Read first time 01/25/2005.   Referred to Committee on State Government Operations & Accountability.

     AN ACT Relating to establishing a pilot project to examine the use of instant runoff voting for nonpartisan offices; amending RCW 29A.52.220, 29A.60.160, and 29A.60.190; adding a new chapter to Title 29A RCW; creating new sections; and providing expiration dates.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1   FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. (1) The legislature finds that it is in the public interest to examine the use of a voting system that requires all victorious candidates to be elected with a majority vote rather than a plurality of effective votes, and that allows voters to designate secondary and other preferences for potential tabulation if their first choice candidate does not receive a majority of the votes cast. The legislature recognizes that the system known as instant runoff voting achieves these purposes.
     (2) The legislature wishes to examine whether voter interest and participation in elections will increase when instant runoff voting, a voting method that promotes additional voter choices and a more meaningful recognition of all voter selections, is used to elect nonpartisan candidates. The legislature declares that it is in the interest of participatory democracy for voters to be given the opportunity to vote for their first choice candidate while still making effective secondary choices among the remaining candidates.
     (3) The legislature therefore intends to authorize a limited pilot project to study the effects of using instant runoff voting as a local option for nonpartisan offices in any qualifying city.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2   PILOT PROJECT--INSTANT RUNOFF VOTING. The legislature intends to establish an instant runoff voting pilot project to be completed by willing state and local election administrators in full partnership and cooperation.
     If the county auditor of a county containing any city that has demonstrated support for instant runoff voting, as provided by subsection (1)(c) of this section, provides written notification of pilot project participation to the secretary of state by January 1, 2007, the secretary of state shall conduct a pilot project to examine the use of instant runoff voting as a local option for nonpartisan offices in any qualifying city in that county. Following the timely receipt by the secretary of state of the written notification, the pilot project must begin by August 1, 2008, and conclude no later than July 1, 2013.
     (1) For the purposes of this act, a qualifying city must:
     (a) Be classified as a first class city as defined by chapter 35.22 RCW;
     (b) Have a population greater than one hundred forty thousand and less than two hundred thousand as of the effective date of this act as determined by the office of financial management; and
     (c) Have demonstrated support for instant runoff voting by approving a city charter amendment authorizing the city council to use instant runoff voting for the election of city officers.
     (2)(a) Following the timely receipt by the secretary of state of a notification of participation from a county auditor, and in accordance with the provisions of this section, the secretary of state shall certify at least one city in that county to qualify and participate in the pilot project. Only a qualifying city or cities certified for participation by the secretary of state may participate in the pilot project.
     (b) The county auditor of a county containing a qualifying and certified city who has submitted a timely notification of participation shall participate in the pilot project.
     (3) Elections conducted under the instant runoff voting method for the pilot project must comply with this chapter and may be held only on the dates specified by RCW 29A.04.330(1).
     (4) For the purpose of implementing this chapter, the secretary of state shall develop and adopt:
     (a) Rules governing the conduct of instant runoff voting elections; and
     (b) A pilot project timeline. The secretary of state may consult with appropriate local officials to develop this timeline. The timeline is subject to review and modification by the secretary of state, as necessary.
     (5) All election equipment and related processes shall be certified by the secretary of state before an election may be conducted under the instant runoff voting method.
     (6) The secretary of state shall submit a report of findings to the appropriate committees of the legislature by July 1, 2013, that includes, but is not limited to:
     (a) An assessment of all elections conducted using the instant runoff voting method;
     (b) Recommendations for statutory, rule, and local voting procedural modifications that would be required prior to implementing instant runoff voting as a permanent alternative election method for special and general elections;
     (c) An inventory of available election equipment necessary for conducting elections under the instant runoff method, including costs associated with the equipment; and
     (d) Any recommendations from any city legislative body or county auditor participating in this pilot project.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3   DEFINITIONS. The definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
     (1) "Candidates who remain" means all candidates who have not been eliminated at a previous stage.
     (2) "Choice" means an indication on a ballot of a voter's ranking of candidates for any single office according to the voter's preference.
     (3) "Continuing ballot" means a ballot that is not exhausted.
     (4) "Exhausted ballot" means a ballot on which all indicated choices have become votes for the candidates so designated or when the ballot contains only choices for eliminated candidates.
     (5) "Instant runoff voting" means a system of voting in which voters may designate as many as three candidates for the same office in order of preference by indicating a first choice, a second choice, and a third choice.
     (6) "Last place candidate" means a candidate who has received the fewest votes among the candidates who remain at any stage. Two or more candidates simultaneously become last place candidates when their combined votes are equal to or fewer than all votes for the candidate with the third highest vote total.
     (7) "Next choice" means the highest ranked choice for a remaining candidate that has not become a vote at a previous stage.
     (8) "Remaining candidate" means a candidate who has not been eliminated.
     (9) "Stage" or "stage in the counting" means a step in the counting process during which votes for all remaining candidates are tabulated for the purpose of determining whether a candidate has achieved a majority of the votes cast for a particular office, and, absent a majority, which candidate or candidates must be eliminated.
     (10) "Vote" means a ballot choice that is counted toward election of a candidate. Except as provided by sections 5 and 6 of this act, all first choices are votes. Lower ranked choices are potential votes that may, in accordance with the requirements of this chapter, be credited to and become votes for a candidate.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4   INSTANT RUNOFF VOTING--APPLICABLE PROVISIONS. To the extent they are not inconsistent with this chapter, the laws governing elections apply to the pilot project on instant runoff voting authorized by this chapter. The authority of a city meeting the criteria of sections 2 and 7 of this act to participate in an election conducted under the instant runoff voting method expires on July 1, 2013.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 5   TABULATION OF BALLOTS--COUNTING STAGES. The following provisions, subject to the conditions of section 6 of this act, govern how votes for candidates for each office shall be tabulated under the instant runoff voting method:
     (1) All first choice votes cast for the office shall be tabulated in the first counting stage. If, following this first counting stage, a candidate receives a majority of the votes cast for the office, that candidate is deemed elected to the office and counting ends;
     (2) If no candidate receives a majority of the votes cast for the office during the first counting stage, the second counting stage begins by eliminating the last place candidate for that office. On ballots that indicate a first choice preference for the eliminated candidate, the second choice preferences are counted as votes for the candidates so designated. If, following this second counting stage, a candidate receives a majority of the votes cast for the office, that candidate is deemed elected to the office and counting ends;
     (3) If, following the second counting stage, no candidate receives a majority of the votes cast for the office, the third counting stage begins by eliminating the last place candidate for that office. On ballots that indicate a first choice preference for the eliminated candidate, the next choice preferences are counted as votes for the candidates so designated. If, following this third counting stage, a candidate receives a majority of votes cast for the office, that candidate is deemed elected to the office and counting ends;
     (4) If, following the third counting stage, no candidate receives a majority of the votes cast for the office, the counting process provided by subsection (3) of this section continues in succession until either a candidate receives a majority of the votes cast for the office or all but one candidate has been eliminated. In accordance with the provisions of this subsection, a candidate who receives either a majority of the votes cast for the office or who is the sole remaining candidate shall be deemed elected to the office; and
     (5) If at any stage in the counting process there are two or more last place candidates for the office, these candidates must be eliminated simultaneously. On ballots that indicate a first choice preference for the eliminated candidates, the next choice preferences shall be counted as votes for the candidates so designated.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6   VOTING CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS. (1)(a) Once a ballot is exhausted, it is disregarded and not subject to additional tabulation procedures.
     (b) A ballot assigning the same ranking to more than one candidate for an office is exhausted when the duplicate ranking is reached. No vote may be recorded for any candidates designated with the same ranking on the same ballot.
     (2) The county auditor may not count more than three choices for any one office from a ballot.
     (3) If the total number of votes for all write-in candidates in each race during any counting stage is fewer than the last place candidate among the candidates appearing on the ballot, all write-in candidates must be eliminated for that counting stage and subsequent counting stages.
     (4) If, following the conclusion of the counting stages, the tabulated ballots do not contain a sufficient number of effective second and lower choices for a candidate to receive a majority of the votes cast for any office, the candidate who either has the highest number of votes credited to him or her for that office, or who is the sole remaining candidate shall be deemed elected to the office.
     (5) No votes may be counted for a candidate who has been eliminated.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 7   LOCAL OPTION AUTHORIZED. (1) In accordance with the provisions of section 2 of this act, the legislative body of a qualifying city may, for a specific election or elections, adopt instant runoff voting as the method for electing candidates for all nonpartisan city offices.
     (2)(a) After adoption of instant runoff voting by the legislative body of a qualifying city for a specific election or elections as provided for by subsection (1) of this section, the city shall, before conducting an election using the instant runoff voting method, notify the county auditor and the secretary of state of its intent to hold such an election.
     (b) If the county auditor notifies the city that existing election equipment of the county is insufficient for conducting an election under the instant runoff voting method, the city and the auditor shall negotiate an agreement for the purchase of any new equipment specifically required for this election method. Nothing in this subsection precludes the auditor from canvassing the returns of an instant runoff voting election by hand.
     (3) The date of any election conducted under the instant runoff voting method must be consistent with the timeline required by section 2 of this act.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 8   BALLOT SPECIFICATIONS AND DIRECTIONS TO VOTERS. Ballots for elections conducted under the instant runoff voting method should be clear and easily understood. Sample ballots illustrating voting procedures must be posted in or near voting booths and included within instruction packets for absentee ballots. Directions provided to voters must conform substantially to the following specifications:

     "You may choose a maximum of three candidates for each office in order of preference. Indicate your first choice designation by marking the number "1" beside a candidate's name (or by marking in the column labeled "First Choice"). Indicate your second choice designation by marking the number "2" beside a candidate's name (or by marking in the column labeled "Second Choice"). Indicate your third choice designation by marking the number "3" beside a candidate's name (or by marking in the column labeled "Third Choice"). You are not required to choose more than one candidate for each office. Designating two or more candidates in order of preference will not affect your first choice designation. Do not mark the same designation number beside more than one candidate or put more than one mark in each column for the office on which you are voting. Do not skip designation numbers."

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 9   CHANGES IN VOTING DEVICES AND COUNTING METHODS. Participating state and local election officials may provide for voting directions and the design, processing, and tabulation of instant runoff voting ballots used in the pilot project authorized by section 2 of this act. State and local actions must be consistent with the provisions of this chapter.
     Election officials should provide voters with a ballot that has a distinctive design, format, or layout for offices to which instant runoff voting applies. Ballot sections for contests that have fewer than three candidates for the same office, however, may differ from ballot sections for which the instant runoff voting method applies.

Sec. 10   RCW 29A.52.220 and 2003 c 111 s 1306 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) No primary may be held for any single position in any city, town, district, or district court, as required by RCW 29A.52.210, if, after the last day allowed for candidates to withdraw, there are no more than two candidates filed for the position. The county auditor shall, as soon as possible, notify all the candidates so affected that the office for which they filed will not appear on the primary ballot.
     (2) No primary may be held for nonpartisan offices in any first class city if the city:
     (a) Is a qualifying city that has been certified to participate in the pilot project authorized by section 2 of this act; and
     (b) Is conducting an election using the instant runoff voting method for the pilot project authorized by section 2 of this act.
     (c) This subsection (2) expires July 1, 2013.
     (3) No primary may be held for the office of commissioner of a park and recreation district or for the office of cemetery district commissioner.
     (((3))) (4) Names of candidates for offices that do not appear on the primary ballot shall be printed upon the general election ballot in the manner specified by RCW ((29A.36.130)) 29A.36.131.

Sec. 11   RCW 29A.60.160 and 2003 c 111 s 1516 are each amended to read as follows:
     Except for an election conducted under the instant runoff voting method for the pilot project authorized by section 2 of this act, at least every third day after a primary or election and before certification of the election results, except Sundays and legal holidays, the county auditor, as delegated by the county canvassing board, shall process absentee ballots and canvass the votes cast at that primary or election, if the county auditor is in possession of more than twenty-five ballots that have yet to be canvassed. The county auditor, as delegated by the county canvassing board, may use his or her discretion in determining when to process the remaining absentee ballots and canvass the votes during the final four days before the certification of election results in order to protect the secrecy of any ballot. In counties where this process has not been delegated to the county auditor, the county auditor shall convene the county canvassing board to process absentee ballots and canvass the votes cast at the primary or election as set forth in this section.
     Except for an election conducted under the instant runoff voting method for the pilot project authorized by section 2 of this act, each absentee ballot previously not canvassed that was received by the county auditor two days or more before processing absentee ballots and canvassing the votes as delegated by or processed by the county canvassing board, that either was received by the county auditor before the closing of the polls on the day of the primary or election for which it was issued, or that bears a postmark on or before the primary or election for which it was issued, must be processed at that time. The tabulation of votes that results from that day's canvass must be made available to the general public immediately upon completion of the canvass.

Sec. 12   RCW 29A.60.190 and 2004 c 266 s 18 are each amended to read as follows:
     (1) Except as provided by subsection (3) of this section, on the tenth day after a special election or primary and on the fifteenth day after a general election, the county canvassing board shall complete the canvass and certify the results. Each absentee ballot that was returned before the closing of the polls on the date of the primary or election for which it was issued, and each absentee ballot with a postmark on or before the date of the primary or election for which it was issued and received on or before the date on which the primary or election is certified, must be included in the canvass report.
     (2) At the request of a caucus of the state legislature, the county auditor shall transmit copies of all unofficial returns of state and legislative primaries or elections prepared by or for the county canvassing board to either the secretary of the senate or the chief clerk of the house of representatives.
     (3) On or before the thirtieth day after an election conducted under the instant runoff voting method for the pilot project authorized by section 2 of this act, the canvassing board shall complete the canvass and certify the results.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 13   This chapter expires July 1, 2013.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 14   Sections 11 and 12 of this act expire July 1, 2013.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 15   Sections 1 through 9 and 13 of this act constitute a new chapter in Title 29A RCW.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 16   Captions used in this act are not part of the law.

NEW SECTION.  Sec. 17   If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.