HOUSE BILL REPORT
2SHB 1573
This analysis was prepared by non-partisan legislative staff for the use of legislative members in
their deliberations. This analysis is not a part of the legislation nor does it constitute a
statement of legislative intent.
As Passed House:
March 12, 2007
Title: An act relating to dropout prevention, intervention, and retrieval.
Brief Description: Authorizing a statewide program for comprehensive dropout prevention, intervention, and retrieval.
Sponsors: By House Committee on Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Quall, Priest, P. Sullivan, Pettigrew, Kenney, Kagi, Wallace, McCoy, Dickerson, Lovick, Santos, Hunt, Hasegawa, Simpson, Pedersen, Morrell, Conway, Lantz, O'Brien and Ormsby; by request of Superintendent of Public Instruction).
Brief History:
Education: 2/13/07, 2/27/07 [DPS];
Appropriations: 3/9/07, 3/10/07 [DP2S(w/o sub ED)].
Floor Activity:
Passed House: 3/12/07, 84-13.
Brief Summary of Second Substitute Bill |
|
|
|
|
|
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
Majority Report: The substitute bill be substituted therefor and the substitute bill do pass. Signed by 9 members: Representatives Quall, Chair; Barlow, Vice Chair; Priest, Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Haigh, McDermott, Roach, Santos and P. Sullivan.
Staff: Andrew Colvin (786-7304).
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Majority Report: The second substitute bill be substituted therefor and the second substitute bill do pass and do not pass the substitute bill by Committee on Education. Signed by 23 members: Representatives Sommers, Chair; Dunshee, Vice Chair; Haler, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Cody, Conway, Darneille, Ericks, Fromhold, Grant, Haigh, Hunt, Kagi, Kenney, Kessler, McDermott, McDonald, McIntire, Morrell, Pettigrew, Priest, Seaquist, P. Sullivan and Walsh.
Minority Report: Do not pass. Signed by 7 members: Representatives Alexander, Ranking Minority Member; Bailey, Assistant Ranking Minority Member; Anderson, Chandler, Dunn, Hunter and Schual-Berke.
Staff: Ben Rarick (786-7349).
Background:
School districts are required to report to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction
(OSPI) on an annual basis regarding student graduation rates, dropout rates, and related data.
For the 2004-05 school year, just over 5 percent of students enrolled in grades 9-12, or just
under 16,000 students, dropped out of school. Approximately 74 percent of students in
grades 9-12 graduated on time.
In 2006 the Washington Learns committee, chaired by Governor Gregoire, issued final
recommendations. As part of a number of comprehensive strategies, the committee
recommended the establishment of a grant program for school district and community
partnerships to prevent students from dropping out of school.
Summary of Second Substitute Bill:
The Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) is directed to create a program,
known as the "Building Bridges Program," to award grants to local partnerships. These
partnerships will involve schools, families, and communities and will identify students at
risk of dropping out of school, or who have dropped out, and provide those students with
assistance and support to facilitate the continuation of their education.
Every partnership must include at least one school district, and shall be led by one of several
specified entities. In order to be eligible for a grant, applicants must:
From the funds appropriated for the grant program, a grant shall be awarded to a two-year
demonstration project focusing on three distinct communities and populations, two in
western Washington and one in eastern Washington. The grant recipient shall submit a
report to the Legislature by December 1, 2009.
In consultation with the Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board (WTECB),
the OSPI will develop criteria for the grants and evaluate proposals for funding. In addition,
the OSPI will undertake a variety of specified oversight and support functions with respect to
the grant program and grant recipients.
To support the local partnerships, Educational Service Districts (ESDs) and workforce
development councils shall provide them with training and assistance in specified areas, and
be available for additional assistance at the request of a local partnership.
The OSPI will establish a state-level work group comprised of various specified state
agencies that work with at-risk youth or youth who have dropped out of school. The purpose
of the work group will be to make recommendations to the Legislature, develop and track
performance measures for the partnerships around the state, identify research-based and
emerging best practices for prevention, intervention, and retrieval programs, and examine
issues related to the use of basic education dollars to fund contracts with alternative
educational service providers. Beginning December 1, 2007, the work group will report
annually to the Legislature and the Governor with recommendations.
Basic education dollars may be used to fund contracts with alternative educational service
providers that meet certain requirements.
Appropriation: None.
Fiscal Note: Available.
Effective Date: The bill takes effect 90 days after adjournment of session in which bill is passed. However, the bill is null and void unless funded in the budget.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: (Education)
(In support) In Snohomish County the Workforce Development Council has contracted for
programs to assist at-risk youth. One such program is Project STAR (Supporting Teens at
Risk). These programs have been successful, and can be easily transferrable to other school
districts. A concern with this bill is that too much of the funding seems to go to OSPI rather
than directly to the programs. Dropout prevention is critical in our schools. Twenty-five
percent of kids dropping out of school is an epidemic, and saving those we can is worth the
effort. For at-risk youth, the transition to high school is difficult. Dropout prevention
programs focus less on independence and more on bonding, nurturing, and case management,
and these are the services needed to get a student back on track. This bill could change lives;
it's good for the economy; it builds on existing partnerships and it works. Local initiatives
alone are not as effective as a statewide coordinated effort. The ESDs are well positioned to
address dropout issues in a comprehensive way, and there are existing programs that are
successful and replicable. This bill would provide greater opportunity to do that. It is
important, however, to recognize and maintain existing programs that are successful. This
bill was developed with a broad group of stakeholders, and incorporates best practices from
existing programs. It is important that we have a knowledgeable workforce, and for that
reason this bill is a priority for the WTECB. In addition to workforce issues, the impact on
our health care system of students dropping out of school is significant. The Building
Bridges Program will have a large return on the investment we put into it.
(In support with concerns) This bill does not address retrieval of students who have already
dropped out. There are a number of programs, both within community colleges and
community-based programs, that are effective for dropout retrieval. However, funding for
these programs is threatened because of seat-time requirements in the rules, and this should
be fixed. There are some specific issues within the bill that could be improved. For
example, the requirement in Section 3 that calls for allowing flexibility may conflict with
other language in the bill. The SPI should create an advisory committee to assist with the
duties outlined in Section 3.
(Opposed) None.
Staff Summary of Public Testimony: (Appropriations)
(In support) The Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction supports this bill. I
wanted to clarify some of the intent of the funding pieces. There are basically three
components. First, the grant portion which goes out to local communities to identify
resources to leverage to prevent drop-outs, secondly, there is also funding to educational
service districts to provide technical support and training, particularly in data collection and
tracking mechanisms. This support would emphasize the need for good data. The final piece
would be a state level work group that would review programs and identify barriers that may
be regulatory or financial in nature. There are laws or rules that sometimes prevent entities
from working together, and we can work to break those down through the resources provided
under this bill. The provision to direct 50 percent to entities other than school districts would
ensure that grants would not simply support existing programs in school districts but help
establish new programs.
We leverage private funding with the basic education money we receive from school districts.
The programs offered by this bill can mentor and connect with these children. They can call
them and keep track of their progress, it can really make a difference for that child. We can
help them to get GEDs and we can help them get connected with work opportunities even if
they don't get a full diploma.
The Washington Health Foundation supports this bill. We want Washington to be the
healthiest state in the nation. Research shows that the most significant social determinant of
health is education level. It is true on a year-to-year basis, and is a stronger relationship than
either income, or access to healthcare. The Communities in Schools of Washington, which
has a 30 year history of providing services to kids in danger of dropping out of school,
supports this bill.
(Opposed) None.
Persons Testifying: (Education) (In support) Representative Quall, prime sponsor; Sandra
Kelly, North West Prevention Cooperative; Brad Garner, Shohmish County Workforce
Development Council; Terry Munther, Education School District 101; Mick Moore, Puget
Sound Education School District; Martin Mueller, Office of the Superintendent of Public
Instruction; Becky Ballbach, Everett Public Schools; Wes Pruitt, Workforce Training and
Education Coordinating Board; Michael Christianson, Bethel School District; Kathleen Lopp,
Washington Association for Career and Technical Education; Susan Longstreth, Bremerton
School District; and Sandi Swarthout, Washington Health Foundation.
(In support with concerns) Pat Martinez, Learning Center North; and Renee Mona,
Communities in Schools.
Persons Testifying: (Appropriations) Isabel Munoz-Colon, Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction; Sandy Swarthout, Washington Health Foundation; Sharon Case, Communities in Schools of Washington; and Pat Martinez, Learning Center North, King County Work Training Program and Shoreline Community College.