authority serving the counties. A city must be entirely within or entirely outside district boundaries. The boundaries must be proposed by the district and approved by the county legislative authorities by ordinance before or in conjunction with approval of a regional transportation investment plan. However, any portion of a county that is located on a peninsula may be exempt from a regional transportation investment district in which more than one county is included if the portion of the county located on the peninsula is connected to the other portion of the county by a bridge improved under the public-private transportation initiatives act, chapter 47.46 RCW, and the county has a national park and a population of more than five hundred thousand persons, but less than one million five hundred thousand persons.
     (b) After voters within the district boundaries have approved a plan under section 507 of this act, elections to add areas to the district boundaries may be called by a resolution of the board, after consultation with the regional transportation planning organization and affected transit agencies and with the concurrence of the legislative authority of the city or town if the area is incorporated or with the concurrence of the county legislative authority if the area is unincorporated. The election may include a single ballot measure providing annexation to the district, approval of the plan, and approval of revenue sources necessary to finance the plan. The electorate will be the voters voting within the proposed area to be annexed. A simple majority of the persons voting on the single ballot measure is required for approval of the measure. This option for annexation applies to areas within the counties initially establishing a district and also to areas within a county having a population over two hundred thirty thousand persons and whose boundaries abut three counties eligible to form a district under this subsection.

     (2) The members of the legislative authorities participating in planning under this chapter shall serve as the district planning committee. Members of the planning committee receive no compensation, but may be reimbursed for travel and incidental expenses as the planning committee deems appropriate.
     The secretary of transportation, or the appropriate regional administrator of the department, as named by the secretary, shall serve on the committee as a nonvoting member.
     (3) A regional transportation investment district planning committee may be entitled to state funding, as appropriated by the legislature, for start-up funding to pay for salaries, expenses, overhead, supplies, and similar expenses ordinarily and necessarily incurred in selecting transportation projects and funding for those transportation projects under this chapter. Upon creation of a regional transportation investment district, the district shall within one year reimburse the state for any sums advanced for these start-up costs from the state.
     (4) The planning committee shall conduct its affairs and formulate a regional transportation investment plan as provided under RCW 36.120.040, except that it shall elect an executive board of seven members to discharge the duties of the planning committee and formulate a regional transportation investment plan, subject to the approval of the full committee.
     (5) At its first meeting, a regional transportation investment district planning committee may elect officers and provide for the adoption of rules and other operating procedures.
     (6) Governance of and decisions by a regional transportation investment district planning committee must be by a sixty-percent weighted majority vote of the total membership.
     (7) The planning committee may dissolve itself at any time by a two-thirds weighted majority vote of the total membership of the planning committee.

Sec. 503   RCW 36.120.040 and 2003 c 194 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) A regional transportation investment district planning committee shall adopt a regional transportation investment plan providing for the development, construction, and financing of transportation projects. The planning committee may consider the following factors in formulating its plan:
     (a) Land use planning criteria;
     (b) The input of cities located within a participating county; and
     (c) The input of regional transportation planning organizations in which a participating county is located. A regional transportation planning organization in which a participating county is located shall review its adopted regional transportation plan and submit, for the planning committee's consideration, its list of transportation improvement priorities.
     (2) The planning committee may coordinate its activities with the department, which shall provide services, data, and personnel to assist in this planning as desired by the planning committee. In addition, the planning committee may coordinate with affected cities, towns, and other local governments that engage in transportation planning.
     (3) The planning committee shall:
     (a) Coordinate its activities with the regional transit authority within the district boundaries and shall recommend a joint plan that improves system performance, through a combination of investments in transit, operations, and transportation projects as defined in RCW 36.120.020, and multimodal projects;
     (b)
Conduct public meetings that are needed to assure active public participation in the development of the plan;
     (((b))) (c) Adopt a plan, jointly with the regional transit authority, proposing the:
     (i) Creation of a regional transportation investment district; and
     (ii) Construction of transportation projects to improve mobility within ((each county)) the district. Operations, maintenance, and preservation of facilities or systems may not be part of the plan;
     (((c))) (d) Recommend sources of revenue authorized by RCW 36.120.050 and a financing plan to fund selected transportation projects. The overall plan of the district must leverage the district's financial contributions so that the federal, state, local, and other revenue sources continue to fund major congestion relief and transportation capacity improvement projects in each county and the district. A combination of local, state, and federal revenues may be necessary to pay for transportation projects, and the planning committee shall consider all of these revenue sources in developing a plan.
     (4) The plan, adopted by the planning committee jointly with the regional transit authority, must use tax revenues and related debt for projects that generally provide network benefits to a participating county or subarea in proportion to the general level of tax revenues generated within that participating county or subarea. This geographic equity principle applies to the overall investment plan and not within investments in specific modes of transportation in the plan. This equity principle applies to all modifications to the plan, appropriation of contingency funds not identified within the project estimate, and future phases of the plan. During implementation of the plan, the board shall retain the flexibility to manage distribution of revenues, debt, and project schedules so that the district may effectively implement the plan. Nothing in this section should be interpreted to prevent the district from pledging district-wide tax revenues for payment of any contract or debt entered into under RCW 36.120.130.
     (5) Before adopting the plan, the planning committee, with assistance from the department, shall work with the lead agency and the regional transit authority to develop accurate cost forecasts for transportation projects. This project costing methodology must be integrated with revenue forecasts in developing the plan and must at a minimum include estimated project costs in constant dollars as well as year of expenditure dollars, the range of project costs reflected by the level of project design, project contingencies, identification of mitigation costs, the range of revenue forecasts, and project and plan cash flow and bond analysis. ((The)) A plan submitted to the voters must provide cost estimates for each project, including reasonable contingency costs. Plans submitted to the voters must provide that the maximum amount possible of the funds raised will be used to fund projects in the plan, including environmental improvements and mitigation, and that administrative costs be minimized. If actual revenue exceeds actual plan costs, the excess revenues must be used to retire any outstanding debt associated with the plan.
     (6) If a county opts not to adopt the plan or participate in the regional transportation investment district, but two or more contiguous counties do choose to continue to participate, then the planning committee may, within ninety days, redefine the regional transportation investment plan and the ballot measure to be submitted to the people to reflect elimination of the county, and submit the redefined plan to the legislative authorities of the remaining counties for their decision as to whether to continue to adopt the redefined plan and participate. This action must be completed within sixty days after receipt of the redefined plan.
     (7) Once adopted, the plan must be forwarded to the participating county legislative authorities to initiate the election process under RCW 36.120.070. The planning committee shall at the same time provide notice to each city and town within the district, the governor, the chairs of the transportation committees of the legislature, the secretary of transportation, and each legislator whose legislative district is partially or wholly within the boundaries of the district.
     (8) If the ballot measure is not approved, the planning committee may redefine the selected transportation projects, financing plan, and the ballot measure. The county legislative authorities may approve the new plan and ballot measure, and may then submit the revised proposition to the voters at the next election or a special election. If no ballot measure is approved by the voters by the third vote, the planning committee is dissolved.

Sec. 504   RCW 36.120.070 and 2002 c 56 s 107 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) Prior to the establishment of a regional transportation system authority, two or more contiguous county legislative authorities, upon receipt of the regional transportation investment plan under RCW 36.120.040, may certify the plan, developed jointly with the regional transit authority, to the ballot, including identification of the tax options necessary to fund the plan. Each of the county legislative authorities shall act within ninety days to adopt or not adopt an ordinance for the county to participate in the plan. However, after a regional transportation system authority is established, action by county legislative authorities to adopt or not adopt an ordinance for participation in the plan is not required.
     (2)
County legislative authorities may draft a ballot title, give notice as required by law for ballot measures, and perform other duties as required to put the plan before the voters of the proposed district for their approval or rejection as a single ballot measure that both approves formation of the district and approves the plan. Counties may negotiate interlocal agreements necessary to implement the plan. The electorate will be the voters voting within the boundaries of the participating counties. A simple majority of the total persons voting on the single ballot measure to approve the plan, establish the district, and approve the taxes and fees is required for approval.

Sec. 505   RCW 36.120.190 and 2002 c 56 s 201 are each amended to read as follows:
     ((At the option of the planning committee, and with the explicit approval of the regional transit authority, the participating counties may choose to impose any remaining high capacity transportation taxes under chapter 81.104 RCW that have not otherwise been used by a regional transit authority and submit to the voters a common ballot measure that creates the district, approves the regional transportation investment plan, implements the taxes, and implements any remaining high capacity transportation taxes within the boundaries of the regional transportation investment district.)) Collection and expenditures of any high-capacity transportation taxes implemented under ((this)) section 507 of this act must be determined by agreement between the participating counties or district and the regional transit authority electing to submit high-capacity transportation taxes to the voters under a common ballot measure as provided in ((this)) section 507 of this act. If the measure fails, all such unused high-capacity transportation taxes revert back to and remain with the regional transit authority. A project constructed with this funding is not considered a "transportation project" under RCW 36.120.020.

Sec. 506   RCW 81.112.030 and 1994 c 44 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
     Two or more contiguous counties each having a population of four hundred thousand persons or more may establish a regional transit authority to develop and operate a high capacity transportation system as defined in chapter 81.104 RCW.
     The authority shall be formed in the following manner:
     (1) The joint regional policy committee created pursuant to RCW 81.104.040 shall adopt a system and financing plan, including the definition of the service area. This action shall be completed by September 1, 1992, contingent upon satisfactory completion of the planning process defined in RCW 81.104.100. The final system plan shall be adopted no later than June 30, 1993. In addition to the requirements of RCW 81.104.100, the plan for the proposed system shall provide explicitly for a minimum portion of new tax revenues to be allocated to local transit agencies for interim express services. Upon adoption the joint regional policy committee shall immediately transmit the plan to the county legislative authorities within the adopted service area.
     (2) The legislative authorities of the counties within the service area shall decide by resolution whether to participate in the authority. This action shall be completed within forty-five days following receipt of the adopted plan or by August 13, 1993, whichever comes first.
     (3) Each county that chooses to participate in the authority shall appoint its board members as set forth in RCW 81.112.040 and shall submit its list of members to the secretary of the Washington state department of transportation. These actions must be completed within thirty days following each county's decision to participate in the authority.
     (4) The secretary shall call the first meeting of the authority, to be held within thirty days following receipt of the appointments. At its first meeting, the authority shall elect officers and provide for the adoption of rules and other operating procedures.
     (5) The authority is formally constituted at its first meeting and the board shall begin taking steps toward implementation of the system and financing plan adopted by the joint regional policy committee. If the joint regional policy committee fails to adopt a plan by June 30, 1993, the authority shall proceed to do so based on the work completed by that date by the joint regional policy committee. Upon formation of the authority, the joint regional policy committee shall cease to exist. The authority may make minor modifications to the plan as deemed necessary and shall at a minimum review local transit agencies' plans to ensure feeder service/high capacity transit service integration, ensure fare integration, and ensure avoidance of parallel competitive services. The authority shall also conduct a minimum thirty-day public comment period.
     (6) If the authority determines that major modifications to the plan are necessary before the initial ballot proposition is submitted to the voters, the authority may make those modifications with a favorable vote of two-thirds of the entire membership. Any such modification shall be subject to the review process set forth in RCW 81.104.110. The modified plan shall be transmitted to the legislative authorities of the participating counties. The legislative authorities shall have forty-five days following receipt to act by motion or ordinance to confirm or rescind their continued participation in the authority.
     (7) If any county opts to not participate in the authority, but two or more contiguous counties do choose to continue to participate, the authority's board shall be revised accordingly. The authority shall, within forty-five days, redefine the system and financing plan to reflect elimination of one or more counties, and submit the redefined plan to the legislative authorities of the remaining counties for their decision as to whether to continue to participate. This action shall be completed within forty-five days following receipt of the redefined plan.
     (8) The authority shall place on the ballot within two years of the authority's formation, a single ballot proposition to authorize the imposition of taxes to support the implementation of an appropriate phase of the plan within its service area. A simple majority of those voting within the boundaries of the authority is required for approval. If the vote is affirmative, the authority shall begin implementation of the projects identified in the proposition.
     (9) Until January 1, 2008, i
n addition to the system plan requirements contained in RCW 81.104.100(2)(d), the system plan approved by the authority's board before the submittal of a proposition to the voters shall contain an equity element which:
     (a) Identifies revenues anticipated to be generated by corridor and by county within the authority's boundaries;
     (b) Identifies the phasing of construction and operation of high capacity system facilities, services, and benefits in each corridor. Phasing decisions should give priority to jurisdictions which have adopted transit-supportive land use plans; and
     (c) Identifies the degree to which revenues generated within each county will benefit the residents of that county, and identifies when such benefits will accrue.
     ((A simple majority of those voting within the boundaries of the authority is required for approval. If the vote is affirmative, the authority shall begin implementation of the projects identified in the proposition. However, the authority may not submit any authorizing proposition for voter-approved taxes prior to July 1, 1993; nor may the authority issue bonds or form any local improvement district prior to July 1, 1993.
     (9)
)) (10) If the vote on a proposition fails, the board may redefine the proposition, make changes to the authority boundaries, and make corresponding changes to the composition of the board. If the composition of the board is changed, the participating counties shall revise the membership of the board accordingly. The board may then submit the revised proposition or a different proposition to the voters. No single proposition may be submitted to the voters more than twice. ((The authority may place additional propositions on the ballot to impose taxes to support additional phases of plan implementation.))
     If the authority is unable to achieve a positive vote on a proposition within two years from the date of the first election on a proposition, the board may, by resolution, reconstitute the authority as a single-county body. With a two-thirds vote of the entire membership of the voting members, the board may also dissolve the authority.
     (11) The authority may place additional propositions on the ballot to impose taxes to support additional phases of plan implementation, if the regional transit authority coordinates its activities with the regional transportation investment district and recommends a joint plan that improves system performance, through a combination of investments in transit, operations, and transportation projects as defined in RCW 36.120.020, and multimodal projects. In a joint plan with a regional transportation investment district the system plan shall be consistent with the equity principle in RCW 36.120.040(4).

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 507   (1) The counties within the authority identified in section 103 of this act may submit to the voters within the authority, at the 2006 general election, a single ballot measure that:
     (a) Approves a joint regional transportation investment plan, as approved by the county legislative authorities and recommended by the planning committee of the regional transportation investment district working jointly with the regional transit authority;
     (b) Approves the revenue sources necessary to finance the joint plan, including:
     (i) All or part of the remaining high-capacity transportation taxes within the boundaries of the regional transportation investment district, as recommended by the executive board of the regional transportation authority; and
     (ii) Revenue sources recommended by the planning committee of the regional transportation investment district; and
     (c) Approves formation of the regional transportation system authority, authorizes establishment of the authority council, and approves the powers of the council as set forth in this act.
     (2) If a regional transportation investment plan is not approved by the county councils, the counties identified in section 103 of this act shall submit to the voters within the authority, at the 2006 general election, a ballot measure that approves formation of the regional transportation system authority, authorizes establishment of the authority council, and approves the powers of the council as set forth in this act.
     (3) The auditors of those counties shall transmit the results of the election to the secretary of state in the manner described in RCW 29A.60.230 for canvassing by the secretary in the manner described by RCW 29A.60.260. A simple majority of the persons voting on the single ballot measure is required for the authority to be established.

PART VI
AMENDMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS SECTIONS

Sec. 601   RCW 35.58.2795 and 1994 c 158 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) As used in this section "agency" means a municipality as defined in RCW 35.58.272 and a regional transit authority, and within an authority as defined in section 102 of this act it means a public transportation provider as defined in section 102 of this act.
     (2)
By April 1st of each year, the legislative authority of each ((municipality, as defined in RCW 35.58.272, and each regional transit authority)) agency shall prepare a six-year transit development plan for that calendar year and the ensuing five years. Agencies located in the central Puget Sound regional transportation system authority shall provide resources to the Puget Sound regional transportation system authority council to prepare elements of those plans identified by that council. The program shall be consistent with the comprehensive plans adopted by counties, cities, and towns, pursuant to chapter 35.63, 35A.63, or 36.70 RCW, the inherent authority of a first class city or charter county derived from its charter, or chapter 36.70A RCW. The program shall contain information as to how the municipality intends to meet state and local long-range priorities for public transportation, capital improvements, significant operating changes planned for the system, coordinate services with other agencies, and how the ((municipality)) agency intends to fund program needs. The six-year plan for each ((municipality and regional transit authority shall)) agency must specifically set forth those projects of regional significance for inclusion in the transportation ((improvement program)) investment plan within that region. For those agencies located within the jurisdiction of the Puget Sound regional transportation system authority, the plan must address the standards developed under sections 204 and 205 of this act for inclusion in the transportation investment plan in that region. Each ((municipality and regional transit authority)) agency shall file the six-year program with the state department of transportation, the transportation improvement board, and cities, counties, and regional planning councils within which the municipality is located.
     In developing its program, the ((municipality and the regional transit authority)) agency shall consider those policy recommendations affecting public transportation contained in the state transportation policy plan approved by the state transportation commission and, where appropriate, adopted by the legislature. The ((municipality)) agency shall conduct one or more public hearings while developing its program and for each annual update.

Sec. 602   RCW 35.95A.030 and 2002 c 248 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) A city that undertakes to propose creation of an authority must propose the authority by ordinance of the city legislative body. The ordinance must:
     (a) Propose the authority area and the size and method of selection of the governing body of the authority, which governing body may be appointed or elected, provided that officers or employees of any single city government body may not compose a majority of the members of the authority's governing body;
     (b) Propose whether all or a specified portion of the public monorail transportation function will be exercised by the authority;
     (c) Propose an initial array of taxes to be voted upon by the electors within the proposed authority area; and
     (d) Provide for an interim governing body of the authority which will govern the authority upon voter approval of formation of the authority, until a permanent governing body is selected, but in no event longer than fourteen months.
     (2) An authority may also be proposed to be created by a petition setting forth the matters described in subsection (1) of this section, and signed by one percent of the qualified electors of the proposed authority area.
     (3) Upon approval by the qualified electors of the formation of the city transportation authority and any proposed taxes, either by ordinance or by petition as provided in this chapter, the governing body of an authority, or interim governing body, as applicable, will adopt bylaws determining, among other things, the authority's officers and the method of their selection, and other matters the governing body deems appropriate.
     (4) Effective January 1, 2008, for a city transportation authority located within a regional transportation investment district, the Puget Sound regional transportation district council is the governing board. For votes of the council regarding board decisions, the vote of each councilor, including the president, is weighted to reflect that portion of the city transportation authority population that is within each councilor district.

Sec. 603   RCW 35.95A.070 and 2002 c 248 s 8 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) Until January 1, 2008, except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, every authority has the power to:
     (((1))) (a) Levy excess levies upon the property included within the authority area, in the manner prescribed by Article VII, section 2 of the state Constitution and by RCW 84.52.052 for operating funds, capital outlay funds, and cumulative reserve funds;
     (((2))) (b) Issue general obligation bonds, not to exceed an amount, together with any outstanding nonvoter-approved general obligation indebtedness equal to one and one-half percent of the value of the taxable property within the authority area, as the term "value of the taxable property" is defined in RCW 39.36.015. An authority may additionally issue general obligation bonds, together with outstanding voter-approved and nonvoter-approved general obligation indebtedness, equal to two and one-half percent of the value of the taxable property within the authority area, as the term "value of the taxable property" is defined in RCW 39.36.015, when the bonds are approved by three-fifths of the qualified electors of the authority at a general or special election called for that purpose and may provide for the retirement thereof by levies in excess of dollar rate limitations in accordance with the provisions of RCW 84.52.056. These elections will be held as provided in RCW 39.36.050;
     (((3))) (c) Issue revenue bonds payable from any revenues other than taxes levied by the authority, and to pledge those revenues for the repayment of the bonds. Proceeds of revenue bonds may only be expended for the costs of public monorail transportation facilities, for financing costs, and for capitalized interest during construction plus six months thereafter. The bonds and warrants will be issued and sold in accordance with chapter 39.46 RCW.
     No bonds issued by an authority are obligations of any city, county, or the state of Washington or any political subdivision thereof other than the authority, and the bonds will so state, unless the legislative authority of any city or county or the legislature expressly authorizes particular bonds to be either guaranteed by or obligations of its respective city or county or of the state.
     (2) An authority may continue to impose a levy in accordance with RCW 84.52.056 or collect the revenue from a levy imposed pursuant to RCW 84.52.052, after January 1, 2008, if the election for the levy or levies occurred before January 1, 2008.

Sec. 604   RCW 35.95A.080 and 2002 c 248 s 9 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) Until January 1, 2008, except as provided in subsection (6) of this section, every authority has the power to levy and collect a special excise tax not exceeding two and one-half percent on the value of every motor vehicle owned by a resident of the authority area for the privilege of using a motor vehicle. Before utilization of any excise tax money collected under this section for acquisition of right of way or construction of a public monorail transportation facility on a separate right of way, the authority must adopt rules affording the public an opportunity for corridor public hearings and design public hearings, which provide in detail the procedures necessary for public participation in the following instances: (a) Prior to adoption of location and design plans having a substantial social, economic, or environmental effect upon the locality upon which they are to be constructed; or (b) on the public transportation facilities operating on a separate right of way whenever a substantial change is proposed relating to location or design in the adopted plan. In adopting rules the authority must adhere to the provisions of the administrative procedure act.
     (2) A "corridor public hearing" is a public hearing that: (a) Is held before the authority is committed to a specific route proposal for the public transportation facility, and before a route location is established; (b) is held to afford an opportunity for participation by those interested in the determination of the need for, and the location of, the public transportation facility; and (c) provides a public forum that affords a full opportunity for presenting views on the public transportation facility route location, and the social, economic, and environmental effects on that location and alternate locations. However, the hearing is not deemed to be necessary before adoption of a transportation plan as provided in section 7 of this act or a vote of the qualified electors under subsection (5) of this section.
     (3) A "design public hearing" is a public hearing that: (a) Is held after the location is established but before the design is adopted; (b) is held to afford an opportunity for participation by those interested in the determination of major design features of the public monorail transportation facility; and (c) provides a public forum to afford a full opportunity for presenting views on the public transportation system design, and the social, economic, and environmental effects of that design and alternate designs, including people-mover technology.
     (4) An authority imposing a tax under subsection (1) of this section may also impose a sales and use tax, in addition to any tax authorized by RCW 82.14.030, upon retail car rentals within the city that are taxable by the state under chapters 82.08 and 82.12 RCW. The rate of tax must not exceed 1.944 percent of the base of the tax. The base of the tax will be the selling price in the case of a sales tax or the rental value of the vehicle used in the case of a use tax. The revenue collected under this subsection will be distributed in the same manner as sales and use taxes under chapter 82.14 RCW.
     (5) Before any authority may impose any of the taxes authorized under this section, the authorization for imposition of the taxes must be approved by the qualified electors of the authority area.
     (6) An authority may continue to impose the taxes authorized in this section after January 1, 2008, to the extent necessary to secure the payment of any bonds or other obligations incurred prior to January 1, 2008.

Sec. 605   RCW 35.95A.090 and 2002 c 248 s 10 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) Until January 1, 2008, except as provided in subsection (5) of this section, every authority has the power to fix and impose a fee, not to exceed one hundred dollars per vehicle, for each vehicle that is subject to relicensing tab fees under RCW 46.16.0621 and for each vehicle that is subject to RCW 46.16.070 with an unladen weight of six thousand pounds or less, and that is determined by the department of licensing to be registered within the boundaries of the authority area. The department of licensing must provide an exemption from the fee for any vehicle the owner of which demonstrates is not operated within the authority area.
     (2) The department of licensing will administer and collect the fee. The department will deduct a percentage amount, as provided by contract, not to exceed two percent of the taxes collected, for administration and collection expenses incurred by it. The remaining proceeds will be remitted to the custody of the state treasurer for monthly distribution to the authority.
     (3) The authority imposing this fee will delay the effective date at least six months from the date the fee is approved by the qualified voters of the authority area to allow the department of licensing to implement administration and collection of the fee.
     (4) Before any authority may impose any of the fees authorized under this section, the authorization for imposition of the fees must be approved by a majority of the qualified electors of the authority area voting.
     (5) An authority may continue to impose the fee authorized in this section after January 1, 2008, to the extent necessary to secure the payment of any bonds or other obligations incurred prior to January 1, 2008.

Sec. 606   RCW 35.95A.100 and 2002 c 248 s 11 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) Until January 1, 2008, except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, every authority has the power to impose annual regular property tax levies in an amount equal to one dollar and fifty cents or less per thousand dollars of assessed value of property in the authority area when specifically authorized to do so by a majority of the voters voting on a proposition submitted at a special election or at the regular election of the authority. A proposition authorizing the tax levies will not be submitted by an authority more than twice in any twelve-month period. Ballot propositions must conform with RCW ((29.30.111)) 29A.36.210. The number of years during which the regular levy will be imposed may be limited as specified in the ballot proposition or may be unlimited in duration. In the event an authority is levying property taxes, which in combination with property taxes levied by other taxing districts subject to the limitations provided in RCW 84.52.043 and 84.52.050, exceed these limitations, the authority's property tax levy shall be reduced or eliminated consistent with RCW 84.52.010.
     (2) The limitation in RCW 84.55.010 does not apply to the first levy imposed under this section following the approval of the levies by the voters under subsection (1) of this section.
     (3)(a) An authority may continue to levy and collect the regular property tax levy authorized in this section after January 1, 2008, only if the levy was approved prior to January 1, 2008, and it is necessary to secure the payment of any bonds or other obligations incurred prior to January 1, 2008.
     (b) Regular property tax levies authorized for collection in 2008 and unnecessary to secure the payment of bonds or other obligations as provided in (a) of this subsection may be collected after January 1, 2008.

Sec. 607   RCW 36.120.090 and 2002 c 56 s 109 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) Initially the governing board of a district consists of the members of the legislative authority of each member county, acting ex officio and independently. The secretary of transportation or the appropriate regional administrator of the department, as named by the secretary, shall also serve as a nonvoting member of the board. The governing board may elect an executive board of seven members to discharge the duties of the governing board subject to the approval of the full governing board.
     (2) Effective January 1, 2008, for a district located within a regional transportation investment district, the Puget Sound regional transportation authority council is the governing board. For votes of the council regarding board decisions, the vote of each councilor, including the president, is weighted to reflect that portion of the regional transportation investment district population that is within each councilor district.
     (3) Until January 1, 2008, a
sixty-percent majority of the weighted votes of the total board membership is required to submit to the counties a modified plan under RCW 36.120.140 or any other proposal to be submitted to the voters. Until January 1, 2008, the counties may, with majority vote of each county legislative authority, submit a modified plan or proposal to the voters.

Sec. 608   RCW 36.120.110 and 2002 c 56 s 111 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) The governing board of the district is responsible for the execution of the voter-approved plan. The board shall:
     (a) Impose taxes and fees authorized by district voters;
     (b) Enter into agreements with state, local, and regional agencies and departments as necessary to accomplish district purposes and protect the district's investment in transportation projects;
     (c) Accept gifts, grants, or other contributions of funds that will support the purposes and programs of the district;
     (d) Monitor and audit the progress and execution of transportation projects to protect the investment of the public and annually make public its findings;
     (e) Pay for services and enter into leases and contracts, including professional service contracts;
     (f) Until January 1, 2008, hire no more than ten employees, including a director or executive officer, a treasurer or financial officer, a project manager or engineer, a project permit coordinator, and clerical staff; and
     (g) Exercise other powers and duties as may be reasonable to carry out the purposes of the district.
     (2) It is the intent of the legislature that existing staff resources of lead agencies be used in implementing this chapter. A district may coordinate its activities with the department, which shall provide services, data, and personnel to assist as desired by the regional transportation investment district. Lead agencies for transportation projects that are not state facilities shall also provide staff support for the board.
     (3) A district may not acquire, hold, or dispose of real property.
     (4) A district may not own, operate, or maintain an ongoing facility, road, or transportation system.
     (5) A district may accept and expend or use gifts, grants, or donations.
     (6) It is the intent of the legislature that administrative and overhead costs of a regional transportation investment district be minimized. For transportation projects costing up to fifty million dollars, administrative and overhead costs may not exceed three percent of the total construction and design project costs per year. For transportation projects costing more than fifty million dollars, administrative and overhead costs may not exceed three percent of the first fifty million dollars in costs, plus an additional one-tenth of one percent of each additional dollar above fifty million. These limitations apply only to the district, and do not limit the administration or expenditures of the department.
     (7) A district may use the design-build procedure for transportation projects developed by it. As used in this section "design-build procedure" means a method of contracting under which the district contracts with another party for that party to both design and build the structures, facilities, and other items specified in the contract. The requirements and limitations of RCW 47.20.780 and 47.20.785 do not apply to the transportation projects under this chapter.

Sec. 609   RCW 36.120.140 and 2003 c 194 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) The board may modify the plan to change transportation projects or revenue sources if:
     (a) Two or more participating counties adopt a resolution to modify the plan; and
     (b) The counties submit to the voters in the district, and after January 1, 2008, the governing board submits, a ballot measure that redefines the scope of the plan, its projects, its schedule, its costs, or the revenue sources. If the voters fail to approve the redefined plan, the district shall continue to work on and complete the plan, and the projects in it, that was originally approved by the voters. If the voters approve the redefined plan, the district shall work on and complete the projects under the redefined plan.
     (2) The board may modify the plan to change transportation projects within a participating county if:
     (a) A majority of the board approves the change;
     (b) The modifications are limited to projects within the county;
     (c) The county submits to the voters in the county a ballot measure that redefines:
     (i) Projects;
     (ii) Scopes of projects; or
     (iii) Costs; and
     (iv) The financial plan for the county;
     (d) The proposed modifications maintain the equity of the plan and ((does [do])) do not increase the total level of plan expenditure for the county.
     If the voters fail to approve the modified plan, the district shall continue to work on and complete the plan, and the projects in it, that was originally approved by the voters. If the voters approve the redefined plan, the district shall work on and complete the projects under the redefined plan.
     (3) If a transportation project cost exceeds its original cost by more than twenty percent as identified in the plan:
     (a) The board shall, in coordination with the county legislative authorities, submit to the voters in the district or county a ballot measure that redefines the scope of the transportation project, its schedule, or its costs. If the voters fail to approve the redefined transportation project, the district shall terminate work on that transportation project, except that the district may take reasonable steps to use, preserve, or connect any improvement already constructed. The remainder of any funds that would otherwise have been expended on the terminated transportation project must first be used to retire any outstanding debt attributable to the plan and then may be used to implement the remainder of the plan.
     (b) Alternatively, upon adoption of a resolution by two or more participating counties:
     (i) The counties shall submit, and after January 1, 2008, the governing board shall submit, to the voters in the district a ballot measure that redefines the scope of the plan, its transportation projects, its schedule, or its costs. If the voters fail to approve the redefined plan, the district shall terminate work on that plan, except that the district may take reasonable steps to use, preserve, or connect any improvement already constructed. The remainder of any funds must be used to retire any outstanding debt attributable to the plan; or
     (ii) Until January 1, 2008, the counties, and after January 1, 2008, the board may elect to have the district continue the transportation project without submitting an additional ballot proposal to the voters.
     (4) To assure accountability to the public for the timely construction of the transportation improvement project or projects within cost projections, the district shall issue a report, at least annually, to the public and copies of the report to newspapers of record in the district. In the report, the district shall indicate the status of transportation project costs, transportation project expenditures, revenues, and construction schedules. The report may also include progress towards meeting the performance criteria provided under this chapter.

Sec. 610   RCW 47.26.080 and 1999 c 94 s 16 are each amended to read as follows:
     There is hereby created in the motor vehicle fund the urban arterial trust account. The intent of the urban arterial trust account program is to improve the arterial street system of the state by improving mobility and safety while supporting an environment essential to the quality of life of the citizens of the state of Washington. The city hardship assistance program, as provided in RCW 47.26.164, and the small city program, as provided for in RCW 47.26.115, are implemented within the urban arterial trust account.
     For funds apportioned to projects in counties in the Puget Sound regional transportation system authority, the board shall give preference to projects that meet the standards established under sections 204 and 205 of this act. The board shall not allocate funds, nor make payments of the funds under RCW 47.26.260, to any county, city, or town identified by the governor under RCW 36.70A.340.

Sec. 611   RCW 47.26.086 and 1994 c 179 s 11 are each amended to read as follows:
     Transportation improvement account projects selected for funding programs after fiscal year 1995 are governed by the requirements of this section.
     The board shall allocate funds from the account by June 30th of each year for the ensuing fiscal year to urban counties, cities with a population of five thousand and over, and to transportation benefit districts. Projects may include, but are not limited to, multi-agency projects and arterial improvement projects in fast-growing areas. The board shall endeavor to provide geographical diversity in selecting improvement projects to be funded from the account.
     The intent of the program is to improve mobility of people and goods in Washington state by supporting economic development and environmentally responsive solutions to our statewide transportation system needs.
     To be eligible to receive these funds, a project must be consistent with the Growth Management Act, the Clean Air Act including conformity, and the Commute Trip Reduction Law and consideration must have been given to the project's relationship, both actual and potential, with the statewide rail passenger program and rapid mass transit. Projects must be consistent with any adopted high capacity transportation plan, must consider existing or reasonably foreseeable congestion levels attributable to economic development or growth and all modes of transportation and safety, and must be partially funded by local government or private contributions, or a combination of such contributions. For projects proposed in counties in the Puget Sound regional transportation system authority, the board shall give preference to projects that meet the standards established under sections 204 and 205 of this act. Priority consideration shall be given to those projects with the greatest percentage of local or private contribution, or both.
     Within one year after board approval of an application for funding, the lead agency shall provide written certification to the board of the pledged local and private funding for the phase of the project approved. Funds allocated to an applicant that does not certify its funding within one year after approval may be reallocated by the board.

Sec. 612   RCW 47.80.020 and 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 s 54 are each amended to read as follows:
     The legislature hereby authorizes creation of regional transportation planning organizations within the state. Each regional transportation planning organization shall be formed through the voluntary association of local governments within a county, or within geographically contiguous counties. Except as provided in section 201 of this act, each organization shall:
     (1) Encompass at least one complete county;
     (2) Have a population of at least one hundred thousand, or contain a minimum of three counties; and
     (3) Have as members all counties within the region, and at least sixty percent of the cities and towns within the region representing a minimum of seventy-five percent of the cities' and towns' population.
     The state department of transportation must verify that each regional transportation planning organization conforms with the requirements of this section.
     In urbanized areas, the regional transportation planning organization is the same as the metropolitan planning organization designated for federal transportation planning purposes.

Sec. 613   RCW 47.80.030 and 2005 c 328 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) Each regional transportation planning organization shall develop in cooperation with the department of transportation, providers of public transportation and high capacity transportation, ports, and local governments within the region, adopt, and periodically update a regional transportation plan that:
     (a) Is based on a least cost planning methodology that identifies the most cost-effective facilities, services, and programs;
     (b) Identifies existing or planned transportation facilities, services, and programs, including but not limited to major roadways including state highways and regional arterials, transit and nonmotorized services and facilities, multimodal and intermodal facilities, marine ports and airports, railroads, and noncapital programs including transportation demand management that should function as an integrated regional transportation system, giving emphasis to those facilities, services, and programs that exhibit one or more of the following characteristics:
     (i) Crosses member county lines;
     (ii) Is or will be used by a significant number of people who live or work outside the county in which the facility, service, or project is located;
     (iii) Significant impacts are expected to be felt in more than one county;
     (iv) Potentially adverse impacts of the facility, service, program, or project can be better avoided or mitigated through adherence to regional policies;
     (v) Transportation needs addressed by a project have been identified by the regional transportation planning process and the remedy is deemed to have regional significance; and
     (vi) Provides for system continuity;
     (c) Establishes level of service standards for state highways and state ferry routes, with the exception of transportation facilities of statewide significance as defined in RCW 47.06.140. These regionally established level of service standards for state highways and state ferries shall be developed jointly with the department of transportation, to encourage consistency across jurisdictions. In establishing level of service standards for state highways and state ferries, consideration shall be given for the necessary balance between providing for the free interjurisdictional movement of people and goods and the needs of local commuters using state facilities;
     (d) Includes a financial plan demonstrating how the regional transportation plan can be implemented, indicating resources from public and private sources that are reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the plan, and recommending any innovative financing techniques to finance needed facilities, services, and programs;
     (e) Assesses regional development patterns, capital investment and other measures necessary to:
     (i) Ensure the preservation of the existing regional transportation system, including requirements for operational improvements, resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation of existing and future major roadways, as well as operations, maintenance, modernization, and rehabilitation of existing and future transit, railroad systems and corridors, and nonmotorized facilities; and
     (ii) Make the most efficient use of existing transportation facilities to relieve vehicular congestion and maximize the mobility of people and goods;
     (f) Sets forth a proposed regional transportation approach, including capital investments, service improvements, programs, and transportation demand management measures to guide the development of the integrated, multimodal regional transportation system. For regional growth centers, the approach must address transportation concurrency strategies required under RCW 36.70A.070 and include a measurement of vehicle level of service for off-peak periods and total multimodal capacity for peak periods; and
     (g) Where appropriate, sets forth the relationship of high capacity transportation providers and other public transit providers with regard to responsibility for, and the coordination between, services and facilities.
     (2) The organization shall review the regional transportation plan biennially for currency and forward the adopted plan along with documentation of the biennial review to the state department of transportation.
     (3) All transportation projects, programs, and transportation demand management measures within the region that have an impact upon regional facilities or services must be consistent with the plan and with the adopted regional growth and transportation strategies.
     (4) In the case of a regional transportation planning organization located in a Puget Sound regional transportation system authority, the plan must be based on the guidelines and plan prepared by the council under section 201 of this act. The plan must include recommendations to the department of transportation regarding levels of service standards for highways of statewide significance.

Sec. 614   RCW 47.80.040 and 2003 c 351 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
     Each regional transportation planning organization other than a Puget Sound regional transportation system authority shall, and a Puget Sound regional transportation system authority may, create a transportation policy board. Transportation policy boards shall provide policy advice to the regional transportation planning organization and shall allow representatives of major employers within the region, the department of transportation, transit districts, port districts, and member cities, towns, and counties within the region to participate in policy making. Any members of the house of representatives or the state senate whose districts are wholly or partly within the boundaries of the regional transportation planning organization or Puget Sound regional transportation district are considered ex officio, nonvoting policy board members of the regional transportation planning organization. This does not preclude legislators from becoming full-time, voting board members.

Sec. 615   RCW 47.80.060 and 2005 c 334 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
     In order to qualify for state planning funds available to regional transportation planning organizations, the regional transportation planning organizations containing any county with a population in excess of one million, other than a Puget Sound regional transportation system authority, shall provide voting membership on its executive board to the state transportation commission, the state department of transportation, and the four largest public port districts within the region as determined by gross operating revenues. It shall further assure that at least fifty percent of the county and city local elected officials who serve on the executive board also serve on transit agency boards or on a regional transit authority.

Sec. 616   RCW 81.112.040 and 1994 c 109 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, the regional transit authority shall be governed by a board consisting of representatives appointed by the county executive and confirmed by the council or other legislative authority of each member county. Membership shall be based on population from that portion of each county which lies within the service area. Board members shall be appointed initially on the basis of one for each one hundred forty-five thousand population within the county. Such appointments shall be made following consultation with city and town jurisdictions within the service area. In addition, the secretary of transportation or the secretary's designee shall serve as a member of the board and may have voting status with approval of a majority of the other members of the board. Only board members, not including alternates or designees, may cast votes.
     Each member of the board, except the secretary of transportation or the secretary's designee, shall be:
     (a) An elected official who serves on the legislative authority of a city or as mayor of a city within the boundaries of the authority;
     (b) On the legislative authority of the county, if fifty percent of the population of the legislative official's district is within the authority boundaries; or
     (c) A county executive from a member county within the authority boundaries.
     When making appointments, each county executive shall ensure that representation on the board includes an elected city official representing the largest city in each county and assures proportional representation from other cities, and representation from unincorporated areas of each county within the service area. At least one-half of all appointees from each county shall serve on the governing authority of a public transportation system.
     Members appointed from each county shall serve staggered four-year terms. Vacancies shall be filled by appointment for the remainder of the unexpired term of the position being vacated.
     The governing board shall be reconstituted, with regard to the number of representatives from each county, on a population basis, using the official office of financial management population estimates, five years after its initial formation and, at minimum, in the year following each official federal census. The board membership may be reduced, maintained, or expanded to reflect population changes but under no circumstances may the board membership exceed twenty-five.
     (2) For a regional transit authority located within a regional transportation system authority, effective January 1, 2008, the Puget Sound regional transportation system authority council is the governing board. For votes of the council regarding board decisions, the vote of each councilor, including the president, is weighted to reflect that portion of the regional transit authority population that is within each councilor district.
     (3)
Major decisions of the authority shall require a favorable vote of two-thirds of the entire membership of the voting members or for a regional transportation system authority council, two-thirds of the weighted votes. "Major decisions" include at least the following: System plan adoption and amendment; system phasing decisions; annual budget adoption; authorization of annexations; modification of board composition; and executive director employment.
     (((3))) (4) Each member of the board is eligible to be reimbursed for travel expenses in accordance with RCW 43.03.050 and 43.03.060 and to receive compensation as provided in RCW 43.03.250.

PART VII
OTHER PROVISIONS

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 701   Captions and part headings used in this act are not part of the law.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 702   Sections 101 through 305 of this act constitute a new chapter in Title 36 RCW.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 703   If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 704   If any part of this act is found to be in conflict with federal requirements that are a prescribed condition to the allocation of federal funds to the state, the conflicting part of this act is inoperative solely to the extent of the conflict and with respect to the agencies directly affected, and this finding does not affect the operation of the remainder of this act in its application to the agencies concerned. Rules adopted under this act must meet federal requirements that are a necessary condition to the receipt of federal funds by the state.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 705   Sections 612 through 615 of this act take effect January 1, 2008, if the authority is formed.

--- END ---