HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1024
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Environmental Health, Select
Title: An act relating to phasing out the use of polybrominated diphenyl ethers.
Brief Description: Phasing out the use of polybrominated diphenyl ethers.
Sponsors: Representatives Hunter, Priest, Kessler, B. Sullivan, Dickerson, Jarrett, Hasegawa, Campbell, Rodne, Rolfes, McDermott, McIntire, Chase, Green, Hudgins, Upthegrove, Quall, Conway, Clibborn, Sommers, Morrell, Sells, Kenney, Haigh, Cody, Hunt, Lantz, McCoy, Appleton, Pettigrew, Schual-Berke, Roberts, Fromhold, Takko, Simpson, P. Sullivan, Lovick, Flannigan, Moeller, Miloscia, Williams, Blake, O'Brien, Linville, Wood, Goodman, Seaquist, Springer, Ericks, Kagi, Darneille, Dunshee, Strow, Pedersen, Eickmeyer, McCune and Ormsby; by request of Department of Ecology.
Brief History:
Select Committee on Environmental Health: 1/9/07, 1/11/07 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 6 members: Representatives Campbell, Chair; Hudgins, Vice Chair; Chase, Hunt, Morrell and Wood.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 3 members: Representatives Newhouse, Ranking Minority Member; Sump, Assistant Ranking Minority Member and Hailey.
Staff: Brad Avy (786-7289).
Background:
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) are members of a broader class of brominated
chemicals used as flame retardants. They are often added to products such as computers,
televisions, furniture, and carpet pads to reduce the risk of fire if a product is exposed to heat
or flame. There are three main types of PBDEs used in consumer products; Penta-BDE,
Octa-BDE, and Deca-BDE. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers have been measured in blood,
fat, and breast milk in people around the world.
In general, animal toxicity studies indicate that the PBDEs in Penta-BDE commercial
products are more toxic than PBDEs in Octa- or Deca-BDE. Deca-BDE is the least toxic, but
there is growing concern based on several new studies that indicate Deca-BDE is likely to
degrade into the more toxic PBDEs found in Penta- or Octa-BDE products.
On January 28, 2004, Governor Locke signed Executive Order 04-01 directing state agencies
to take certain actions regarding persistent toxic chemicals. The Department of Ecology
(DOE), in consultation with the Department of Health (DOH), was directed to move forward
immediately in developing a chemical action plan that identifies actions the state may take to
reduce threats posed by PBDEs, and to recommend actions by December 1, 2004.
On December 31, 2004, the DOE and the DOH released the Washington State
Polybrominated Diphenyl Ether (PBDE) Chemical Action Plan: Interim Plan, (Interim Plan).
The Interim Plan recommended:
the DOE and the DOH must develop a proposal for a ban on appropriate products
containing Deca-BDE by December 2005;
In January 2006, the agencies issued a Final PBDE Chemical Action Plan (Chemical Action
Plan) recommending that the Legislature immediately ban Penta-BDE and Octa-BDE. The
U.S. manufacturers of Penta-BDE and Octa-BDE voluntarily ceased producing the chemicals
in December 2004, and production of Penta-BDE and Octa-BDE has ended in most
international markets.
The Chemical Action Plan further recommended that use of a third form of PBDE,
Deca-BDE, be banned, provided that safer, effective alternatives were identified, or upon
finding additional evidence of harm caused by Deca-BDE.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
After January 1, 2008, no person may manufacture, knowingly sell, or distribute for in-state
use non-edible products containing polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs).
Exceptions to this ban include:
The ban does not restrict the ability of a manufacturer, importer, or distributor from
transporting products containing PBDEs through the state, or storing products for later
distribution outside the state.
The DOE is to assist state agencies to give priority and preference to purchases that do not
contain PBDEs.
An assessment process is established in which the DOE and the DOH review alternatives to
Deca-BDE products with the consultation of a fire safety committee. The Fire Safety
Committee consists of a representative from the DOE as an ex officio nonvoting member that
chairs the committee and five voting members, appointed by the Governor, from each of the
following five firefighting organizations:
No ban on Deca-BDE in televisions, computers, or upholstered furniture may go into effect
until the DOE, the DOH, and the fire safety committee determine that a safer and technically
feasible alternative that meets applicable fire safety standards is available.
The DOE and the DOH are directed to report to the Legislature by December 15, 2008, on
their findings regarding alternatives to the use of commercial Deca-BDE in residential
upholstered furniture, televisions, and computers; and to report on findings of the Fire Safety
Committee. If no alternatives meet applicable fire safety standards, the DOE must grant an
exemption by rule. The report must also include any additional evidence of the potential
harm posed by Deca-BDE.
The DOE and the DOH are also directed to review risk assessments, scientific studies, and
other relevant findings on alternatives to the use of commercial Deca-BDE in products not
directly addressed in the bill. If a safer and technically feasible alternative becomes available,
the DOE must convene the Fire Safety Committee to determine if the alternative meets
applicable fire safety standards. Findings must be reported to the Legislature by December
15 of the year they are made.
The DOE is to assist manufacturers and retailers to achieve compliance. Retailers who
unknowingly sell banned products are not liable under the bill. Manufacturers must notify
sellers about the provisions in the bill no less than 90 days prior to the effective date of the
restrictions. A manufacturer that knowingly produces, sells, or distributes a product
prohibited from manufacture, sale, or distribution must recall the product and reimburse the
retailer or other purchaser for the product and any shipping and handling.
Enforcement of this chapter must rely on notification and information exchange between the
DOE and manufacturers. A warning letter may be issued to a manufacturer that violates
provisions of this bill. If after one year compliance is not achieved, penalties may be
assessed.
Manufacturers in violation of these provisions in the bill are subject to civil penalties of up to
$1,000 for each violation in the case of a first offense. Manufacturers who are repeat
violators are liable for up to $5,000 for each repeat offense. Penalties collected must be
deposited in the State Toxics Control Account.
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The substitute bill specifies that no ban on Deca-BDE in televisions, computers, and
upholstered furniture goes into effect until the DOE, DOH, and a Fire Safety Committee
determine that a safer and technically feasible alternative that meets applicable fire safety
standards is available. The substitute removes the designated individuals that are represented
on the Fire Safety Committee and allows the committee to be appointed by the Governor
from five fire fighting organizations. The substitute applies the recall provisions to
manufacturers only when manufacturers have knowledge of production, sale or distribution
of a product that is prohibited from manufacture, sale, or distribution under the substitute bill.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Requested on January 3, 2007.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) Polybrominated diphenyl ethers levels are increasing in people and the
environment and action is needed now to protect our most vulnerable populations, including
pregnant women and children. Studies on animals show harmful effects of PBDEs, raising
concern over human exposure. Prohibiting products containing PBDEs, as proposed in the
bill, will help protect human health and at the same time meet applicable fire safety
standards.
(In support with amendment) If it also addresses broader PBDE issues associated with
landfill and biosolids management and the affect on marine life.
(Opposed) Deca-BDE is a proven and effective flame retardant that saves lives. Available
research does not support limiting the use of Deca-BDE. Alternatives to Deca-BDE need to
be identified in advance of a preemptive ban. An unintended consequence of this bill may be
that Deca-BDE will become less available without an alternative in place and consequently
compromise fire safety.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Hunter, prime sponsor; Ted Sturdevant,
Department of Ecology; Rob Duff, Department of Health; Anne Criss, Puget Sound Action
Team; Karen Bowman, Washington State Nurses Assocation; Erika Schreder, Toxic Free
Legacy Coalition; Ricky Grady, Washington Physicians of Social Responsible; Steve
Robinson, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission; Naki Stevens, People for Puget Sound;
Cliff Traisman, Washington Conservation Voters and Washington Environmental Council;
Nick Federici, Washington Toxics Coalition; Bill Laborde, WashPirg; and Mike Brown,
Washington Fire Chiefs Association.
(In support with amendment) Randy Ray, Pacific Seafood Processors Association.
(Opposed) Glade Squires, National Fallen Firefighters Foundation; Tom Brace, Former
Director of Washington State Fire Marshalls; Laura Ruiz, American Fire Safety Council;
William Archer; Jorge and Marsela Chavez; Susan Landry, Albemarle Corporation; and Ray
Dawson and Brad Tower, Bromine Science and Environmental Forum.