BILL REQ. #: Z-0879.4
State of Washington | 59th Legislature | 2006 Regular Session |
Read first time 01/12/2006. Referred to Committee on State Government Operations & Accountability.
AN ACT Relating to valid voter registrations; amending RCW 29A.08.112, 29A.08.810, 29A.08.820, 29A.08.840, 29A.08.850, and 29A.40.140; and repealing RCW 29A.08.830.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1 RCW 29A.08.112 and 2005 c 246 s 6 are each amended to read
as follows:
No person registering to vote, who meets all the qualifications of
a registered voter in the state of Washington, shall be disqualified
because ((of a nontraditional address being used as a residence
address. Voters using such an)) he or she lacks a traditional
residential address. A voter who lacks a traditional residential
address will be registered and assigned to a precinct based on the
location provided((. Voters without a traditional address will be
registered at the)), and has the option of using the address of a
county courthouse, city hall, or other public building near the area
that the voter considers his or her residence. ((Registering at a
nontraditional address will not disqualify a voter from requesting
ongoing absentee voter status if the voter designates a valid mailing
address.)) A voter who registers under this section
must provide a valid mailing address, and must still meet the
requirement in Article VI, section 1 of the state Constitution that he
or she live in the area for at least thirty days before the election.
For the purposes of this section, "nontraditional address" includes
shelters, parks, or other identifiable locations that the voter deems
to be his or her residence.
A person who has a traditional residential address must use that
address for voter registration purposes and is not eligible to register
under this section.
Sec. 2 RCW 29A.08.810 and 2003 c 111 s 253 are each amended to
read as follows:
(1) Registration of a person as a voter is presumptive evidence of
his or her right to vote ((at any primary or election, general or
special. A person's right to vote may be challenged at the polls only
by a precinct judge or inspector. A challenge may be made only upon
the belief or knowledge of the challenging officer that the voter is
unqualified. The challenge must be supported by evidence or testimony
given to the county canvassing board under RCW 29A.08.820 and may not
be based on unsupported allegations or allegations by anonymous third
parties. The identity of the challenger, and any third person involved
in the challenge, shall be public record and shall be announced at the
time the challenge is made.)). A challenge to the person's right
to vote must be based on personal knowledge of one of the following:
Challenges initiated by a registered voter must be filed not later
than the day before any primary or election, general or special, at the
office of the appropriate county auditor. A challenged voter may
properly transfer or reregister until three days before the primary or
election, general or special, by applying personally to the county
auditor. Challenges may also be initiated by the office of the county
prosecuting attorney and must be filed in the same manner as challenges
initiated by a registered voter
(a) The challenged voter has been convicted of a felony and the
voter's civil rights have not been restored;
(b) The challenged voter has been judicially declared ineligible to
vote due to mental incompetency;
(c)(i) The challenged voter does not live at the residential
address provided, in which case the challenger must provide the
challenged voter's actual residence; or
(ii) The residential address provided does not constitute a
residence;
(d) The challenged voter is not eighteen years of age or older, or
will not be eighteen years of age by the next election; or
(e) The challenged voter is not a citizen of the United States.
(2) A person's right to vote may be challenged: By another
registered voter or the county prosecuting attorney if the challenge is
filed anytime other than election day, or by the poll site judge or
inspector if the challenge is filed on election day.
(3) The challenger must file a signed affidavit subject to the
penalties of perjury swearing that, to his or her personal knowledge
and belief, the challenged voter either is not qualified to vote or
does not reside at the address given on his or her voter registration
record based on one of the reasons allowed in subsection (1) of this
section. The challenger must provide the factual basis for the
challenge in the signed affidavit. The challenge may not be based on
unsupported allegations or allegations by anonymous third parties. All
documents pertaining to the challenge are public records.
Sec. 3 RCW 29A.08.820 and 2003 c 111 s 254 are each amended to
read as follows:
((When the right of a person has been challenged under RCW
29A.08.810 or 29A.08.830(2), the challenged person shall be permitted
to vote a ballot which shall be placed in a sealed envelope separate
from other voted ballots. In precincts where voting machines are used,
any person whose right to vote is challenged under RCW 29A.08.810 or
29A.08.830(2) shall be furnished a paper ballot, which shall be placed
in a sealed envelope after being marked. Included with the challenged
ballot shall be (1) an affidavit filed under RCW 29A.08.830 challenging
the person's right to vote or (2) an affidavit signed by the precinct
election officer and any third party involved in the officer's
challenge and stating the reasons the voter is being challenged. The
sealed ballots of challenged voters shall be transmitted at the close
of the election to the canvassing board or other authority charged by
law with canvassing the returns of the particular primary or election.
The county auditor shall notify the challenger and the challenged
voter, by certified mail, of the time and place at which the county
canvassing board will meet to rule on challenged ballots. If the
challenge is made by a precinct election officer under RCW 29A.08.810,
the officer must appear in person before the board unless he or she has
received written authorization from the canvassing board to submit an
affidavit supporting the challenge. If the challenging officer has
based his or her challenge upon evidence provided by a third party,
that third party must appear with the challenging officer before the
canvassing board, unless he or she has received written authorization
from the canvassing board to submit an affidavit supporting the
challenge. If the challenge is filed under RCW 29A.08.830, the
challenger must either appear in person before the board or submit an
affidavit supporting the challenge. The challenging party must prove
to the canvassing board by clear and convincing evidence that the
challenged voter's registration is improper. If the challenging party
fails to meet this burden, the challenged ballot shall be accepted as
valid and counted. The canvassing board shall give the challenged
voter the opportunity to present testimony, either in person or by
affidavit, and evidence to the canvassing board before making their
determination. All challenged ballots must be determined no later than
the time of canvassing for the particular primary or election. The
decision of the canvassing board or other authority charged by law with
canvassing the returns shall be final. Challenges of absentee ballots
shall be determined according to RCW 29A.40.140.)) (1)(a) If the
challenge is filed within thirty days before an election at which the
challenged voter is eligible to vote, a notation of the challenge must
be made in the poll book or voter registration system, and the county
canvassing board presides over the hearing.
(b) If the challenge is filed before the challenged voter's ballot
is received, the ballot must be treated as a challenged ballot. A
challenged ballot received at a polling place must be placed in a
sealed envelope separate from other voted ballots.
(c) If the challenge is filed after the challenged voter's ballot
is received, the challenge cannot affect the current election.
(2) If the challenge is filed at least thirty days before an
election at which the challenged voter is eligible to vote, the county
auditor presides over the hearing.
Sec. 4 RCW 29A.08.840 and 2003 c 111 s 256 are each amended to
read as follows:
((All challenges of voter registration under RCW 29A.08.830 made
thirty days or more before a primary or election, general or special,
shall be delivered to the appropriate county auditor who shall notify
the challenged voter, by certified mail, that his or her voter
registration has been challenged.))
(1) If the challenge is not in proper form and the factual basis for
the challenge does not meet the legal grounds for a challenge, the
county auditor may dismiss the challenge and notify the challenger of
the reasons for the dismissal. A challenge is not in proper form if it
is incomplete on its face or does not substantially comply with the
form issued by the secretary of state.
The notification shall be mailed to the address at which the
challenged voter is registered, any address provided by the challenger
under RCW 29A.08.830, and to any other address at which the individual
whose registration is being challenged is alleged to reside or at which
the county auditor would reasonably expect that individual to receive
notice of the challenge of his or her voter registration. Included in
the notification shall be a request that the challenged voter appear at
a hearing to be held within ten days of the mailing of the request, at
the place, day, and hour stated, in order to determine the validity of
his or her registration. The challenger shall be provided with a copy
of this notification and request. If either the challenger or the
challenged voter is unable to appear in person, he or she may file a
reply by means of an affidavit stating under oath the reasons he or she
believes the registration to be invalid or valid.
If both the challenger and the challenged voter file affidavits
instead of appearing in person, an evaluation of the affidavits by the
county auditor constitutes a hearing for the purposes of this section.
The county auditor shall hold a hearing at which time both parties
may present their facts and arguments. After reviewing the facts and
arguments, including any evidence submitted by either side, the county
auditor shall rule as to the validity or invalidity of the challenged
registration. His or her ruling is final subject only to a petition
for judicial review by the superior court under chapter 34.05 RCW. If
either party, or both parties, fail to appear at the meeting or fail to
file an affidavit, the county auditor shall determine the status of the
registration based on his or her evaluation of the available facts.
(2) If the challenge is in proper form and the factual basis meets
the legal grounds for a challenge, the county auditor must notify the
challenged voter and provide a copy of the affidavit. If the challenge
is to the residential address provided by the voter, the challenged
voter must be provided notice of the exceptions allowed in RCW
29A.08.112 and 29A.04.151, and Article VI, section 4 of the state
Constitution. A challenged voter may transfer or reregister until four
days before the election. The county auditor must schedule a hearing
and notify the challenger and the challenged voter of the time and
place for the hearing. If the challenge is filed at least thirty days
before an election at which the challenged voter is eligible to vote,
the county auditor presides over the hearing. If the challenge is
filed within the thirty days before an election at which the challenged
voter is eligible to vote, the county canvassing board presides over
the hearing.
(3) All notice must be by certified mail to the address provided in
the voter registration record, and any other addresses at which the
challenged voter is alleged to reside or the county auditor can
reasonably expect the voter to receive notice. The challenger and
challenged voter may either appear in person or submit testimony by
affidavit.
(4) The challenger has the burden to prove by clear and convincing
evidence that the challenged voter's registration is improper. The
challenged voter must be provided a reasonable opportunity to respond.
If the challenge is to the residential address provided by the voter,
the challenged voter may prove that he or she meets one of the
exceptions allowed in RCW 29A.08.112 or 29A.04.151, or Article VI,
section 4 of the state Constitution. If either the challenger or
challenged voter fails to appear at the hearing, the challenge must be
resolved based on the available facts.
(5) If the challenger fails to prove by clear and convincing
evidence that the registration is improper, the challenge must be
dismissed and the pending challenged ballot must be accepted as valid.
Challenged ballots must be resolved before certification of the
election. The decision of the county auditor or canvassing board is
final subject only to judicial review by the superior court under
chapter 34.05 RCW.
Sec. 5 RCW 29A.08.850 and 2003 c 111 s 257 are each amended to
read as follows:
The secretary of state ((as chief elections officer shall cause
appropriate forms to be designed to carry out the provisions of RCW
29A.08.830 and 29A.08.840. The county auditors and registration
assistants shall have such forms available. Further, a reasonable
supply of such forms shall be at each polling place on the day of a
primary or election, general or special)) must provide forms for voter
registration challenges, and the county auditor must make such forms
available.
Sec. 6 RCW 29A.40.140 and 2003 c 111 s 1014 are each amended to
read as follows:
The qualifications of any absentee voter may be challenged ((at the
time)) before the ((signature on the return envelope is verified and
the ballot is processed by the canvassing board)) voted ballot is
received. The board has the authority to determine the legality of any
absentee ballot challenged under this section. Challenged ballots must
be handled in accordance with chapter 29A.08 RCW.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 7 RCW 29A.08.830 (Affidavit -- Administration,
notice of challenge) and 2003 c 111 s 255 are each repealed.