HOUSE BILL REPORT
SHB 1264
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House:
February 23, 2007
Title: An act relating to the portability of public retirement benefits.
Brief Description: Addressing the portability of public retirement benefits.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Fromhold, Conway, B. Sullivan, Kenney, Ericks, Haigh, Ormsby, Simpson and Moeller; by request of Select Committee on Pension Policy and LEOFF Plan 2 Retirement Board).
Brief History:
Appropriations: 1/23/07, 1/29/07 [DPS].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 2/23/07, 94-0.
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 33 members: Representatives Sommers, Chair; Dunshee, Vice Chair; Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Bailey, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Haler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Buri, Chandler, Cody, Conway, Darneille, Dunn, Ericks, Fromhold, Grant, Haigh, Hinkle, Hunt, Hunter, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, Kretz, Linville, McDermott, McDonald, McIntire, Morrell, Pettigrew, Priest, Schual-Berke, Seaquist and Walsh.
Staff: David Pringle (786-7310).
Background:
The Washington retirement system includes rules providing "portability" of a member's
benefits between many of the retirement plans, allowing an individual who earns service in
two or more plans or systems, such as the Teachers' Retirement System Plan 3 (TRS 3) or the
Public Employees' Retirement System Plan 2 (PERS 2) to combine the service credit in
various ways for calculating their benefits at retirement. The portability rules are not
provided to members as contractual benefit rights.
The benefits of portability include the ability to restore withdrawn service credit from another
portability covered plan upon reemployment in a covered plan, to combine service credit
earned in all portability covered systems to become eligible for benefits, and to use the
member's highest base salary to calculate the benefits from all the portability plans.
Plans covered by aspects of the portability provisions include PERS, TRS, the School
Employees' Retirement System (SERS), the Law Enforcement Officers' and Fire Fighters'
Retirement System Plan 2 (LEOFF 2), the Washington State Patrol Retirement System
(WSPRS), the Public Safety Employees' Retirement System, and the city retirement systems
for Seattle, Tacoma, and Spokane. State retirement plans excluded from the portability
provisions include the LEOFF 1 and the Judges' and Judicial Retirement Systems.
Base salary under the portability provisions is defined to exclude many items of
compensation that are included within the definition of salary for calculation of benefits in
many portability covered plans. Some of these items of compensation excluded from base
salary are overtime, lump-sum payments for deferred annual or sick leave, severance pay, and
many other lump-sum payments. In general, fewer of the lump-sum payments such as leave
cash-outs at retirement are included in the Plans 2 and 3 of the various retirement systems
than in the Plans 1. A common item of compensation that is included in individual plans, but
excluded by the base salary definition of portability, is overtime.
Benefits calculated using the portability rules are also impacted by a limitation on benefits if
one of the plans that the member has earned service in have a benefit "cap" or limitation on
the total percentage of final earnings that may be used to calculate benefits. For example,
PERS 1 and TRS 1 have a cap of 60 percent, and the WSPRS has a cap of 75 percent. The
total benefits from the combined systems cannot exceed the amount that the member would
have received had the service all been rendered in one of the plans – and in the case that some
of the service is in a capped plan, the cap can limit the portability benefit as well.
The Plans 3 of PERS, TRS, and SERS include a "20-year indexed benefit." This plan feature
permits a member with 20 or more years of service to leave covered employment, not
immediately collect a monthly defined benefit, and have the member's average final
compensation increased by 3 percent per year from the time of separation until the time that
benefits are commenced. Members of each of the Plans 3 may combine service for purposes
of meeting the 20-year requirement of the indexed benefit. Since 1993 LEOFF 2 has also
provided a 3 percent increase for members that similarly leave after 20 years of service – a
provision that predates the Plans 3 by at least five years. However, LEOFF 2 service may not
be combined with Plan 3 service to qualify for the 3 percent indexed benefit.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
If an item of compensation is included in all of a member's retirement plans covered by the
portability rules, then it may be included in the base salary for calculating benefits under the
portability provisions.
Members with fewer than 15 years of service in a plan with a percentage of pay cap that is
covered by the portability provisions is not subject to the maximum benefit cap when
calculating total benefits under the portability rules.
A member may combine service earned in LEOFF 2 with service earned in PERS, TRS, or
SERS Plan 3 to qualify for the 20-year indexed benefit available in each of these four plans.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) The overtime provision of this bill is particularly important, as its exclusion is
hard on hourly employees. The overtime exclusion under current law doesn't really hurt
salaried employees as much if they are dual members. Employers and employees have
already made contributions to the retirement system on the overtime that their employees
have worked, but portability then reduces the benefits that the members can get later by
excluding this portion of their salary in calculating benefits.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: Pat Thompson, Washington State Council of County and City Employees; and Steve Nelson, Law Enforcement Officers' and Fire Fighters' Plan 2 Retirement Board.