HOUSE BILL REPORT
HB 1569
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Reported by House Committee On:
Health Care & Wellness
Title: An act relating to reforming the health care system in Washington state.
Brief Description: Reforming the health care system in Washington state.
Sponsors: Representatives Cody, Campbell, Morrell, Linville, Moeller, Green, Seaquist, Conway, Dickerson, Appleton, McIntire, McCoy, Kagi, Pedersen, Kenney, Lantz, Santos, Wood and Ormsby.
Brief History:
Health Care & Wellness: 1/31/07, 2/8/07 [DPS].
Brief Summary of Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH CARE & WELLNESS
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Cody, Chair; Morrell, Vice Chair; Barlow, Campbell, Green, Moeller, Pedersen, Schual-Berke and Seaquist.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 4 members: Representatives Hinkle, Ranking Minority Member; Alexander, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Condotta and Curtis.
Staff: Dave Knutson (786-7146).
Background:
In 2004, Washington had approximately 600,000 uninsured persons under age 65. For adults
ages 19-64, 13.2 percent were uninsured. For children ages 0-16, 6 percent were uninsured.
Health coverage through an employer in Washington has declined from 71 percent in 1993 to
around 66 percent in 2004. Rising health care costs are a significant barrier to small
employers offering health coverage for their workers. Between 1999 and 2004, the annual
increase in health insurance premiums for small businesses in Washington was substantially
greater than the annual increase in wages or gross business income, some years by a factor of
more than five. It is estimated that poor quality health care costs the typical employer
between $1,900 and $2,250 per covered employee per year. Recent studies have shown that
only a little more than half of adult patients receive recommended care. The level of
performance is similar whether it is for chronic, acute, or preventive care and across all
spectrums of medical care, including screening, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.
Summary of Substitute Bill:
Connector
A Washington State Health Insurance Connector (Connector) is established. It will be
administered by the Health Care Authority Administrator. The Connector will be governed
by a 12-member Board. The Connector will be responsible for developing and approving all
health benefit plans sold by carriers through the Connector for small employer groups and
employees receiving health coverage through association plans. Four or six plans will be
offered, with at least three deductible and point-of-service cost-sharing options. Benefits
plans will include a plan comparable to the Basic Health Plan, and other plans ranging from
catastrophic to comprehensive coverage. All benefit plans offered through the Connector
must include components to improve quality of care and health outcomes. The Connector
will be responsible for establishing eligibility procedures, collection and transmission of all
premium payments and payroll deductions, and all other aspects of operating a health
insurance coverage program. Health benefit plans will be available through the Connector
beginning January 1, 2008. Also on January 1, 2009, the Connector will administer a
premium assistance program for individuals and employees with household incomes at or
below 200 percent of the Federal Poverty Level. The Connector will charge a surcharge on
all health benefit plans offered to pay for administrative and operational expenses.
Insurance Standards
After January 1, 2009 all health coverage through the small group market, including plans
offered through an association or member governed group, will only be available through the
Connector. Health benefit plans offered through the Connector must be certified by the
Insurance Commissioner. Carriers will develop their rates for health benefit plans offered
through the Connector on an adjusted community rate that may be varied for:
(a) geographic area;
(b) family size;
(c) age; and
(d) wellness activities.
Rates for any age group cannot be more than 375 percent of the lowest rate for all age groups.
Adjusted community rates will pool the medical experience of all eligible individuals.
Carriers are authorized to treat people under 30 as a separate experience pool when setting
their rates.
Individual Market and Washington State Health Insurance Pool
After January 1, 2012, Carriers will not issue or renew any individual health benefit plans
except through the Connector.
Employer and Individual Responsibilities
Employers with more than five employees are required to adopt and maintain a cafeteria plan,
and will collect and transmit amounts designated as payroll deductions by employees to the
Connector. After January 1, 2012, individuals over 18 are required to obtain and maintain
creditable health coverage, if it is deemed affordable by the Connector Board (Board).
Substitute Bill Compared to Original Bill:
The insurance markets that are required to be offered through the Connector are limited to
small group and association plans. The Board will establish procedures to include the
individual market, Washington health insurance program, basic health plan, and state and
K-12 employees in the Connector after January 1, 2012. The Board membership is reduced
from 14 to 12, and health carriers are allowed to serve on it. The maximum number of health
benefit plans that may be offered is increased from five to six, and the Board is given greater
flexibility in designed health benefit plans that range from catastrophic to comprehensive
coverage. The Board may offer a limited health care service plan for dental services. The
Board is directed to develop a risk adjustment system. The basic health plan will not
transition into a premium assistance program through the Connector until 2012.
Commissions will be paid to associations as well as brokers when an eligible small group
enrolls in the Connector. The reinsurance program operated by the Office of the Insurance
Commissioner is removed. The use of the standard health questionnaire is required for
individuals applying for nonsubsidized enrollment in the basic health plan.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Not requested.
Effective Date of Substitute Bill: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed, except for sections 304 to 306, relating to small group insurance coverage through the Connector, which takes effect January 1, 2009.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony:
(In support) This Connector will make it easier for the employers and employees to afford
and keep health coverage. The sequencing of the elements of this bill are important to get
right. As the bill is written, most of the high risk will go into the pool first. Other groups
with known risk and lower risk, like state employees or K-12 employees, should go into the
Connector first. This proposal will increase competition and result in lower costs for
consumers. This is a good approach to sharing responsibility for the cost of health coverage
between individuals, employers, and government. The Connector should be required to use a
risk adjustment mechanism.
(Neutral) The model of a Connector aligns incentives in the health care system to get better
results at a better cost. It will provide continuity of coverage for workers who change
employers or might be self insured. It will lead to better continuity of care and better health
outcomes. It will result in the consumer choosing the health plan that best meets their needs
rather than having health plans attempting to choose their customers. If employees and
employers are able to contribute pre-tax dollars when purchasing health coverage through the
Connector the employee can realize a savings in the cost of their health coverage. In moving
to this model a state should start with a population the health carriers know well.
(With concerns) Combining the individual market, the high risk pool and the small group
market will result in higher costs for everyone receiving their health coverage through the
Connector. These reforms will not attract other health carriers into Washington from other
states. Providing a reinsurance program will reduce incentives for health carriers to manage
the care and costs of their enrollees. The Connector could result in an increased average risk
in the risk pool. An up-front risk adjustment is a better alternative than a reinsurance
program. There is no funding source for the premium subsidy or the reinsurance programs
created in the legislation. There must be a broad based consensus about any changes in the
health insurance statutes to ensure any reforms will not be overturned in a few years.
(Opposed) This bill does not address what small business is asking for. Business wants
affordable health coverage through the private market with more options. The mandatory
nature of the Connector is a problem. Association health plans are already providing
affordable health coverage. There might be a narrower application of the Connector concept
that could be tried. We should make improvements to the existing health care coverage
system and not throw out the entire system.
Persons Testifying: (In support) Dr. Sarah Weinberg, Washington Chapter of Health Care
for All; Robby Stern, Washington State Labor Council; Chuck Hawley, Providence Health
and Services; Lonnie Johns-Brown, Washington Chapter of National Organization for
Women and Washington Clinical Society; Bill Daley, Washington Community Action
Network; Len McComb, Washington State Hospital Association; and Mike Kreidler, Office
of the Insurance Commissioner.
(Neutral) Ed Heisselmeier, Heritage Foundation; and Rick Curtis, Institute for Health Policy
Solutions.
(With concerns) Karen Merrikin, Group Health Cooperative; Audry Halvorson, Primera;
Nancy Ellison, Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield; Rebecca Kavoussi, Community Health Plan
of Washington; and Paul Chasco and Tammy Fellin, Association of Washington Cities.
(Opposed) Carolyn Logue, National Federation of Independent Business; Patrick Connor,
Washington Farm Bureau; Mellani McAleenan, Association of Washington Business; Gary
Smith, Independent Business Association; Mel Sorensen, Washington Assocation of Health
Underwriters; David Westberg, Stationary Engineers and American Federation of Labor and
Congress of Industrial Organizations; and Paul Guppy, Washington Policy Center.