HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1113
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Insurance, Financial Services & Consumer Protection
Title: An act relating to prohibiting insurers from having a financial interest in automotive repair facilities.
Brief Description: Prohibiting insurers from having a financial interest in automotive repair facilities.
Sponsors: Representatives Kirby, Williams, McDonald, Hasegawa, Ormsby, Morrell, Moeller and Wallace.
Brief History:
Insurance, Financial Services & Consumer Protection: 1/16/07, 1/18/07 [DP].
Brief Summary of Bill |
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON INSURANCE, FINANCIAL SERVICES & CONSUMER PROTECTION
Majority Report: Do pass. Signed by 5 members: Representatives Kirby, Chair; Kelley, Vice Chair; Strow, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Hurst and Santos.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 3 members: Representatives Roach, Ranking Minority Member; Rodne and Simpson.
Staff: Jon Hedegard (786-7127).
Background:
The Office of the Insurance Commissioner (OIC) is responsible for the regulation of property
casualty insurance in the state of Washington. The OIC is authorized to regulate both the
rates and contracts of the companies doing business in this state. The OIC also oversees
claims handling practices.
Under current insurance rules, insurers must provide an insured with estimates for costs of
vehicle repairs and the names of shops that will repair the vehicle for the estimated costs.
The insurer cannot require an insured to travel an unreasonable distance to get an estimate or
to have a vehicle repaired. Insurers are permitted to have contractual provisions that allow
the insurer to have the vehicles repaired at a facility designated by the insurer.
Although various insurance statutes and rules prohibit unfair practices in auto claims
settlements, no statute or rule explicitly prohibits an insurer from owning all or part of an
automotive repair facility.
Summary of Bill:
An insuring entity may not have any ownership interest in an automotive repair facility. An
insuring entity that has an ownership interest in an automotive repair facility must divest
itself of the ownership interest by July 1, 2008.
"Insuring entity" means an insurer, including a fraternal mutual insurer, that is licensed to
write casualty insurance in this state.
"Ownership interest" means the right to control the affairs of a business, or the right to share
in the profits of a business, and includes a loan to the business when the interest on the loan
is based upon the income of the business or the loan carries more than a commercially
reasonable rate of interest.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) Consumers are required to carry auto insurance. As a result, government must
have adequate consumer protections to prevent abuses. In our system, insurers have control
of the premium dollars and the claims payment process. Over time, insurers are getting
closer to controlling how each dollar is spent. Insurance was developed to pool and spread
risk. Today, insurance is no longer about spreading risk and making the consumer whole.
Insurance is about collecting premiums and reducing exposure. It is the job of an insurer to
reduce claims payment. A question we must ask is - is that job being done in an appropriate
manner? If necessary repairs aren't allowed, or substandard labor or parts are used, safety and
quality are compromised. Steering is illegal in Washington. This bill is intended to prevent
the development of a claims practice that could lead to illegal steering. Insurers will say that
insurer-owned shops reduce costs which, in turn, reduces premiums. Insurer-owned shops
will actually allow insurers to subsidize premiums and limit consumer choice. There is a
train wreck waiting to happen. This concept is being used in other states. Washington
should prevent it before it happens here.
Insurers should focus on the job of insuring customers. They should not try to be in the auto
repair business. Insurers have inherent conflicts of interest that can lead to problems. The
relationship can be adversarial because an auto repair shop wants the customer to be happy
and safe; the insurer wants to process a claim as cheaply as possible. This can lead to a shop
fighting the insurer on behalf of the customer. The complaints usually are due to denials of
repairs. An issue that came up in testimony on previous bills on this subject was a suit over a
similar bill. That statute was upheld by a judge.
Independent shops depend on service and customer service to ensure repeat business.
Insurer-owned shops in California have been fined $5 million by the state and forced to
reinspect thousands of cars. In Detroit, insurer-owned shops were forced to close because
consumers refused to use those shops. Across the country, insurer-owned shops have
customer satisfaction levels that are below the national average.
(Opposed) Customer retention is very important. Insurers can offer many different lines of
insurance and many financial products. Often, an auto claim can lead to an adversarial
relation between an insurer and an insured. In turn, the insured may take all of their business
elsewhere. Allstate has a financial relationship with Sterling Autobody Centers. Sterling has
extremely high customer satisfaction ratings. We are raising the bar in customer service.
Other insurers now are trying to compete on customer service.
Sterling is revolutionizing the repair process. It uses new technology and new team-based
approaches to estimate and to repair damage. There is a lifetime guarantee on the parts and
service. There are 60 Sterling locations in 16 states. There are no Sterling locations in
Washington today or any other insurer-owned auto repair shops. Sterling employees have
career options that did not use to be available in the automotive repair world. Employees are
paid good wages and have retirement benefits and health care coverage. We are proud to be
affiliated with Allstate and disclose that on all of our forms. Not all of Sterling's business is
with Allstate; 15 percent of Sterling's business is from other insurers. Sterling's customer
satisfaction rate is very high.
There are no insurer-owned shops today in Washington. The insurance industry opposes this
bill because that option should not be precluded. If circumstances change and that model can
provide more efficient alternative, it should be an available option. Auto repair is an area
that leads to many complaints to the Attorney General; more competition would improve
service.
Progressive does not own shops. Still, Progressive opposes the bill because all options
should remain open. They do operate a concierge service where a customer can bring in a
car, receive a rental car, and Progressive will take the damaged car to a local shop for repair
and return it to the owner. This is a costly service but Progressive customers and the local
shops like it. Our customer service satisfaction levels have risen.
In addition to the concerns previously raised, the bill also raises issues about upstream
ownership. At what point is owning an interest in an insurer and an auto repair shop
allowed?
Persons Testifying: (In support) Representative Kirby, prime sponsor; and James McMahan
and Mike West, Autobody Craftsman Association.
(Opposed) Mel Sorensen, Allstate Insurance, PCI Insurance and American Family Insurance;
Sharon Mazanec, Sterling Autobody Centers; Cliff Webster, Associated Independent
Agencies; Carrie Tellefson, Progressive Insurance; Moceri, Elizabeth, Allstate Insurance; and
Mike Kapphahn, Farmer's Insurance.