BILL REQ. #: S-4304.1
State of Washington | 59th Legislature | 2006 Regular Session |
Read first time 01/19/2006. Referred to Committee on Financial Institutions, Housing & Consumer Protection.
AN ACT Relating to investigating and assessing performance in meeting community credit needs; and amending RCW 30.60.010 and 32.40.010.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
Sec. 1 RCW 30.60.010 and 1994 c 92 s 157 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) In conducting an examination of a bank chartered under Title 30
RCW, the director shall investigate and assess the record of
performance of the bank in meeting the credit needs of the bank's
entire community, including low and moderate-income neighborhoods. The
director ((shall)) may accept, in lieu of an investigation or part of
an investigation required by this section, any report or document that
the bank is required to prepare or file with one or more federal
agencies by the act of Congress entitled the "Community Reinvestment
Act of 1977" and the regulations promulgated in accordance with that
act, to the extent such reports or documents assist the director in
making an assessment based upon the factors outlined in subsection (2)
of this section.
(2) In making an investigation required under subsection (1) of
this section, the director shall consider, independent of any federal
determination, the following factors in assessing the bank's record of
performance:
(a) Activities conducted by the institution to ascertain credit
needs of its community, including the extent of the institution's
efforts to communicate with members of its community regarding the
credit services being provided by the institution;
(b) The extent of the institution's marketing and special credit
related programs to make members of the community aware of the credit
services offered by the institution;
(c) The extent of participation by the institution's board of
directors in formulating the institution's policies and reviewing its
performance with respect to the purposes of the Community Reinvestment
Act of 1977;
(d) Any practices intended to discourage applications for types of
credit set forth in the institution's community reinvestment act
statement(s);
(e) The geographic distribution of the institution's credit
extensions, credit applications, and credit denials, and the geographic
distribution, availability, and use of automatic teller machines,
point-of-sale terminals, personal computer banking, debit cards or
similar electronic facilities or services and any training of customers
thereon at each branch of the banking institution, if the institution
offers such a service to any of its customers;
(f) Evidence of prohibited discriminatory or other illegal credit
practices;
(g) The institution's record of opening and closing offices and
providing services at offices;
(h) The institution's participation, including investments, in
local community and microenterprise development projects;
(i) The institution's origination of residential mortgage loans,
housing rehabilitation loans, home improvement loans, and small
business or small farm loans within its community, or the purchase of
such loans originated in its community;
(j) The institution's participation in governmentally insured,
guaranteed, or subsidized loan programs for housing, small businesses,
or small farms;
(k) The institution's ability to meet various community credit
needs based on its financial condition, size, legal impediments, local
economic condition, and other factors;
(l) The institution's participation in credit counseling services;
and
(m) Other factors that, in the judgment of the director, reasonably
bear upon the extent to which an institution is helping to meet the
credit needs of its entire community.
(3) The director may, in assessing the record of performance,
provide for public hearings. The director shall include as part of the
examination report, a summary of the results of the assessment required
under subsection (1) of this section and shall assign annually to each
bank a numerical community reinvestment rating based on a one through
five scoring system. Such numerical scores shall represent performance
assessments as follows:
(a) Excellent performance: | 1 |
(b) Good performance: | 2 |
(c) Satisfactory performance: | 3 |
(d) Inadequate performance: | 4 |
(e) Poor performance: | 5 |
Sec. 2 RCW 32.40.010 and 1994 c 92 s 410 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) In conducting an examination of a savings bank chartered under
Title 32 RCW, the director shall investigate and assess the record of
performance of the savings bank in meeting the credit needs of the
savings bank's entire community, including low and moderate-income
neighborhoods. The director ((shall)) may accept, in lieu of an
investigation or part of an investigation required by this section, any
report or document that the savings bank is required to prepare or file
with one or more federal agencies by the act of Congress entitled the
"Community Reinvestment Act of 1977" and the regulations promulgated in
accordance with that act, to the extent such reports or documents
assist the director in making an assessment based upon the factors
outlined in subsection (2) of this section.
(2) In making an investigation required under subsection (1) of
this section, the director shall consider, independent of any federal
determination, the following factors in assessing the savings bank's
record of performance:
(a) Activities conducted by the institution to ascertain credit
needs of its community, including the extent of the institution's
efforts to communicate with members of its community regarding the
credit services being provided by the institution;
(b) The extent of the institution's marketing and special credit
related programs to make members of the community aware of the credit
services offered by the institution;
(c) The extent of participation by the institution's board of
directors or board of trustees in formulating the institution's
policies and reviewing its performance with respect to the purposes of
the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977;
(d) Any practices intended to discourage applications for types of
credit set forth in the institution's community reinvestment act
statement(s);
(e) The geographic distribution of the institution's credit
extensions, credit applications, and credit denials, and the geographic
distribution, availability, and use of automatic teller machines,
point-of-sale terminals, personal computer banking, debit cards or
similar electronic facilities or services and any training of customers
thereon at each branch of the banking institution, if the institution
offers such a service to any of its customers;
(f) Evidence of prohibited discriminatory or other illegal credit
practices;
(g) The institution's record of opening and closing offices and
providing services at offices;
(h) The institution's participation, including investments, in
local community and microenterprise development projects;
(i) The institution's origination of residential mortgage loans,
housing rehabilitation loans, home improvement loans and small business
or small farm loans within its community, or the purchase of such loans
originated in its community;
(j) The institution's participation in governmentally insured,
guaranteed, or subsidized loan programs for housing, small businesses,
or small farms;
(k) The institution's ability to meet various community credit
needs based on its financial condition, size, legal impediments, local
economic condition, and other factors;
(l) The institution's participation in credit counseling services;
and
(m) Other factors that, in the judgment of the director, reasonably
bear upon the extent to which an institution is helping to meet the
credit needs of its entire community.
(3) The director may, in assessing the record of performance,
provide for public hearings. The director shall include as part of the
examination report, a summary of the results of the assessment required
under subsection (1) of this section and shall assign annually to each
savings bank a numerical community reinvestment rating based on a one
through five scoring system. Such numerical scores shall represent
performance assessments as follows:
(a) Excellent performance: | 1 |
(b) Good performance: | 2 |
(c) Satisfactory performance: | 3 |
(d) Inadequate performance: | 4 |
(e) Poor performance: | 5 |