Passed by the House April 18, 2005 Yeas 92   ________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives Passed by the Senate April 7, 2005 Yeas 46   ________________________________________ President of the Senate | I, Richard Nafziger, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1631 as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on the dates hereon set forth. ________________________________________ Chief Clerk | |
Approved ________________________________________ Governor of the State of Washington | Secretary of State State of Washington |
State of Washington | 59th Legislature | 2005 Regular Session |
READ FIRST TIME 02/23/05.
AN ACT Relating to using revenues under the county conservation futures levy; and amending RCW 84.34.230 and 84.34.240.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1 RCW 84.34.230 and 1995 c 318 s 8 are each amended to read
as follows:
Conservation futures are a useful tool for counties to preserve
lands of public interest for future generations. Counties are
encouraged to use some conservation futures as one tool for salmon
preservation purposes.
For the purpose of acquiring conservation futures ((as well as))
and other rights and interests in real property pursuant to RCW
84.34.210 and 84.34.220, and for maintaining and operating any property
acquired with these funds, a county may levy an amount not to exceed
six and one-quarter cents per thousand dollars of assessed valuation
against the assessed valuation of all taxable property within the
county. The limitations in RCW 84.52.043 shall not apply to the tax
levy authorized in this section. Any rights or interests in real
property acquired under this section after the effective date of this
section must be located within the assessing county. Further, the
county must determine if the rights or interests in real property
acquired with these funds would reduce the capacity of land suitable
for development necessary to accommodate the allocated housing and
employment growth, as adopted in the countywide planning policies.
When actions are taken that reduce capacity to accommodate planned
growth, the jurisdiction shall adopt reasonable measures to increase
the capacity lost by such actions.
Sec. 2 RCW 84.34.240 and 1971 ex.s. c 243 s 5 are each amended to
read as follows:
Conservation futures are a useful tool for counties to preserve
lands of public interest for future generations. Counties are
encouraged to use some conservation futures as one tool for salmon
preservation purposes.
(1) Any board of county commissioners may establish by resolution
a special fund which may be termed a conservation futures fund to which
it may credit all taxes levied pursuant to RCW 84.34.230. Amounts
placed in this fund may be used ((solely)) for the purpose of acquiring
rights and interests in real property pursuant to the terms of RCW
84.34.210 and 84.34.220, and for the maintenance and operation of any
property acquired with these funds. The amount of revenue used for
maintenance and operations of parks and recreational land may not
exceed fifteen percent of the total amount collected from the tax
levied under RCW 84.34.230 in the preceding calendar year. Revenues
from this tax may not be used to supplant existing maintenance and
operation funding. Any rights or interests in real property acquired
under this section must be located within the assessing county.
Further, the county must determine if the rights or interests in real
property acquired with these funds would reduce the capacity of land
suitable for development necessary to accommodate the allocated housing
and employment growth, as adopted in the countywide planning policies.
When actions are taken that reduce capacity to accommodate planned
growth, the jurisdiction shall adopt reasonable measures to increase
the capacity lost by such actions.
(2) In counties greater than one hundred thousand in population,
the board of county commissioners or county legislative authority shall
develop a process to help ensure distribution of the tax levied under
RCW 84.34.230, over time, throughout the county.
(3)(a) Between the effective date of this section and July 1, 2008,
the county legislative authority of a county with a population density
of fewer than four persons per square mile may enact an ordinance
offering a ballot proposal to the people of the county to determine
whether or not the county legislative authority may make a one-time
emergency reallocation of unspent conservation futures funds to pay for
other county government purposes, where such conservation futures funds
were originally levied under RCW 84.34.230 but never spent to acquire
rights and interests in real property.
(b) Upon adoption by the county legislative authority of a ballot
proposal ordinance under (a) of this subsection the county auditor
shall: (i) Confer with the county legislative authority and review any
proposal to the people as to form and style; (ii) give the ballot
proposal a number, which thereafter shall be the identifying number for
the proposal; (iii) transmit a copy of the proposal to the prosecuting
attorney; and (iv) submit the proposal to the people at the next
general or special election that is not less than ninety days after the
adoption of the ordinance by the county legislative authority.
(c) The county prosecuting attorney shall within fifteen working
days of receipt of the proposal compose a concise statement, posed as
a positive question, not to exceed twenty-five words, which shall
express and give a true and impartial statement of the proposal. Such
concise statement shall be the ballot title.
(d) If the measure is affirmed by a majority voting on the issue it
shall become effective ten days after the results of the election are
certified.
(4) Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting in any
manner methods and funds otherwise available to a county for financing
the acquisition of such rights and interests in real property.